Adelman's way might get the Rockets up to speed

Ryan

I like turtles
Adelman's way might get the Rockets up to speed
By Marc Stein
ESPN.com
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/trainingcamp07/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&page=Rockets-071018

It seems rather premature, some three weeks into the preseason, to be talking about any sort of Rick Adelman Effect in Houston.

Or does it?

The Rockets would debate you hard on that one, given their vivid recollections of how last season started. That was when Tracy McGrady made the very early -- and very unsettling -- disclosure that he was thinking about retiring when his current contract expires to try a sport that doesn't tax the body like basketball does. Baseball, namely.

This season?

This was McGrady after just a week of Adelman practices: "Playing this way could put a couple more years on my career."

It doesn't exactly equate to an in-stone commitment from their cornerstone, but it does rank as an undeniable booster shot for the Rockets' battered psyche. When we last saw him, T-Mac was absorbing the blame and shame of Houston's inability to beat Utah at home in Game 7 in the first round of the playoffs, which extended his draining and humbling run as the league's Best Player To Never Win A Playoff Series to a painful 10 seasons.

It has to hearten his Rockets bosses -- who preside over a franchise that also has failed to win a single playoff series in that same decade-long span -- to hear McGrady speak optimistically about the future so soon after such a grave disappointment. Especially since he still has that creaky, cranky back to deal with.

McGrady, though, is otherwise trying to temper the latest outbreak of runaway hype in town after the Rockets followed up the dismissal of coach Jeff Van Gundy by ushering in the Adelman era and making more offseason moves than any other team in the West. Encouraged as he was to see the acquisition of the highly rated Luis Scola and the return of Steve Francis as a bargain-priced role player, T-Mac clearly hasn't forgotten that the Rockets were similarly celebrated for their aggressive moves during the previous two summers, first for signing Stromile Swift in 2005 and then for acquiring Shane Battier and Bonzi Wells in 2006.

Which is why McGrady, more than once since training camp opened, has offered the following disclaimer: "We look great on paper, as they say, but the game is played on the court."

Similar caution comes from Yao Ming, who lets out a hearty laugh whenever someone hits him with the idea that this is the best team he has ever played on.

"We say that every year," Yao says. "Let's just do our job [and] make this the best year we ever had. That's it. I don't want to say anything more."

Yet it does seem safe, even at this juncture, to predict that Space City's team will indeed inch closer to the San Antonio-Dallas stratosphere and make the Texas Triangle as unfriendly as it has ever been. The Rockets also are convinced -- long before we find out whether they can finally do some playoff damage for the first time since the days of Hakeem Olajuwon, Charles Barkley and Clyde Drexler -- that they will quickly hush the skeptics who question Yao's ability to keep up in Adelman's faster-paced offense.

Even McGrady was among those skeptics initially. When asked recently if outsiders were justified in questioning whether Yao has the speed and stamina to play center in a pass-and-move system, McGrady admitted, "I'm the same way."

But now McGrady sees that Adelman doesn't intend to turn Yao into a running center. Adelman simply wants to turn him into a Vlade Divac-like passing center for stretches, hoping the time spent operating out of the high post will (a) capitalize on Yao's underrated dishing and shooting abilities and (b) spare him some wear and tear over the course of a season.
As Adelman happily notes, his Portland teams went to the NBA Finals twice with the plodding Kevin Duckworth at center. So you can understand the coach's confidence in Yao's ability to survive in this system, given that his skills are literally from another world compared to Duckworth's, and with Yao now being tutored daily on the nuances of high-post, face-up play by new Rockets assistant Jack Sikma.

"We're not Phoenix," Adelman says. "We're not going to be that. I think what we try to do is have a flow. It's not about how much they run. It's about getting into a flow.

"[Yao is] going to get there. People would be surprised at how he gets down the court, [but] I don't see it as a problem at all. We're not going to be helter-skelter. What we want to do is get into a flow, get into things without [play] calls, so that we're just reading the defense.

