The old "consolation" prize. You lost, but you might have won if things bounced your way.You know I’ve often wondered what’s the point of the two minute report LOL because it doesn’t change the fact the refs made a mistake and that’s all.
https://official.nba.com/nba-last-two-minute-reports-frequently-asked-questions/You know I’ve often wondered what’s the point of the two minute report LOL because it doesn’t change the fact the refs made a mistake and that’s all.
Refs trying to retroactively find a way to cost the Kings last night’s game.
I think they do this because they have a cumulative season total that can get you suspended. I do think that should have been flagrant though. I mean, he literally took 2 hands and shoved that dude right into his own player.
That's an interesting question, skimming through https://official.nba.com/rule-no-12-fouls-and-penalties/#flagrantfouls, I wasn't seeing anything about a fine being levied for a flagrant foul 1 (compared to a technical foul or an ejection)
The technical fouls suspension/fine schedule is published here https://official.nba.com/rule-no-12-fouls-and-penalties/#fines, but there doesn't seem to be a similar published schedule for flagrant fouls.I think they have some sort of "points" system with flagrant fouls, similar to technicals where you can get suspended when you exceed the allotted amount of points.
It always feels kinda crappy (usually a soccer thing) when guys get retroactively punished and then a team that beats you might be disadvantaged against a team you need to lose to maintain your spot in the standings.No reason the NBA can’t go back through the game videos and assess flagrant foul points/totals to individuals who hammer Sabonis on the head. I mean, the refs won’t call fouls to protect him but WTF.
But I was told that we shouldn’t focus on the refereesI'm not going to go to the effort of verifying those numbers, but assuming they are correct...
Net calls in team's favor in final two minutes per close game (by NBA admission):
Lakers: +0.42
Warriors: +0.33
Celtics: -0.05 (approximate, number of close games not listed, calculated for 20 close games, will be ~0 at any rate)
T'Wolves: -0.07
Pelicans: -0.11
Bulls: -0.17
Jazz: -0.24
Kings: -0.45
Now, there's 22 more teams, so we can't say for sure we're getting hosed the worst...but from among the teams listed we're nearly twice as hosed as the next-worst team.
Oh, who would have guessed that SAC and UTA would get the short end of calls?
FYI, Sac is dead last on the list as far as % of missed calls going our way (36.1%).
Early in the season someone did for the Kings at least one, maybe two years back. We were consistently hosed. I think it's clearly unconscious bias at best and a conscious bias at worst. And probably it truly is somewhere in the middle.Need to go back a couple of years to see if there is any consistency. But it is not at all surprising to see both LA teams and GS in the top 3 spots.
Lakers, Clips and Warriors...how predictableNeed to go back a couple of years to see if there is any consistency. But it is not at all surprising to see both LA teams and GS in the top 3 spots.
So we have tangible proof on the last 2 minutes of close games.
Now go back and do the previous 46 minutes.
I truly believe there is justification for legal action against the NBA here when you look at how much money is involved over the short and long term in winning/losing records. Surely there’s some NBA rule against this, but it would be a heckuva PR stink if a team chose to start that conversation…So we have tangible proof on the last 2 minutes of close games.
Now go back and do the previous 46 minutes.