N
NBC Sports BayArea
Guest
Can Marvin Bagley III and Draymond Green thrive together in the Warriors' frontcourt? This is interesting ...
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
This article also suggests the Kings send the #12 pick along with MB3After all the Kings are a farm team for the great GSW, right?
Because it's highway robbery and they are of high moral character?Warriors say no.
Because it's highway robbery and they are of high moral character?
Bagley doesn't have this kind of value. The pick is also small potatoes; once you're dealing with picks that high its a tall order to even move up a few spots.
Organizations don't trade Top 3 picks for depreciated 3rd year prospects on the fast track to becoming a bust. They'd usually much rather take a chance on the mystery box. This was also just some musings from a Warriors beat writer; I doubt the organization is seriously considering this.
Especially since this is the team that exploded after they cut out a Bagley-type big. He has no use to a team trying to get back into contention and they wouldn't use him.
I'm surprised many of you guys still value Bagley this highly.
The injuries this past season were a huge disappointment and setback but his only crime in year one was not being Luka.
There's no way to undo the pick. It sucked. Get over it and don't make it worse by sending him to blow up with another team.
Wish I could say I was surprised to see there are still folks determined to see a kid fail all to prove they are smarter than our now ex-GM, to the detriment of the team they are supposed to be fans of.
But I'm not.
How many lottery picks have the Kings had over the last dozen drafts? The answer is 12. And it'd be 13 if Vlade hadn't traded last year's first rounder in that terrible salary dump deal.
And now we think that stocking up on draft picks in maybe the weakest draft since 2000 without a GM in place is the right move?
If this is a Hinkie like tank job then sure. Dump everybody but Fox and take on other team's bad contracts to accumulate assets. But don't load up on this year's draft. Spread those picks over the next few drafts.
And dealing Bagley now is selling low, which would be a very Kangz thing to do. You want to dump Bagley? Fine, let him start next year and put up numbers and get a better deal at the deadline.
Sure, there's a risk he's hurt yet again but in this draft dealing him and #12 for #2 when there's a significant chance the player taken at #12 turns out better than the guy at #2 is a worse risk IMO.
Is there anyone at #2 in this draft (or #6 for that matter) that you believe is a franchise player? Hayes? Ball? Wiseman?
This is one year where I'd rather have a couple late lottery picks than one pick in the top 5 or 6. I think there will be some very good players when all is said and done but I don't see obvious stars at the top.
Ham really pushing these Buddy deals. If they think moving Buddy and keeping Walton is the answer we're heading into another era of some pretty disappointing results that will end up in the same place anyway.
As for a Hawks deal I like Reddish and 6. That would be great value. Adding the 12, eh, that's tough but if it's a salary dump and young talent it makes sense if a rebuild is in order. Of course rebuilding when your core is 27-28 at it's oldest spots and it's two most prominent pieces are about to be maxed spots is pretty stupid. That means somebody really F'd up and I'm not sure it was all the guy they just fired.
They're only keeping Walton so they don't have to hire and fire another coach before the GM/VP whatever gets hired. I'm not as down on Walton as most of the board but I don't see any way he survives the incoming FO shakeup.Ham really pushing these Buddy deals. If they think moving Buddy and keeping Walton is the answer we're heading into another era of some pretty disappointing results that will end up in the same place anyway.