CAUTION: DANGER AHEAD-Me thinking out loud
I haven't even been posting in this thread, yet I am frustrated. Would Webber have made a difference this year in the playoffs? You'd have to have you head too far up yo....(PG-site, I remember) not to think so, whether you believe the difference would have been positive or negative.
And now we are getting these arguments like "well it was all for the best anyway now we can retool" My biggest fear in all of this is that we wont----well at least for a little while. The Kings renaissance wasn't a one year thing, it was a couple years in the making. And even those teams that can turn things around in one year do so because they have the cap flexibility to do so (prime example: PHX).
I believe the pendulum will swing back our way, but what if its not to 3-4 years down the line? You know when Webber's contract, Dougs Contract or anything that Vlade would have signed would have expired and thus leaving us with lots of $$$ under the cap? Would people still say the trade "was for the best" because we've gotten back to becoming contenders again? In that case we would all have to start subscribing to the "Drafting Pervis Ellison #1 was the right move and all for the best" theory because slowly, yet surely we became the team we wanted.
In any case, nevermind my blabbering. I fully believe the Kings, if not this season, then next, will make a MAJOR change.