ESPN: George Karl fired (edited title)

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
When the thing that needs to happen happens 4 months too late, it's hard for me to feel anything but angry about the missed opportunity. We needed to win 9 more games to make the playoffs this year and nothing will convince me that this team couldn't have accomplished that if George Karl was fired in November. And if we did fire George Karl when it first became apparent that he was a terrible fit for this team and we won those 9 additional games, all people would be talking about right now is DeMarcus Cousins' MVP caliber season and Rondo's resurgence and the welcome return of Arco thunder to the playoffs. But it is what it is. Another missed opportunity -- another chance to learn from our (many) mistakes and turn the corner.

The national narrative of course will be that firing yet another coach is just more evidence that the organization is incompetent -- and it's hard to argue otherwise. But what we know that they don't know is that this was a PDA/Mullin/Vivek mistake not a Vlade mistake and what he does next will start to define his GM legacy. I'm holding my breath that the next coaching hire is a step forward. George Karl is right that we need stability here and that starts with the front office (hopefully stabilized now) and a forward thinking coaching hire who'll hopefully run the ship for the next decade or more.
This is what I am really hoping for, just keep a guy, regardless of outcome and let him grow with the team and organization. This needs to be the last head coach for a long long time IMO.
 
I wish him the best of health in the future and a very happy retirement after a successful career.

But there is absolutely no chance I'm going to thank him for trying to run our best player out of town and completely misusing the roster all season, whilst ignoring defense and throwing players under the bus through the media. Not. A. Chance.
 
Yeah, poor George Karl was undermined from the get-go. Right from the moment he decided to try and trade DMC before the ink was dry on his contract. But hey, he was just trying to get rid of the cancer player that destroyed the young and promising careers of all those coaches, from Musselman to Corbin, who went on to have great stints once they were free of the Cuz-shackles.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
http://abc7.com/sports/kings-fire-george-karl/1291348/

New name added to our list of "interested in": Nate McMillan
Interesting. Nate McMillan has been at the top of my coaching wishlist for years. I had thought his connections to George Karl would take him out of consideration, but if he is an option, he's right up there with Thibs for me. I really liked the teams he coached in Seattle and Portland. He also has experience coaching for Team USA.
 
Interesting. Nate McMillan has been at the top of my coaching wishlist for years. I had thought his connections to George Karl would take him out of consideration, but if he is an option, he's right up there with Thibs for me. I really liked the teams he coached in Seattle and Portland. He also has experience coaching for Team USA.
He missed the playoffs 3 of 5 years in Seattle and 4 of 7 in Portland. In the 5 years he did make the playoffs he only made it out of the first round once. Not all on him and id prefer him to some of the other options but he hasn't had s ton of success.
 
Interesting. Nate McMillan has been at the top of my coaching wishlist for years. I had thought his connections to George Karl would take him out of consideration, but if he is an option, he's right up there with Thibs for me. I really liked the teams he coached in Seattle and Portland. He also has experience coaching for Team USA.
I've been hearing from Portland fans that they like him as a person. But offensively his skills are very limited. Lots of ISO ball. Not much in terms of sets.

We need a guy that's going to get the ball moving. Constantly feeding Boogie isn't going to get it done.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
He missed the playoffs 3 of 5 years in Seattle and 4 of 7 in Portland. In the 5 years he did make the playoffs he only made it out of the first round once. Not all on him and id prefer him to some of the other options but he hasn't had s ton of success.
Yes and George Karl made the playoffs in 22 out of 25 seasons before we hired him. Big deal. I was talking more about the way those teams played. He coached an up-tempo offense in Seattle with Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis as the main scorers and then he coached a slow grind-it-out team in Portland that was known for their defense. That team he inherited in Portland was the worst in the league and he got them to 50 wins in three years. More importantly, he completely turned around their "Jailblazer" reputation and made them a respected perennial playoff team without the benefit of a first overall pick (Greg Oden) who couldn't stay on the floor. I think he's a good mix of a player coach who's also a disciplinarian.

Here's a snippet from an article about his work as an assistant coach in Indiana:

Lance Stephenson says McMillan has done wonders with his shot, his confidence and his will.