"For [Yao], more than anything, it's the speed of the cuts and the motion [that he has to learn]. That's why Vlade was so good in our offense. But Yao will get there. He just hasn't done it to this point. I've said it before that I think Jeff did a great job with him. He made him into a very good low-post player. Now we just want to let him expand, do other things on the floor. He's just going to get better and better."

Said Wells, who thrived in Adelman's read-and-react scheme for a season in Sacramento: "If you think about Brad Miller in this offense, he was an All-Star. Brad had a triple-double just by us giving him the ball up top and everyone cutting off him. So people are going to be surprised.

"Initially, we're going to try to make cuts off [Yao] and get easy baskets. Yao is going to be that guy looking over everybody and making that key pass. But when you think about the last eight to 10 seconds of the shot clock, we're [still] going to get the ball down low to Yao and go to our strengths."

Of course, even if Yao's stamina proves no obstacle and the adjustment to this new offensive philosophy goes smoothly for him, Houston still is looking at plenty of potential problem areas … No. 1 being the Rockets' home state.

Just locking up a top-four playoff seed, before it even gets to the matter of actually winning a series, requires finishing ahead of San Antonio and Dallas in the regular season. You'll recall that the fifth-best win total in the league last season -- 52-30 in spite of protracted injury absences for McGrady and Yao -- placed Houston only third in the Texas standings.

There are projections on this very Web site that Adelman's Rockets will not have to worry about such seeding pitfalls, projections suggesting that they will be a 60-win team and a championship contender. Yet, that will require Houston to defy history, based on the distinct lack of playoff success on their two stars' résumés and Adelman's own string of postseason failings.

Fact is, Houston is looking at a list of uncertainties that's virtually Yao-sized. So many that McGrady makes a good point when he argues that switching to the new offense is far down the list of challenges.

Do the Rockets have enough proven on-floor leadership?

Can their two best players stay healthy?

How much will they lose defensively without Van Gundy prodding them?

The list of individuals with something to prove is no shorter: Is Wells' return to prominence as simple as reuniting him with Adelman? Even though Scola certainly looks like the sort of skilled and energetic power forward that should flourish alongside Yao, will the Argentinean really have the impact he has had in Europe and with his national team, since he now will be playing against consistently bigger players than he has ever faced? Then there's the big Francis question mark: specifically, whether he has anything left physically.

Bonus question: How is Adelman going to make use of Francis, Mike James, Rafer Alston and rookie Aaron Brooks at lead guard, when he's known for keeping rotations tight?

"I don't necessarily care about all the talent we have," McGrady says. "We have to become a great team. Guys who can score the ball might have to do something else.

"We've got a lot of talent, but who knows? We might have some guys bitching about playing time. We might have some guys bitching about shots. If we can get guys to sacrifice, then maybe we can become a great team."

McGrady has his own maybes to address, too, as he draws closer to the time when he will be forced to make a firm decision about the future.

With just two seasons left on his contract after this one and after making the unexpected admission last November that he might be losing a step, McGrady remains prone to voicing his frustration in response to the physical pounding he takes. But he also is visibly excited by the prospect of what playing off the ball more -- as opposed to having to start and finish so many possessions for Van Gundy -- can do for his longevity.

"We'll have to see," McGrady said. "I'm not ruling anything out.

"At 28, going on my 11th year, my body, man … I don't feel 28 out there playing sometimes. It's the way my body is structured. My back is really ginger. Who knows how it will hold up?

"[But] Rick, his offense fits me more, my style of play, what I do best. Which is getting up and down the court, getting in transition, making plays, freelancing. It's going to be fun."
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how old this is. In any case, this brings up something we all talked about when Yao first came into the league - he would fit perfectly into the old Kings system of the high post and running the offence through the center. Looks like we’re not the only ones.
 
I'm not sure how old this is. In any case, this brings up something we all talked about when Yao first came into the league - he would fit perfectly into the old Kings system of the high post and running the offence through the center. Looks like we’re not the only ones.

Going by the last few #s in your link, it was probably posted Oct 18th.
 
They will be fun to watch and they will win a lot too

It's definitely coming together. Obviously we don't have the same lockdown defense anymore but there is so much depth on this team that I'm not sure what Adelman will do. Plus Yao has looked awesome in the high post. He's as good as anyone at finding cutters and finding slick ways to get the ball to cutters (helps being taller than everyone else) and his jumper has been very reliable.

