Did fox’s cotract situation change when I wasn’t looking?Always has to be somebody, just surprised it's Fox. Would figure on either DDR or Keegan getting hit full on first. I guess the Klutch stuff is probably the deciding factor.
Fox and Carter are both really strong for their size which probably helps more against Bouncy Klay and Not-Allowed-On-Campus.Small sample size, but so far it feels like Fox/Carter > Monk/Ellis.
I honestly did not have "Fox becomes obligatory forum scapegoat" on my 2025 bingo card.
Why in the world people are even thinking of trading Fox is some of the most non-Lasagna stuff I've seen in a long time.
It's downright Greek. I mean we're talking like Greek table wine level stuff here.
Fox and Carter are both really strong for their size which probably helps more against Bouncy Klay and Not-Allowed-On-Campus.
Did fox’s cotract situation change when I wasn’t looking?
just because they’ve been playing well lately doesn’t change the fact that he’s our best option for pulling in a haul. IMO, our best option for getting better is to trade Fox. If not Fox who else, cause I assumed that we al know that the status quo will not make this team better.
You can safely assume that when Monte drafted Devin Carter, Fox was clearly "in the plans".Fox and Carter is an inevitability if Fox is in the plans.
Or instead of looking for a haul to build for the future, we could keep a top 20 player in the league and try to win some time in the next couple of years.Did fox’s cotract situation change when I wasn’t looking?
just because they’ve been playing well lately doesn’t change the fact that he’s our best option for pulling in a haul. IMO, our best option for getting better is to trade Fox. If not Fox who else, cause I assumed that we al know that the status quo will not make this team better.
I mean, if they're going to give Vučević Shaq's whistle... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Domas is also having one of his worst defensive nights in a while.
Or instead of looking for a haul to build for the future, we could keep a top 20 player in the league and try to win some time in the next couple of years.
I don't mean to call anybody out, but it is clearly a case where some of us Kings fans have never been close enough to sniff the Larry O'Brien thus they never build up the winning habits, which make them hastily see a couple road blocks and decided that a detour is the best course of action.Or instead of looking for a haul to build for the future, we could keep a top 20 player in the league and try to win some time in the next couple of years.
Isn’t this an issue because of Fox and his agent? I’d assume the kings would rather build around Fox but if there is a chance that he can leave the kings with nothing to show for him then I am all for the team trading him.Or instead of looking for a haul to build for the future, we could keep a top 20 player in the league and try to win some time in the next couple of years.
Did fox’s cotract situation change when I wasn’t looking?
just because they’ve been playing well lately doesn’t change the fact that he’s our best option for pulling in a haul. IMO, our best option for getting better is to trade Fox. If not Fox who else, cause I assumed that we al know that the status quo will not make this team better. Or was Christie the only thing that was missing for this team to make a good playoff push?