because we played better without Fox. Our defense today was not good.
Certainly a take that all our bad defense today was because of Fox.
because we played better without Fox. Our defense today was not good.
Especially when our DRTG was 104.1 today with Fox on the floor (our DRTG for the entire game was 116.7). As a comparison, Monk’s DRTG was 124.4 today.Certainly a take that all our bad defense today was because of Fox.
I believe I had that.I'll bet they would have conveniently ignored the fact that Fox played in the first three games of the streak, too.
Certainly a take that all our bad defense today was because of Fox.
Keon > Fox >>> Monk defensively.
I think ultimately we see Fox and Carter starting but that is likely next year. In the meantime maybe get Keon in there and let Monk and Carter cook while those two rest. Then maybe you have Monk/Carter/Kev/Keegan/Domas before you get Keegan and Domas some rest while the others rotate in.
Those numbers definitely don't appear to support the notion that Fox is a good defender (which I'm not even sure anyone has said), but still clearly better than Monk. I'm not even sure it's particularly close.not using my stats but I don’t think you can say Fox is >>> than Monk
Defense
D-EPM: Fox = +0.1 / Monk = -0.9
D-DARKO: Fox = +0.0 / Monk = -1.1
D-LEBRON: Fox = -0.3 / Monk = -0.1
D-RAPM: Fox = -0.3 / Monk = -2.0
D-VPM: Fox = -0.1 / Monk = -0.5
Ok maybe I've spoken a bit too hastily earlier. I guess my longer winded answer would be, if there is a deal to get us a wing that can fix our length problem, I would consider giving them Monk.Monk and Fox are just not players I’d be rushing to trade. You’ll find out very quickly how much one or the other is missed IMO. Having two of them pretty much guarantees playing with some sort of pace and creation that not every team can say they have. The Warriors are literally begging for another shot creator next to curry and would die for Monk or Fox
I don’t recall saying that. I believe I said the team plays better defense without him.
Horton-Tucker on that Oliver Miller diet.
Those numbers definitely don't appear to support the notion that Fox is a good defender (which I'm not even sure anyone has said), but still clearly better than Monk. I'm not even sure it's particularly close.
Doug did say he is our best defender because of “his ability to sit down and guard”.
I do wish Fox would give more consistent effort on that end, maybe we will see it more as he gets less minutes with Carter back
You wouldn’t know it from reading this thread thoughSometimes i look out the window to make sure the Beam was really lit. We've really won 7 in a row.
Those numbers definitely don't appear to support the notion that Fox is a good defender (which I'm not even sure anyone has said), but still clearly better than Monk. I'm not even sure it's particularly close.
Doug did say he is our best defender because of “his ability to sit down and guard”.
I do wish Fox would give more consistent effort on that end, maybe we will see it more as he gets less minutes with Carter back
Team plays better defense without him=Fox is the reason we play bad defense.
You can say it, it's fine. Have conviction in your take
Those numbers definitely don't appear to support the notion that Fox is a good defender (which I'm not even sure anyone has said), but still clearly better than Monk. I'm not even sure it's particularly close.
It might be better to look at those metrics in terms of rank to help drive home that point…someone said Fox >>>> Monk.
I think it’s more Fox > Monk
if you go by Net Rating it’s
Monk 110.6
Fox 111.6
the problem is when you have
Malik
Fox
Domas
DDR
all on the court together you have 4 of our worst defenders on the team on the court. With Domas and DDR you don’t have many other options.
You wouldn’t know it from reading this thread though
Also, why are we even having this conversation during a 7-game winning streak? Whatever switch Christie flipped, it's working. Let's continue to build off this success, invest in the top 8 of the rotation and see where it goes
In the short-term ( meaning this trade deadline), you look to trade Huerter for a backup wing or backup big. Jval, Bob Williams, cody Martin, caleb Martin. Someone in that vein to get a depth piece where we are weak. I don't want to see any major shakeups *at this point* before the deadline
There is no social media post regarding DPOG yesterday, could be because we weren't so good in defense? It's 2nd time it happens in the DC era, first was in the first victory vs Dallas.