And man, a few months ago, we were all saying bye bye to Rafer Alston, but that guy not only played his way into the team, he's probably got the starting job as well. He's one of the best in the league at pushing the ball and running in transition which happens a lot with this offense. Mike James looks like Bobby Jackson part II. Steve Francis sadly looks lost. The only time he's looked good is when he was able to completely dominate the ball (its like watching weird flashbacks from bad Rockets teams of the past)

Battier is Doug Christie part II with a much better jump shot but less ballhandling and not as good of a 1-on-1 defender (although a better help defender and a decent 1-on-1 defender). Scola is looked pretty damn sweet, still can't understand why San Antonio gave him away.

Also, we cut a guy by the name of Mike Harris who looked awesome. Adelman really wanted him but he was a luxury tax casualty (along with having more than 15 players) Sacramento should definitely look into him, reminds me of a sane Bonzi Wells. Speaking of Bonzi, that guy basically went back in time and is looking more in shape than he was in Sacramento and has played very very well.
 
It's definitely coming together. Obviously we don't have the same lockdown defense anymore but there is so much depth on this team that I'm not sure what Adelman will do. Plus Yao has looked awesome in the high post. He's as good as anyone at finding cutters and finding slick ways to get the ball to cutters (helps being taller than everyone else) and his jumper has been very reliable.

And man, a few months ago, we were all saying bye bye to Rafer Alston, but that guy not only played his way into the team, he's probably got the starting job as well. He's one of the best in the league at pushing the ball and running in transition which happens a lot with this offense. Mike James looks like Bobby Jackson part II. Steve Francis sadly looks lost. The only time he's looked good is when he was able to completely dominate the ball (its like watching weird flashbacks from bad Rockets teams of the past)

Battier is Doug Christie part II with a much better jump shot but less ballhandling and not as good of a 1-on-1 defender (although a better help defender and a decent 1-on-1 defender). Scola is looked pretty damn sweet, still can't understand why San Antonio gave him away.

Also, we cut a guy by the name of Mike Harris who looked awesome. Adelman really wanted him but he was a luxury tax casualty (along with having more than 15 players) Sacramento should definitely look into him, reminds me of a sane Bonzi Wells. Speaking of Bonzi, that guy basically went back in time and is looking more in shape than he was in Sacramento and has played very very well.

Don't compare Rockets with the old Kings because we were the best team in the NBA and You are not at least not yet.

Here is what You need to know about RA.

If RA can get away with 7 man rotation he won't use 8. You can be 12 deep all You want - irrelevant
RA - doesn't do rookies
RA goes with what works - no experimenting

once You accept that - You will have fun watching Your team
 
Actually, I think Adelman does do rookies, and is willing to experiment. However, when he finds a rotation he likes, he sticks with those guys (which is actually a positive thing in most cases). It does mean that a rookie might not get much playing time, although Scola will for sure. It also might mean that when somebody is playing poorly they won't necessarily get benched.

I'll be rooting for the Rockets to do well this year. Hopefully Rockets fans don't have expectations of a championship. I'd say they're a year or two away from thinking about that realistically. They just need to win a playoff series and get experience together in the system.
 
Adelman's "doesn't play the rooks" rep in these parts is more than a little silly. Anybody here hear of some guy named Jason Williams? He won't play them just to play them though. Scola should get a ton of minutes (still not buying Hayes as an Adelman guy). Brooks none at all behind all those vets.

Interesting question for me is with Alston apparently responding to Rick, what happens now to Franchise? Rick doesn't do 10 man rotations. Yao/Scola/Battier/TMac/Alston + James/Bonzi = 7. At most there will be another 1 1/2 guys in the rotation, and James and Bonzi are both guards (mostly). Has Stevie come home only to ride pine?
 
i wonder adelman will use their pg's... how healthy is francis? if he can play up to speed they should be fine with him and james...
 
