Anybody Interested in Chris Bosh?

Bballkingsrock

All-Star
I was thinking about how Chris might be on the market and how Lebron knows that he could use some replacements for Mike Miller and co. Lebron likes Thornton so maybe a trade proposal of

Marcus Thornton (Lebron getting him open 3s)
John Salmons (Lebron getting him open 3s plus good backup for Wade)
Jimmer ( Lebron getting him Open 3s)

for

Chris Bosh ( Miami gets rid of his contract and Kings get a decent big man to go along Cousins for at least year. Bosh has player options after, we could get rid of him after if he doesnt want to stay and release 20 mill of the books worst case scenario)

Just a thought. :D
 
There's no way Miami goes for that trade lol. The discussion with them starts and ends with Demarcus Cousins. We then hang up the phone. We won't trade our cornerstone player and they won't accept scraps for Chris Bosh.
 
There's no way Miami goes for that trade lol. The discussion with them starts and ends with Demarcus Cousins. We then hang up the phone. We won't trade our cornerstone player and they won't accept scraps for Chris Bosh.


You might be surprised what Miami might be willing to take for Bosh. The salaries of their big three continue to escalate to a point where it might make sense to let one go, or, better yet, break a contract up into 2 or 3 role players. Unless they deem Dwyane Wade's health a big issue, Bosh would be the guy to which they'd look to do that. Perhaps they'd consider a package of Salmons, Thornton and Pat Patterson. Salmons contract can be terminated by the team after next season thus freeing up 7M of what would have still been on Bosh's yearly contract, Thornton would provide a capable shooter/scorer off the bench and Patterson would replace Bosh's abilities as a stretch big and is actually a better 3pt shooter.

I'm actually not much of a fan of Bosh, but he would provide a solid offensive option and rebounder next to Cuz. But is he worth 20M per year? Uh, no way. Not only that, his typical performances in big playoff games - see Game 7 the other night - wouldn't inspire me to want to take on that contract (I seriously doubt he opts out of the final 2 years At 20.5 and 22M respectively).
 
You might be surprised what Miami might be willing to take for Bosh. The salaries of their big three continue to escalate to a point where it might make sense to let one go, or, better yet, break a contract up into 2 or 3 role players. Unless they deem Dwyane Wade's health a big issue, Bosh would be the guy to which they'd look to do that. Perhaps they'd consider a package of Salmons, Thornton and Pat Patterson. Salmons contract can be terminated by the team after next season thus freeing up 7M of what would have still been on Bosh's yearly contract, Thornton would provide a capable shooter/scorer off the bench and Patterson would replace Bosh's abilities as a stretch big and is actually a better 3pt shooter.

I'm actually not much of a fan of Bosh, but he would provide a solid offensive option and rebounder next to Cuz. But is he worth 20M per year? Uh, no way. Not only that, his typical performances in big playoff games - see Game 7 the other night - wouldn't inspire me to want to take on that contract (I seriously doubt he opts out of the final 2 years At 20.5 and 22M respectively).

Like I said, IMO, they won't take scraps for Bosh. There's a reason why Miami has been to the Finals 3 years in a row (of course they have Lebron). It's because they are not idiots over there. Just because Bosh has been ridiculed as of late doesn't mean he's a scrub. He's a 5 time NBA All star and a 2 time NBA Champion who's only 29 years old. He has had to take a backseat to Lebron and Wade so his offensive touches are limited but he was a 20 10 player for Toronto while leading them to the playoffs multiple times as THE focal point of that team.
 
On another far-fetched note, anyone see the report from Sulia that one NBA source hears Deng, Aldridge, and Granger may be available? Now, it appears CLE is making a push for Deng, but how much could it possibly cost to land Aldridge, and would any price not include DMC or Tyreke? I can't see it, but that sort of pick intrigues me. POR is exploring a deal of their #10 for Gortat, potentially, and could also have their eye on Pekovic. With that, reading between the lines could indicate they are looking to find some value for LaMarcus.

I do like Granger, and also think someone like Randolph would be an interesting piece with DMC as well.

As to Bosh, there were times during the playoffs it almost seemed like he was frozen. He appears to have lost much of the edge on his jumper and almost all of that explosiveness he had during his days in TOR when he was really a dangerous and unpredictable presence in the post. Without a shot and mobility, and lacking any semblance of consistent defense or rebounding, I think we can do better than take on a guy that makes over $19M next year and over 20M (in player options, no less) the two years that follow that. Ick.
 