“He talks to me before every game and makes sure my head is right,” Stephenson says. “He calms me down. He’s just a voice that brings positive thoughts to me even when I’m down. He picks me up.”

But McMillan, in what surely will not come as a surprise to Blazers fans, doesn’t sugarcoat his message. Early in training camp, McMillan brought a practice to a screeching halt with a tongue-lashing because he was displeased with the Pacers’ effort and focus.
That's what we need right? Someone firm enough to back up what he says and demand respect, but also empathetic enough to get in DeMarcus' head and make sure he stays focused. I don't know that he's the best man (or woman) for the job, but I appreciate the work he's done elsewhere and I'm glad he's at least getting an interview.

Here's another good quote about his philosophy:

“I always look at myself daily, during the season and during the offseason, trying to find ways to improve,” he said. “I do believe in what I do and how I think about the game and what has to be done and what’s important.

“That’s teamwork and playing together and being the hardest-working group and everybody believing in one common goal. It’s not about you and it’s not about Nate McMillan. I believe in that, and that won’t change wherever I go.”
 
Last edited:

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
I've been hearing from Portland fans that they like him as a person. But offensively his skills are very limited. Lots of ISO ball. Not much in terms of sets.

We need a guy that's going to get the ball moving. Constantly feeding Boogie isn't going to get it done.
I like the guy but I don't think he'd be a miracle worker for the Kings. He dealt with some tough injuries with the Blazers but he basically just did what he should have. Terry Stotts has these Blazers overachieving. That's what I want. I felt Malone had us overachieving at the start of last season and Boogie gets hurt and they foolishly cut him loose. I'm worried we'll spend too much effort trying to have a splashy name come in instead of finding a Terry Stotts or Brad Stevens. Obviously some of the guys we had this season will not be back but it was a promising lineup on paper and with a less rigid coach that is willing to use the talent he has correctly rather than jam square pegs into round holes I think we would have had success.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
I like the guy but I don't think he'd be a miracle worker for the Kings. He dealt with some tough injuries with the Blazers but he basically just did what he should have. Terry Stotts has these Blazers overachieving. That's what I want. I felt Malone had us overachieving at the start of last season and Boogie gets hurt and they foolishly cut him loose. I'm worried we'll spend too much effort trying to have a splashy name come in instead of finding a Terry Stotts or Brad Stevens. Obviously some of the guys we had this season will not be back but it was a promising lineup on paper and with a less rigid coach that is willing to use the talent he has correctly rather than jam square pegs into round holes I think we would have had success.
Do we need a miracle worker though? We need a steadying influence who's going to get whoever we have on the team to compete every night and play for each other. I don't see why Nate McMillan should be viewed any differently than the myriad assistant coaches being floated as possibilities. Maybe he isn't an offense genius or a defensive guru, but he is a little bit more of a known commodity and what we know about him isn't bad. He wasn't fired from the Sonics, his contract expired and he got a better offer from Portland. I think the contrast in styles between those two teams shows that he is able to adjust to different personnel. And even though he did get fired in Portland, pretty much everyone agrees that it was a spectacular series of events that led there with Greg Oden and Brandon Roy both essentially retiring due to injury at the same time and the patchwork collection of fill-in vets tuning him out and/or playing for their own contracts. Just before that he got 54 wins with Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, 20 year old Nic Batum (in his rookie season), and a half season's worth of Greg Oden. Maybe you remember this differently as a Portland resident, but I don't see how that's less impressive than Terry Stotts winning 44 games this year. Both teams were basically built around 2 stars with a bunch of role-players. And that team was well on it's way to being the best team in the Western Conference before injuries gutted it.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
We don't need a miracle worker although finding one would be wonderful. We need a coach who is a player's coach, who has a few ideas about offense and understand how important defense is. I said it before and will say it again (it's taken from some coach who was great) that a small percentage of coaches influence a team to be great and a few actually hurt a team. All the rest are in the middle. Unfortunately, Karl was a coach, at this time in his career, actually hurt us. Adelman for us was in that upper group.