Adelman's "doesn't play the rooks" rep in these parts is more than a little silly. Anybody here hear of some guy named Jason Williams? He won't play them just to play them though. Scola should get a ton of minutes (still not buying Hayes as an Adelman guy). Brooks none at all behind all those vets.

Interesting question for me is with Alston apparently responding to Rick, what happens now to Franchise? Rick doesn't do 10 man rotations. Yao/Scola/Battier/TMac/Alston + James/Bonzi = 7. At most there will be another 1 1/2 guys in the rotation, and James and Bonzi are both guards (mostly). Has Stevie come home only to ride pine?

It looks like he has. Steve has looked pretty bad. Granted he's primarily a 2 guard at this point. Kyle freaking Lowry torched him yesterday when he was playing point guard. James and Alston will be playing almost all the PG minutes with Francis filling in here and there. The 2 guard rotation will be T-Mac/Bonzi/Francis with T-Mac and Bonzi also swinging over to the SF spot.

As for Hayes, he has to get minutes. We don't have another PF. And he's looked all right so far. He fits into the system better than you would think. He plays the pick and roll very well with T-Mac (they did it all the time last year) and he's a pretty good passer from the high post. But Adelman likes Scola, I wouldn't be surprised if he starts.

Also, this talk of 7 man rotations doesn't even make sense. No coach is stupid enough to have a rotation that small. I remember the Kings back in the day and their rotations weren't that small. hell one year they had 7 guys average double figures with some other guys off of the bench. Plus I'll believe it when I see it, JVG, IMO, was far more strict with his rotations.

Finally as for comparing them to the Kings, no the Rockets nowhere near those teams. Talent wise, they're with those Kings teams but the Rockets don't have a command of that offense and they'll only do well once they can master Adelman's offense. So until then, of course they aren't like the Kings.
 
We were an 8 man rotation right through the peak years. Five starters, and then BJax, Hedo, Pollard off the bench. The reason we had 7 double figure scorers was precisely becuse Rick kept the bench so tight and so consistent. They were all averaging 20+min. Ironically the tight rotatins led many people to come to the false conclusion that he was overplaying the starters. But that wasn't the deal. The starters minutes were fairly normal, and only rarely did we have somebody pop into the Top 20 in the league in minutes played. What WAS exceptional was the concentration fo the minutes in the top benchers. He fouond a crew he could trust, and those were his guys, every game.

He'll probably have a looser rotation in the early going with you guys, much like he did in the early Bench Mob days here. But once he gets a feel for who he can trust and not...the guys he can trust WILL domiante the minutes on the team. And everybody else will jsut be garbagetime. One of the reasons I think he has been so successful with so many ego probelm type players. Once he decides he trusts you, that you're his guy, then you're his guy. And he'll put you out there, good game, bad game, whatever. No quick hooks, experiments, yanking guys in anger. Once he finds the core crew, they will get the minutes, and he's going to trust them nearly every time out. And he's willing to sacrifice the one game where they play badly to keep the choesiveness/chemistry for the next one. Drives some people up the wall. ;)

Of course one place you have an "advantage" just like we did is in being extremely injury prone. That always allowed more guys to get more minutes (on average) as guys subbed in for the endless stream of rotation guys who were out. That's where our depth for many of those years paid off. If we'd been completely healthy, guys 9-12 would hardly have mattered.
 
"I don't necessarily care about all the talent we have," McGrady says. "We have to become a great team. Guys who can score the ball might have to do something else.

"We've got a lot of talent, but who knows? We might have some guys bitching about playing time. We might have some guys bitching about shots. If we can get guys to sacrifice, then maybe we can become a great team."

It's good to hear McGrady say that, because I'm pretty sure by mid December somebody in the back-court will be on the bench crying about playing time and shots.
 
It's good to hear McGrady say that, because I'm pretty sure by mid December somebody in the back-court will be on the bench crying about playing time and shots.

Nope, it'll be much quicker. Steve Francis is pretty much out of the rotation at this point. The last preseason game was supposed to show what our rotation would look like. Francis played a grand total of zero minutes.