I like Bosh on the offensive end... His deep range would give Cousins a decent amounts of 1 on 1 rebound opportunities, especially if Cousins were moved to PF.

Only problem is, he wouldn't add anything special defensively. Not more than what Thompson offers, anyway.

But Bosh is a superstar, and the second most important player on that team, maybe THE most important. We don't have the assets to get him.
 
I like Bosh on the offensive end... His deep range would give Cousins a decent amounts of 1 on 1 rebound opportunities, especially if Cousins were moved to PF.

Only problem is, he wouldn't add anything special defensively. Not more than what Thompson offers, anyway.

But Bosh is a superstar, and the second most important player on that team, maybe THE most important. We don't have the assets to get him.

You haven't watched the playoffs...
 
On another far-fetched note, anyone see the report from Sulia that one NBA source hears Deng, Aldridge, and Granger may be available? Now, it appears CLE is making a push for Deng, but how much could it possibly cost to land Aldridge, and would any price not include DMC or Tyreke? I can't see it, but that sort of pick intrigues me. POR is exploring a deal of their #10 for Gortat, potentially, and could also have their eye on Pekovic. With that, reading between the lines could indicate they are looking to find some value for LaMarcus.

I do like Granger, and also think someone like Randolph would be an interesting piece with DMC as well.

Did not see that report, but saw the Deng for #3 rumors. Needless to say a lot of interesting names there if that's true, and if we ended up burning this pick to get a major vet, would nto bother me at all, if it were the right guy. Can't imagine any package acceptable to Portland for Aldridge without Cousins or Reke in it, but I would surely throw anything else out there they wanted to try. Granger is of interest and I've mentioned I can see us having some backcourt pieces of interest to Indiana. Deng scares me with the length of his contract and my expectation he is wearing out, but if the #3 deal falls through and they were up for #7 and some of our bad contracts (Hayes, Salmons, Outlaw etc.), well... And that's before we get to the idea of using our #7 to get Gortat, if he's out there for the #10. Or...
 
Did not see that report, but saw the Deng for #3 rumors. Needless to say a lot of interesting names there if that's true, and if we ended up burning this pick to get a major vet, would nto bother me at all, if it were the right guy. Can't imagine any package acceptable to Portland for Aldridge without Cousins or Reke in it, but I would surely throw anything else out there they wanted to try. Granger is of interest and I've mentioned I can see us having some backcourt pieces of interest to Indiana. Deng scares me with the length of his contract and my expectation he is wearing out, but if the #3 deal falls through and they were up for #7 and some of our bad contracts (Hayes, Salmons, Outlaw etc.), well... And that's before we get to the idea of using our #7 to get Gortat, if he's out there for the #10. Or...

Dude, I'd package Evans for Aldridge. That's a no brainer. Evans doesn't have a position he excells in. I'd rather let some other team figure out his identity and improve his decision making. I'll let the Blazer fans watch him dribble into the paint against 3 opponents or throw up one of those slight fade away jumpers next year. Cousins and Aldridge would be sweet.
 
Dude, I'd package Evans for Aldridge. That's a no brainer. Evans doesn't have a position he excells in. I'd rather let some other team figure out his identity and improve his decision making. I'll let the Blazer fans watch him dribble into the paint against 3 opponents or throw up one of those slight fade away jumpers next year. Cousins and Aldridge would be sweet.

Cousins and Aldridge would lead to an assault.
 
Dude, I'd package Evans for Aldridge. That's a no brainer. Evans doesn't have a position he excells in. I'd rather let some other team figure out his identity and improve his decision making. I'll let the Blazer fans watch him dribble into the paint against 3 opponents or throw up one of those slight fade away jumpers next year. Cousins and Aldridge would be sweet.

I would love to be amused about the confusion about Reke, but I shouldn't have to be pointing out to Sacramento Kings fans that Tyreke had the 2nd highest FG% of any SG in the entire league last year (.478), and an assist/TO ratio (1.79/1) nearly identical to DWade (1.81) and better than Kobe (1.63) or Harden (1.54), all confused puppies needing to figure things out obviously.
 