I don't know much about coaches but at this point if he can get along with the players, we'll be fine. If he drives them on defense we may be very good. I am happy that Vlade has the time to think about all this. I hope he waits until after the playoffs to see if any of the coaches are fired. Let us remember the reality about Malone. Malone was a defensive coach who Boogie and I am sure others really liked. Malone was kinda lost on offense and he wasn't very good at using his time outs. He had a lot of holes in his game that I am sure over time will improve. We did well even with Malone's limitations.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
Do we need a miracle worker though? We need a steadying influence who's going to get whoever we have on the team to compete every night and play for each other. I don't see why Nate McMillan should be viewed any differently than the myriad assistant coaches being floated as possibilities. Maybe he isn't an offense genius or a defensive guru, but he is a little bit more of a known commodity and what we know about him isn't bad. He wasn't fired from the Sonics, his contract expired and he got a better offer from Portland. I think the contrast in styles between those two teams shows that he is able to adjust to different personnel. And even though he did get fired in Portland, pretty much everyone agrees that it was a spectacular series of events that led there with Greg Oden and Brandon Roy both essentially retiring due to injury at the same time and the patchwork collection of fill-in vets tuning him out and/or playing for their own contracts. Just before that he got 54 wins with Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, 20 year old Nic Batum (in his rookie season), and a half season's worth of Greg Oden. Maybe you remember this differently as a Portland resident, but I don't see how that's less impressive than Terry Stotts winning 44 games this year. Both teams were basically built around 2 stars with a bunch of role-players. And that team was well on it's way to being the best team in the Western Conference before injuries gutted it.
TBH, I don't know if we need a miracle worker. We need someone who is not a piece of junk and we need someone who is not a headcase and will war with Cousins rather than adapt to a top 5 talent. Given the Kings track record post-Adelman, that feels like asking for a miracle.

Honestly, I only loosely follow the Blazers, they're unavoidable if you're a Portland sports fan, but this year was pretty different for me. I thought LA and the others bolting was cold blooded, it upset me to some extent, and I left them for dead entering the season. I met this gal who is a big fan in September, and we'd have little fun bets when they played the Kings, which lead to me watching more games and going to more games than usual, and I came to really like this year's team. I don't know the role of coaching but I really thought this was a 25 win team and so Terry Stotts job impressed the heck out of me.

Always liked Nate, I just thought he was a fairly middle of the road coach. He got what was expected out of a team, nothing more, nothing less. Certainly an improvement over most coaches in the Sacramento era. Only Adelman, *possibly* St. Jean in 1995 and Malone. The only other coach I might muster a nice thing to say about is that Theus got some wins out of a team that should have been tanking. Make of that what you will.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
This team can really burn through coaches. Why would a good coach who has other options want to come to the dumpster fire that is the Kings?
Because the dumpster fire that is the Kings has seen the light. Getting rid of Chris Mullin, Pete D'Allesandro and now George Karl will allow Vlade Divac to finally do things they way they should have been done. I have faith, and I suspect there are coaches out there who do, too, and who will want to come to Sacramento to be a part of the renaissance.
 
I need to come work for you.
If you had Vivek's pockets and knew for a fact that signing Thibs would (1) get the Kings to the playoffs and (2) keep DMC, wouldn't you double other teams offers to get it done? I think the consensus is that with Thibs both goals/achievements are as good as facts, and without him they are highly questionable.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
This team can really burn through coaches. Why would a good coach who has other options want to come to the dumpster fire that is the Kings?
While the national dimwits can keep on their drumbeat, I do so wish the local fans would take a step back and examine the continuing "dumpster fire" charge nonsense. Now we certainly WERE a dumpster fire. But since Vlade arrived he's been in full fire fighter garb spraying fire retardant everywhere he can reach.

Did anybody else notice that we went the entire season with the exact same 15 man roster, and less exceptionally, with the same coach (did can an assistant). We just reupped Vlade as GM/whatever his official title is. There were still signs of roiling under the surface, but just about every single roil this time was directly centered on Karl. There were no obvious rifts in the front office. The team itself seemed to hold together chemistrywise right until the end.

The source of almost all of the apparent drama last season, whether of his making, or just as a party, was just fired. There have been few signs of instability elsewhere, let alone dumpster fire.

Whether prospective coaches will perceive that or not I do not know, but Vlade radiates a certain level of calm that could help sell it.
 