From the look of it, we had a nine man rotation of Yao, Scola, Battier, McGrady, Alston, James, Hayes, Head, and Wells. (Mutombo would probably get a handful of minutes at the center position but it looks like Scola will be playing a good chunk at the five spot)
 
Taking a dominant low post guy and putting him up high doesn't seem like the best thing to do IMO.
There's no reason to believe that Yao won't go down low and post up when appropriate and necessary. But with him having stamina and injury issues, relieving him of some of his low post duties and putting him in the high post where his passing and shooting skills can be better utilized is actually going to pay off in more ways than one.

You'll probably see this Rockets team go from being a 90ppg offense to, by the end of the season, a 100pg offense. It won't be because one of the role players steps up and becomes a consistent 15-18ppg player, although that could happen also. It will be because they will become a more efficient and free-flowing offense. The guards will get more open looks, the slashers will get more layups and dunks, and McGrady and Yao will have more energy and vitality at the end of games, not to mention the season. The offense that Rick is putting in down there is going to greatly improve that team's ability to win games, and it's going to help those players' careers.
 
Houston might be different, the other teams didnt have this kind of talent. When you have Yao and TMac you are automatially a contender every year. That team has managed to under perform consistently and if you believe in Van Gundy then Stern had a hand in it ;)
 
no matter how good the rosters were, adelman has never had a good first season. golden state, portland, sacramento... houston?

Um...that's just not right.

Pre/post Adelman arrivals:

Portland 88-89: 39-43
Portland 89-90: 59-23 (+20wins, NBA Finals trip)

Golden State 94-95: 26-56
Golden State 95-96: 36-46 (+10wins)

Sacramento 97-98: 27-55
Sacramento 98-99: 27-23 (44-38 pace, would have been +17wins)

Portland is slightly fuzzed, because Adelman took over midseason for them as an interim coach his first year in 88-89. But his first full year was a huge success, and resulted int hem meeting the Bad Boys in the NBA Finals. His first year in Golden State was the best record they had in an 8 year stretch between 94-02. And his first year in Sacramento was the year that changed everything, and the first winning record in the 14 years (at that time) of the Sacramento Kings era.
 
Last edited:
Um...that's just not right.

Pre/post Adelman arrivals:

Portland 88-89: 39-43
Portland 89-90: 59-23 (+20wins, NBA Finals trip)

Golden State 94-95: 26-56
Golden State 95-96: 36-46 (+10wins)

Sacramento 97-98: 27-55
Sacramento 98-99: 27-23 (44-38 pace, would have been +17wins)

Portland is slightly fuzzed, because Adelman took over midseason for them as an interim coach his first year in 88-89. But his first full year was a huge success, and resulted int hem meeting the Bad Boys in the NBA Finals. His first year in Golden State was the best record they had in an 8 year stretch between 94-02. And his first year in Sacramento was the year that changed everything, and the first winning record in the 14 years (at that time) of the Sacramento Kings era.
adelman first seasons
portland 14-21
g.s. 36-46
sacramento 27-23

he had good players on all of those teams. he had some success, but not the kind that people are saying he'll have with the rockets. you can erase partial seasons if you like, but i don't want to when i create my opinion/prediction.

i think the rockets have moderate success. they'll cut down their defense and add to their offense. problem is that they do not have a guy that wants the ball in the clutch except maybe steve francis (and that's suicide) and mcgrady (he'll be covered).
 
adelman first seasons
portland 14-21
g.s. 36-46
sacramento 27-23

he had good players on all of those teams. he had some success, but not the kind that people are saying he'll have with the rockets. you can erase partial seasons if you like, but i don't want to when i create my opinion/prediction.

i think the rockets have moderate success. they'll cut down their defense and add to their offense. problem is that they do not have a guy that wants the ball in the clutch except maybe steve francis (and that's suicide) and mcgrady (he'll be covered).

It's such a silly point though. So he's a bad coach his first year and good his second? Maybe that's an indictment of the length of time necessary to transition into his system? Either way, this is the only team he's inherited that was good before he got there. Every other team has been a bottom up improvement. I think it doesn't make too much sense to compare them to the past. There are too many variables.

