I know the guy has been in a lot of trouble throughout his career, but as some have said maybe he has mellowed with age. Just won this award for community service. Not saying I do or don't want him, but maybe the character issues are not as big an issue as they once were. Just something to think about.
http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2011/01/zach-randolph-receives-nba-community-assist-award/
http://www.nba.com/grizzlies/news/z..._nba_cares_community_assist_award-110114.html
That is almost irrelevant. Seriously.
You take your Kings team with Zbo added, I'll take my Kings team with a guy who actually fits but puts up lesser numbers, and I'll beat you inthat 7 game series.
We have our #1 and #2 options in town. EVERYBODY else who comes ot town a) has to understand that; and b) has to be able to contribute when they aren't shooting the ball. No more dumb volume scorer threads please.
This again goes back to just knowing basketball history. Its not much diferent than the guard positons really. Last year I repeatedly challenged people on the Martin/Evans backcourt to name one longterm successful 20pt/20pt sscoring backcourt. I could do the same thing here -- name me a successful, or for that matter just any, 20pt/20pt frontcourt. Don't waste your time. San Antonio might have had it for one year while Admiral was passing the torch to Duncan. Ditto possibly with Sampson passing the torch to Hakeem in Houston. Then one guy ascended, the other fell back, and notably those duos invoved multiple all time great DEFENSIVE duos. But offensively it doesn't work. Again. Basketball is a spacing game. You could hardly pick a worse player on that front for the PF position for the Kings than Zbo. You worry about Cousins turning into a jumpshooter? Well you can just about guarantee it if you try to stuff a high volume and notoriously selfish post scorer in there. And how exactly is Reke supposed to be able to drive with 600 pounds of beef trying to post up on either side of the lane? You are not only getting the absolute least out of your talent, and your money spent on adding the piece, but you are actively interfering with the natural functioning of the future team.
You can't pair multiple 20ppg bigs in the frontcourt anymore than you can pair multiple 20ppg guards int eh backcourt. Its never worked. One guy or ther other is going to stuffed into an uncomfortable underacheiving secondary role for which they are not suited. And then you are paying a secondary player superstar money. The Twin Towers was a fun name, but they never won it all, and Ralph Sampson's game deteriorated even before his knees as he got squeezed out fo the paint. Admiral politely got old, but he wasn't cloe to 20ppg for most of that pairing. The Magic actually traded Chris Webber away for Penny Hardaway just to avoid a Shaq/Webber frontcourt mess.
That's not how its done folks. There is a long and decorated history of the type of PF you put next to your stud center, and its not some 20ppg defenseless scorer. It is ALWAYS a guy who defends, almost always a guy who rebounds. Its a tough guy, and the hardest dirtworker on the team. Your absolute scoring cap for the guy is 15-17ppg, on the outside. And that is on teams that have no potent perimeter scoring. When you have a star guard as well, that scoring is probably closer to 10-12. These are the guys we are talking about over the years:
Oakley
Haslem
Rodman
Horry
Thorpe
Nance
D. Davis
Green
Rambis
PJ Brown
H. Grant
M. Lucas
B. Jones
T. Cummings *included just to be comprehensive, but clearly the odd man out, and their rep was as softies while he as there. Repace by Rodman, who was then replaced by Duncan. Think they figured something out?
feel free to point out to me the guys who look anything like ZBo as a player. And it should be noted that most of those defensive studs on that list were playing alongside dominant defensive centers. Not all -- Nance wasn't, maybe not Jones. But most of them were great fits even playing alongside a center who cleaned up inside himself. And here we come along, with a young stud center who is notably stronger on the offensive end than the defensive end, and people are seriously trying to argue that the way to go is to find another offensively orented non-defending PF to go next to him? Learn the history. Think about why its always worked the way it has. Two guys can't occupy the same space. A scorer brought in who has his own scoring suppresed or suppreses other's scoring is working at below his capacity, or making the rest of the team operate at below theirs, while doubtless bieng paid as if he was putting up the giant numbers. But a defensive/rebounding roleplaying type guy can play alongside a great center and operate at 100% capacity. Thrive without ever getting in the way. Pat Riley knew this. Phil Jackson knew this. Lenny Wilens, Rudy T... But I suppose people think they've figured out something those guys didn't because they looked at a statsheet and saw lots of pretty numbers.