So all these playoff/ big market teams after IT, yet some on here are willing to just let him walk. Yes they want him as a 6th man type, but theres no reason he cant transition to that role for us if and when we are a playoff caliber squad.
So all these playoff/ big market teams after IT, yet some on here are willing to just let him walk. Yes they want him as a 6th man type, but theres no reason he cant transition to that role for us if and when we are a playoff caliber squad.
So all these playoff/ big market teams after IT, yet some on here are willing to just let him walk. Yes they want him as a 6th man type, but theres no reason he cant transition to that role for us if and when we are a playoff caliber squad.
Aaron Bruski @aaronbruski 4m
One thing is clear for Kings management right now. There is no way they can re-sign IT for the numbers they’ve been throwing out there.
Tim MacMahon @espn_macmahon 7m
Mavs source acknowledges contact with Isaiah Thomas but says "not high on our board." Determined to re-sign Devin Harris.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave20m
And doing bystander math, the fact that both DET and BOS have interest in IT may bode well for a Rondo or Smith play.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave19m
I continue to hear that this situation will most likely play out like the Evans deal last year, either IT leaving outright or a minor deal.
The thing about Dallas is that they have to wait for Carmelo to make his choice first. Boston can make a move now and might be pressured into doing so to beat out the secondary rush on IT.
On a bad team yes his ego will come into play, but if we start winning that cures ego's. Do you think Manu would accept a 6th man role on a 20 win team? I like players with the mentality of IT, why should he smile and say nothing playing behind inferior talent, its not like playing behind Vasquez provides wins or better play. People praise Stauskas for having the same cocky attitude, yet IT is critized for it.
They said they were willing to take that risk with Kevin Love, so maybe the same applies with Rondo. Willing to take the risk to land a proven piece to this puzzle
I'm giddy. IT seems to have value which means there might actually be decent sign and trade possibilities that might actually help us. I was worried no one would want him.
Jerry Reynolds you magnificent bastard, you might be right (see quote below).
Even if Rondo walked, we'd have a helluva lot more cap space than we do now. Sign IT and that limits our backcourt flexibility for years. It's IT and little backcourt flexibility for years, or a year of Rondo and he re-signs, or a year of Rondo and immediate backcourt flexibility and more cap space.
On a bad team yes his ego will come into play, but if we start winning that cures ego's. Do you think Manu would accept a 6th man role on a 20 win team? I like players with the mentality of IT, why should he smile and say nothing playing behind inferior talent, its not like playing behind Vasquez provides wins or better play. People praise Stauskas for having the same cocky attitude, yet IT is critized for it.
Going after Rondo with draft picks and Ben McLemore was risky. In a sign and trade for IT, it's a no brainer without other assets involved. With Ben included it's still a risk but considering how badly this team needs a player like Rondo, I could probably be talked into it.
Going after Rondo with draft picks and Ben McLemore was risky. In a sign and trade for IT, it's a no brainer without other assets involved. With Ben included it's still a risk but considering how badly this team needs a player like Rondo, I could probably be talked into it.
Might not have to include Ben. Could possibly offer them Terry's expiring instead. Their frontcourt is also largely poopoo as well so you miiiiight be able to drop them JT
could we even include additional players. Thought S&T of a restricted FA cant be bundled with another player, or in other words cant sign and trade IT along with another one of our players. Anyone know for certain?
I'm giddy. IT seems to have value which means there might actually be decent sign and trade possibilities that might actually help us. I was worried no one would want him.
The only reason to negotiate a sign and trade is to keep the original team from matching.
If reports are true that the Kings have no interest in IT over $7m per year, competing interest from other teams would actually mean there is less of a chance of a S&T since the resulting offer is likely something far over what the Kings would be willing to match.
Even if Rondo walked, we'd have a helluva lot more cap space than we do now. Sign IT and that limits our backcourt flexibility for years. It's IT and little backcourt flexibility for years, or a year of Rondo and he re-signs, or a year of Rondo and immediate backcourt flexibility and more cap space.
That is just living in denial mate. For all his flaws, IT is a good player and one of the top free agents in the league. Teams will look at him and see a good player. Is he a great fit for this team? I don't think so but he will get paid no doubt about it. I think a number of people here thought that he will get offers around $8 million per season. That is what the market is for that player.
I am by no means IT hommie but I am not going to trash him and make him seem like he is lesser player than he really is. He has his flaws but he is no worse than the likes of Hill, Jennings et al who all got a deal in the similar price range that IT will get.
We made a blow not trading him at the deadline or not bringing in a starting PG to keep IT on the bench which would not give him the freedom or chance to put up the numbers he did.