Last edited:
If you had Vivek's pockets and knew for a fact that signing Thibs would (1) get the Kings to the playoffs and (2) keep DMC, wouldn't you double other teams offers to get it done? I think the consensus is that with Thibs both goals/achievements are as good as facts, and without him they are highly questionable.
Easier said than done. How many of our fired coaches are we still paying? We are bleeding money in the coaching department and I am not sure that Vivek will be willing to fork over that much money, even for Thibs (nor do I think its realistic for us, but that's another matter). Mchale or McMillan would be great alternatives. I'm not a huge fan of Scott Brooks (I don't think he's a great coach, just happened to have 2 future hall of famers on his team), Thibs will have every single team after him and will most likely get to pick where he wants to go. A dark horse could be David Blatt, but I haven't really heard anything about him related to us.
 
It's 3 years late but finally a clean slate!

Over to you Vlade! Make it count as unfortunately you can't screw this up. We used up all of our chances and this literally is the last shot. Simply cannot get it wrong! The pressure is on but if he is given all the freedom to do his job, Vlade will make it right!
 
We rushed into hiring Karl on the "evaluate players or implement a new system" premise and it was an absolute disaster.

People still defending Karl or thinking teams are lining up for him are badly misreading this situation. No one wanted him when we got him, why would a disastrous stint here make him higher in demand?
I disagree about the rushing into signing Karl. I remember the speculation of getting him went on for ages on here.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
The reports coming out this week say Milwaukee is sticking with Kidd, Chicago isn't ready to make a coaching change quite yet, Phil Jackson still likes Rambis, and the Lakers are likely to keep Byron Scott out of appreciation of his shepharding Kobe's coronation year. The Cleveland job is apparently Mark Jackson's if he wants it vis-a-vis Lebron, Phoenix seems happy with the job Earl Watson did since taking over and it remains all quiet on the Philadelphia and New Orleans fronts. So maybe the competition won't be quite as fierce as I initially projected. Minnesota, Houston, Washington and Brooklyn look like our main competition for the top coaches.
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
The reports coming out this week say Milwaukee is sticking with Kidd, Chicago isn't ready to make a coaching change quite yet, Phil Jackson still likes Rambis, and the Lakers are likely to keep Byron Scott out of appreciation of his shepharding Kobe's coronation year. The Cleveland job is apparently Mark Jackson's if he wants it vis-a-vis Lebron, Phoenix seems happy with the job Earl Watson did since taking over and it remains all quiet on the Philadelphia and New Orleans fronts. So maybe the competition won't be quite as fierce as I initially projected. Minnesota, Houston, Washington and Brooklyn look like our main competition for the top coaches.
Rumours are 76ers might hire Mike Dantni and fire the current coach if any team makes a offer for MDA
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
Rumours are 76ers might hire Mike Dantni and fire the current coach if any team makes a offer for MDA
Oh yeah, I did read that it just slipped my mind. Makes sense. Bryan Colangelo is running the show now and he's the guy that hired Mike D'Antoni in Phoenix. Also that team is at least competent defensively but can't score so you can see why they would talk themselves into it.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Rumours are 76ers might hire Mike Dantni and fire the current coach if any team makes a offer for MDA
All of which actually helps us. Means the Sixers are truly off the general market, and it protects us from any D'Antoni foolishness, not thatI think Vlade is looking in that direction at all.

Right now only a few teams have moved quickly onto the market. Vlade says he'll start making calls on Monday. Would be great to be into the process before playoff teams like Houston get bounced and potentially start looking.

Of the lottery teams:

Not Changing
Bulls
Jazz
Magic
Nuggets

Holding Pattern
Pelicans
76ers
Lakers
Knicks
Bucks

Delayed Announcement
Suns
Nets

Already in Market
Kings
Timberwolves
Wizards

If the Suns want to slip into a holding pattern over Earl Watson, hey, be my guest. Everybody knows the Nets are a competitor however.


In any case, if we can move quickly before some of those other teams start filtering in. Especially before any premade playoff teams hit the market, we up at our chances at scoring a strong coach. Only the Wolves of the teams already committed have an obviously stronger position, and you have to freeze your ass off for it.