Being an ex-baseball player I have my thoughts on Beane. All I'll say publicly is that what Beane does in baseball, will fail most of the time in basketball. Personally I don't like it in baseball. Beane hasn't won any championships. The best he can do is get into the playoffs and go out in the first round. You can never have a favorite player because as soon as he's developed into a good player, he's traded for another prospect that you have to develop. No Reggie Jacksons or Mark McQuire's. No Sal Bando's or Ricky Hendersons. Those were the A's teams I rooted for. No more.
Basketball, more so than baseball requires chemistry. The players have to play together for a while to become a team. So constantly changing out the parts doesn't work. Oh wait, that's what we've been doing isn't it? OK, now at least I know why were not winning.
Analytics will always have a bigger place in baseball than basketball. Baseball is an anomaly in many ways but the biggest one for me is that it is at the same time the most team oriented game AND the most individual based of team sports.
It's a true team game in the sense that no matter how good a single player he can't have the same impact as a superstar in the NBA or an all-Pro quarterback (and to a lesser extent WR, RB, pass rusher, CB etc) in the NFL. A pitcher can be utterly dominant but only once every four or five games.
And yet baseball is the most individual sport in that each at bat is a solitary contest between pitcher and batter. Even defensively there isn't a ton of teamwork required outside of the pitcher/catcher dynamic and I suppose the little things like turning a double play, hitting the cutoff man etc. Point being, you can build a baseball team based on numbers and be fairly confident it will succeed. That is absolutely not the case in basketball.
I'm all for analytics - I think they can be a big PART of a front office making decisions. But you also just need a feel for the game. I have no confidence in our front office's basketball acumen in that regard.