As for the clutchness things, that's a moot point. Good players get the ball when they need to and they win. McGrady has always taken the last shot. Who took the game winning shot against Dallas in Game 2 of the playoffs. Yeah that was T-Mac and everyone knew he was getting the ball. Same thing happened in games last year. This concern isn't unique to the Rockets anyway. All teams with superstars have this concern and they manage to do fine.

Also to be fair to Steve, when he was with the Rockets back in the day, he came up big a lot of the time. (granted he's not the same player anymore)
 
adelman first seasons
portland 14-21
g.s. 36-46
sacramento 27-23

he had good players on all of those teams. he had some success, but not the kind that people are saying he'll have with the rockets. you can erase partial seasons if you like, but i don't want to when i create my opinion/prediction.

i think the rockets have moderate success. they'll cut down their defense and add to their offense. problem is that they do not have a guy that wants the ball in the clutch except maybe steve francis (and that's suicide) and mcgrady (he'll be covered).


I know as a Spurs fan you have a vested interest in Adelman not succeeding too wildly, but your analytical approach there is considerably flawed. Pop had a lousy first year. Do you think for one moment that that means if he were to walk into Boston tommorow as the new coach that he would have a lousy season? Of course not.

And choosing to ignore the interim status is just silly. A rookie interim coach is taking over a mess, has no practice time to institute his own system, is working with another coach's assistants, and in general the situation is almost completely inapplicable to a coach (let alone a 17yr veteran) taking over a team and having a full summer, training camp, etc. to implement what he wants to do.

Adelman's history has been of anything but a slow starter. If the Rockets win less than 61 this year it will be the smallest bump he's had yet in his first full year. I think that likely given that this is the best team he's taken over (recordwise). But I included the +/- over the previous seasons for a reason: Teams get considerably better considerably quick when Rick hits town.
 
It's such a silly point though. So he's a bad coach his first year and good his second? Maybe that's an indictment of the length of time necessary to transition into his system?

Exactly. Not too many coaches take their team's to the NBA Finals in the first year that they're there. I can only think of two (Larry Brown and Phil Jackson), and they're considered two of the best basketball coaches of all time.

Most of the time, a coach alone is not going to drastically improve a team in just one year. Now, if the coach sucks, you'll see a major drop-off, but most of the time, it takes even a good coach two or three years to really get a team playing the way he needs them to. Not to mention getting his style of players drafted and signed. Major improvement in two years is actually a testament to how good a coach is; it's a compliment.
 