I would love to be amused about the confusion about Reke, but I shouldn't have to be pointing out to Sacramento Kings fans that Tyreke had the 2nd highest FG% of any SG in the entire league last year (.478), and an assist/TO ratio (1.79/1) nearly identical to DWade (1.81) and better than Kobe (1.63) or Harden (1.54), all confused puppies needing to figure things out obviously.

Nice stats. I still don't like the way he plays. Poor decisions, his jump shot is ... well .... let's just say I do a lot of 'no, no, no ... yes' when it goes in, he is hurt a lot, and the team hasn't improved with him as their top player. Also, from what I heard and read, he doesn't like playing with Cousins. I'd rather have Alderidge. Tyreke does make cool lay-ups and half court shots.

I don't want to just give Tyreke away, but would trade him for an all star and better player. You wouldn't say that Tyreke is better than Kobe, Wade, or Harden would you, puppy, even though his turnover rate is better?
 

This-is-gonna-be-good.gif


FYI, Evans was only the Kings' best player for one year. And, in that year, they went from a 17-win team to a 25-win team. Then, they drafted Cousins, and he became their second-best player.
 
This-is-gonna-be-good.gif


FYI, Evans was only the Kings' best player for one year. And, in that year, they went from a 17-win team to a 25-win team. Then, they drafted Cousins, and he became their second-best player.

He called me a confused puppy because I didn't know that Evans had a better turnover rate that Kobe last year and that he should be in the same sentence as Kobe, D-Wade, and Harden. Makes sense since they all handle the ball and Kings don't want the ball in Tyreke's hands. Ha!

Let me rephrase ... the Kings haven't gotten better with Evans as one of their top players and I would like it if they traded him for an all star player. That was supposed to be my point.
 
Nice stats. I still don't like the way he plays. Poor decisions, his jump shot is ... well .... let's just say I do a lot of 'no, no, no ... yes' when it goes in, he is hurt a lot, and the team hasn't improved with him as their top player. Also, from what I heard and read, he doesn't like playing with Cousins. I'd rather have Alderidge. Tyreke does make cool lay-ups and half court shots.

I don't want to just give Tyreke away, but would trade him for an all star and better player. You wouldn't say that Tyreke is better than Kobe, Wade, or Harden would you, puppy, even though his turnover rate is better?

Puppy? You're new around here obviously. And BTW I referred to Wade, Harden and Kobe as confused puppies, not you. As obviously Tyreke's game is a mess and yet he shoots it more efficiently and turns it over less than the best in the league.

And I would say this: if I told you these 4 guys were all available as free agents, you would take a look at them and go hmm, all kind of the same class of player:
Player1: .463FG% .324Tpt% .839FT% 5.2reb 5.6ast 1.3stl 0.3blk 3.4TO
Player2: .478FG% .338Tpt% .775FT% 5.1reb 4.1ast 1.6stl 0.5blk 2.3TO
Player3: .438FG% .368Tpt% .851FT% 4.6reb 5.5ast 1.7stl 0.5blk 3.6TO
Player4: .521FG% .258Tpt% .725FT% 5.2reb 5.3ast 1.9stl 0.8blk 2.9TO

If I then explained to you that their usage percentages were:
Player1: 31.9
Player2: 22.3
Player3: 29.0
Player4: 29.5

you might appropriately wonder what the hell the coach of Player2 was thinking, and just what his numbers would look like if he was actually featured like the other guys.

Those are the per 36 numbers of Kobe, Tyreke, Harden and Wade BTW. Many Kings fans got off to a bad start with Reke's game and never recovered or even cared to bother trying to see through the Keith Smart haze. I can't see through it clearly either, but I can damn well tell SOMETHING is going on, and that it would be a great way to look foolish if you did not make sure of what you were seeing. He doesn't have to be any of those guys to be a helluva player. Even if he were 20-5-5 and nothing more he could easily be the #2 SG in the league in a couple of years with Wade and Kobe departing stage left.
 
Last edited:

When the Heat win, Bosh plays well. He plays poorly, they lose. Lebron as well. They're the two most important parts.

Wade, not so much. He can play well and the Heat still lose, or play poorly and win. He's a great player, but Bosh is the lone hand in the frontcourt.
 
Puppy? You're new around here obviously.