Another thing that I noticed via the Kings social media, they had DDR return to Chicago in the spotlight, hugging his former teammates etc, and away from all cameras I could see Duarte speaking to Sabonis and just Sabonis. The clip was short so perhaps there were other players talking to him, and I watched the match without "commercial breaks" due to delay to know if there was any mention to Duarte at all. He had a connection with Domas because they were playing together in Indy (and he had a great rookie season there, we were hoping he might "resurrect" his career in Sacramento) and also because Domas is fluent in Spanish having spent many years there (his father was playing in Spain).
we are having it because win or lose this roster remains unbalanced and extremely guard heavy.
we have had this problem for 3 years and have not addressed it. We aren’t playing fantasy basketball here. We are dangerously thin across the front line. The same people who cheer supporting best available also fail to recognize loading up on guards drives the need to make a trade. When we reach the play-offs the opponents won’t be sitting their best player.
sometimes I honestly think you are Monte posting anonymously.
we are having it because win or lose this roster remains unbalanced and extremely guard heavy.
we have had this problem for 3 years and have not addressed it. We aren’t playing fantasy basketball here. We are dangerously thin across the front line. The same people who cheer supporting best available also fail to recognize loading up on guards drives the need to make a trade. When we reach the play-offs the opponents won’t be sitting their best player.
sometimes I honestly think you are Monte posting anonymously.
But we have Len and he is a very serviceable center, but haven't played him much during this run. Being "guard heavy" maybe actually be part of our success.we are having it because win or lose this roster remains unbalanced and extremely guard heavy.
we have had this problem for 3 years and have not addressed it. We aren’t playing fantasy basketball here. We are dangerously thin across the front line. The same people who cheer supporting best available also fail to recognize loading up on guards drives the need to make a trade. When we reach the play-offs the opponents won’t be sitting their best player.
sometimes I honestly think you are Monte posting anonymously.
I can't speak for everybody, but I'd say posters like @The_Jamal and myself certainly recognize the need to make a trade. We just think you're wrong in your assessment of this as a holistic problem. Plain and simple. We're of the opinion that you take BPA in the draft and sort out any roster imbalance later. If you're in the top half of the first round especially, you do not look to the draft to fill a need. You simply don't have enough information about who these players will become in order to draft based on need. Keegan did not profile as a lockdown point-of-attack defender coming out of college, yet he's checking guards with regularity in the NBA and having great success preventing access to the paint. He's filled a need that nobody even expected him to fill when he was drafted. You don't know what you don't know when you're picking these guys. Monte took BPA and the rest is sorting itself out.
I'll concede that Monte's inability to correct the roster's imbalances to this point is unfortunate, but the Kings are currently sitting on back-to-back winning seasons, with a third on the way if their current pace holds. That's due in large part to drafting BPA. Picking Tyrese Haliburton despite De'Aaron Fox's presence on the roster set up the trade for Domantas Sabonis, which was the single most consequential trade in Sacramento Kings history after the Richmond-for-Webber swap. Davion Mitchell didn't pan out, which is a bummer, but Keegan Murray is a starting-caliber wing who has already become an essential part of the team's core, and Devin Carter is already making a pronounced impact on both ends of the floor in just a handful of games.
That's 3 out of 4 successes in the first round, if you believe in Devin Carter's potential the way I do. Any GM in this league will take that hit rate without blinking. I don't even mind the Davion whiff, because Monte had a hard-nosed individual defender on his board as BPA, which signals to me that he's prioritizing both ends of the floor. I wanted either Jalen Johnson or Moses Moody in that draft. Johnson is living up to his potential this season, yet Moody hasn't been able to crack the rotation regularly for a Golden State team that's desperate for contributors. It's a crap shoot. The draft always has been. But Monte's philosophy in the draft has been solid. Take BPA, value two-way talent, seek opportunistic trades when there's roster overlap.