Change will do the Rockets good

http://www.fannation.com/blogs/post/72657

By Chris Mannix

Houston has been one of the NBA's strongest franchises during the last four seasons, winning a combined 182 games, including 52 last season. Sure, the Rockets have been victimized by first-round flameouts in three of the last four seasons (with a year out of the playoffs mixed in), but in a loaded Western Conference, that's hardly a reason to hang your head.
Still, Rockets general manager Daryl Morey felt the team needed a change after last season's playoff loss to Utah. Out was defensive-minded coach Jeff Van Gundy. In was offensive guru Rick Adelman.
"We were looking for more balance," Morey said. "When Tracy [McGrady] wasn't in the game last season, we had no chance of winning. And the teams that have won championships have excelled at both offense and defense."
I had a chance to study the Rockets recently while reporting a story for Sports Illustrated. I came away impressed. So here are four reasons why I think the Rockets will be successful this season.
1. The Rockets have weapons
Adelman wasn't the only offseason addition. Morey made it a priority to add more dynamic offensive players, bringing Steve Francis and Mike James back to Houston while acquiring power forward Luis Scola from San Antonio. In addition, Adelman has agreed to wipe the slate clean with Bonzi Wells, who was the oil to Van Gundy's water last season.
And there is that guy named McGrady. During the interview process for the coaching job, Adelman likened McGrady to a young Clyde Drexler.
"He felt he could put Tracy in positions that would maximize his talents," Morey said.
Added McGrady: "It's a perfect fit."
2. They will figure out the offense ... eventually
Patience is going to be the buzzword in Houston.
"It could take until the All-Star break to become instinctive with this offense," forward Shane Battier admitted.
Said guard Luther Head: "I went from sitting and spotting up and waiting on the offense [last season] to trying to be aggressive and picking your spots to get open."
The biggest adjustment is taking place with Yao Ming, who is spending less time in his traditional post position and more time as a facilitator outside, a la Chris Webber, Vlade Divac and Brad Miller under Adelman in Sacramento. So far, so ... eh. Yao, who shot only 45.5 percent in the preseason, has expressed frustration with his new role.
"He's got the toughest job," said Nets guard Jason Kidd, who played in a similar offense in New Jersey in 2001 and '02. "In that offense, he becomes a playmaker. He has to understand everybody's cuts."
Adelman's offense, which was annually among the league's best in Sacramento, is a spread-the-wealth type of system that is in stark contrast to Van Gundy's approach of featuring Yao in the post and McGrady in clear-outs.
"Everyone shares the ball and everyone has a chance to make decisions," Battier said. "If you have any basketball IQ at all, it's a fun offense."
3. That said, Yao will grow to like it
There is a reason Miller, Divac and Webber were All-Stars under Adelman: The system works.
"Yao has that same unselfish approach Miller and Vlade had," Grizzlies coach Marc Iavaroni said. "He has very good passing skills and he has to be respected for his shooting, so defenders can't overplay the passing lanes."
Certainly there will be an adjustment period -- "It took me almost a year to learn it," Nets center Jason Collins said -- but if Yao has patience and Adelman continues to feed him in the post (which he will), this offense will add an entirely new dimension to Yao's game.
4. The defense will suffer -- but not really
Morey was quick to correct me when I suggested that the defense might suffer as a result of Adelman's free-wheeling offense. When I pointed out that the Kings frequently ranked in the bottom third of the league in scoring defense, Morey directed me toward Sacramento's defensive points per possession numbers, which were actually much better. According to Morey, the Kings ranked among the top five teams in the league in defensive points per possession for four years under Adelman.
Morey is right. Sort of. Yes, the Rockets will surrender more points, but that will be a byproduct of an offense that increases the number of possessions.
"Up-tempo games are going to get scattered a little more because they are scattering people," Iavaroni said. "They are going to defend more possessions because they are trying to get more possessions."
What has been helpful is that Adelman is not trying to change the way the Rockets play defense, asking players opinions on defensive strategies and talking to them about the ways they have defended certain players in the past.
 
After watching that game...you guys still need a PG.

The end.

We need a bloody offense. Every time we tried running an Adelman set, we looked like crap and every time we ran ISO/JVG stuff, we looked great. (granted we're running it faster and stopping teams from having double teams) Yao sucks in the high post right now. No one knows when to cut properly.

The only difference is we have better transition offense. I like the faster offense and execution

Horrible game, bad execution on both ends. But I figure it will get better over time.

Also, Rafer still can't shoot. Mike James still shoots too much. Steve Francis is fat. Somethings never change... Although to be fair, Rafer sucks at everything but Rafer was always great about turnovers. This was an abberation.
 
Last edited:
I know as a Spurs fan you have a vested interest in Adelman not succeeding too wildly, but your analytical approach there is considerably flawed. Pop had a lousy first year. Do you think for one moment that that means if he were to walk into Boston tommorow as the new coach that he would have a lousy season? Of course not.
pop's system is very hard for even really good players to learn. i would not surprise me if the celtics would have a worse record had pop been coaching them this season.
And choosing to ignore the interim status is just silly. A rookie interim coach is taking over a mess, has no practice time to institute his own system, is working with another coach's assistants, and in general the situation is almost completely inapplicable to a coach (let alone a 17yr veteran) taking over a team and having a full summer, training camp, etc. to implement what he wants to do.
the sample size is so small already. what was i going to do, cut more teams out?
Adelman's history has been of anything but a slow starter. If the Rockets win less than 61 this year it will be the smallest bump he's had yet in his first full year. I think that likely given that this is the best team he's taken over (recordwise). But I included the +/- over the previous seasons for a reason: Teams get considerably better considerably quick when Rick hits town.
slow start - they've lost 12 of their first 24 games. just thought i'd bump the thread to pat myself on the back.
 
Back
Top