And I would say this: if I told you these 4 guys were all available as free agents, you would take a look at them and go hmm, all kind of the same class of player:
Player1: .463FG% .324Tpt% .839FT% 5.2reb 5.6ast 1.3stl 0.3blk 3.4TO
Player2: .478FG% .338Tpt% .775FT% 5.1reb 4.1ast 1.6stl 0.5blk 2.3TO
Player3: .438FG% .368Tpt% .851FT% 4.6reb 5.5ast 1.7stl 0.5blk 3.6TO
Player4: .521FG% .258Tpt% .725FT% 5.2reb 5.3ast 1.9stl 0.8blk 2.9TO

If I then explained to you that their usage percentages were:
Player1: 31.9
Player2: 22.3
Player3: 29.0
Player4: 29.5

you might appropriately wonder what the hell the coach of Player2 was thinking, and just what his numbers would look like if he was actually featured like the other guys.

Those are the per 36 numbers of Kobe, Tyreke, Harden and Wade BTW. Many Kings fans got off to a bad start with Reke's game and never recovered or even cared to bother trying to see through the Keith Smart haze. I can't see through it clearly either, but I can damn well tell SOMETHING is going on, and that it would be a great way to look foolish if you did not make sure of what you were seeing. He doesn't have to be any of those guys to be a helluva player. Even if he were 20-5-5 and nothing more he could easily be the #2 SG in the league in a couple of years with Wade and Kobe departing stage left.

Eh... I tought you were calling me a confused puppy earlier. Anyways, I hope he does become that type of player and that he and Cousins can coexist. I'd still trade him for LeMarcus.
 
He called me a confused puppy because I didn't know that Evans had a better turnover rate that Kobe last year and that he should be in the same sentence as Kobe, D-Wade, and Harden...
If you want to get technical about it, he made a general, "If the shoe fits" comment, that you took offense to (I guess the shoe fit, after all), and you responded with a personal comment.

And, FWIW, your "all-star" doesn't improve his team as much as you'd like to believe. Check his career record without Roy some time.
 
Last edited:
If you want to get technical about it, he made a general, "If the shoe fits" comment, that you took offense to (I guess the shoe fit, after all), and you responded with a personal comment.

And, FWIW, your "all-star" doesn't improve his team as much as you'd like to believe. Check his career record without Roy some time.

I didn't take offense to it. I was joking around. I would hope that the word puppy wouldn't hurt anyones feelings, right? You seem upset, though. Sorry buddy.

Well, I guess it would be a trade with two players who don't win. O-well. So you wouldn't trade Tyreke for LeMarcus?
 
I didn't take offense to it. I was joking around. I would hope that the word puppy wouldn't hurt anyones feelings, right? You seem upset, though. Sorry buddy.

Well, I guess it would be a trade with two players who don't win. O-well. So you wouldn't trade Tyreke for LeMarcus?
WHO ARE YOU CALLING UPSET? I'LL FIGHT YOU RIGHT NOW!!!

[/sarcasm]

I mean, seriously, there's not a word in my post that indicates being upset at anything. I don't even recall offering a personal opinion. I'm not sure what you're actually talking about?
 
I like Bosh on the offensive end... His deep range would give Cousins a decent amounts of 1 on 1 rebound opportunities, especially if Cousins were moved to PF.

Only problem is, he wouldn't add anything special defensively. Not more than what Thompson offers, anyway.

But Bosh is a superstar, and the second most important player on that team, maybe THE most important. We don't have the assets to get him.

I'm sorry, but Bosh has never been or ever will be a superstar. He was a star player in Toronto, but has turned into an overpaid role player in Miami.
 
Nice stats. I still don't like the way he plays. Poor decisions, his jump shot is ... well .... let's just say I do a lot of 'no, no, no ... yes' when it goes in, he is hurt a lot, and the team hasn't improved with him as their top player. Also, from what I heard and read, he doesn't like playing with Cousins. I'd rather have Alderidge. Tyreke does make cool lay-ups and half court shots.

I don't want to just give Tyreke away, but would trade him for an all star and better player. You wouldn't say that Tyreke is better than Kobe, Wade, or Harden would you, puppy, even though his turnover rate is better?

The only place I have heard this is from Grant Napier (haven't been able to find anything anywhere else to back it up). Considering Grant's attitude toward Cousins this season, I would take most of what he says with a grain of salt. Even when he was calling games he couldn't compliment Cousins play without following it up something negative.
 
The Kings haven't gotten better with any of their players. Trade 'em all. How do you trade a mediocre player for an all star?