Entity
Hall of Famer
Tell me again, why did we not retain Adelman? I hope the Maloofs have learned their lesson.
He couldn't....Well he was always........uh...........
uhm
oh yeah.....no that was Musselman...hmmm
don't know.
Tell me again, why did we not retain Adelman? I hope the Maloofs have learned their lesson.
Yeah i'd like to see somebody step up and say he shouldn't be fired. LoL at least that would be entertaining. hmmm we should start a positive threa like 6th did not to long ago about saying something nice about a player you don't like. Only this time everybody come up with a reason Reggie should not be fired.
5. The players appear to be very supportive of Reggie. In contrast to the fans, some of whom have hopes of high draft picks, players NEVER want to lose. A season like ours can be discouraging. In the middle of a discouraging season, I'd rather have our players LIKE their coach. At least that's something.
Yeah i'd like to see somebody step up and say he shouldn't be fired. LoL at least that would be entertaining. hmmm we should start a positive threa like 6th did not to long ago about saying something nice about a player you don't like. Only this time everybody come up with a reason Reggie should not be fired.
Tell me again, why did we not retain Adelman? I hope the Maloofs have learned their lesson.
ROFLOL! Hey, Entity, let's not get carried away. I'll agree with a "let's say something nice about Reggie." Well, he is a beautiful dresser. But, saying something about why he should not be fired is just going over the line, don't ya think?![]()
Because Musselman was going to help us play better defense...Oh wait.
Yeah, I was one who wanted Adelman gone at the time. Maybe with all the fat veteran contracts on our roster the Maloofs should have fired Petrie instead.
ROFLOL! Hey, Entity, let's not get carried away. I'll agree with a "let's say something nice about Reggie." Well, he is a beautiful dresser. But, saying something about why he should not be fired is just going over the line, don't ya think?![]()
The Warriors have lost 9 straight and have same exact same record as the Kings (blown out by 35 tonight in San Antonio). Yet, NO ONE, ZERO, in the Bay Area is calling for Nellies head - at least from my observation. I follow the W's quite a bit and listen to a lot of Sports radio over there when traveling to Solano County, and other parts of East Bay where I have some biz. The usual complaints are about not having Monte, gotten rid of Baron, trying to develop chemistry with all the new players, Magettee, Crawford, etc. It might change, but so far Golden State fans seem in a daze or just exceedingly patient.
If you're ready to laugh, here goes:
Reggie should not be fired. I can give you several reasons why Reggie should not be fired:
1. This team is not going to compete for the playoffs this year. There is no available coach out there so good that they will turn us around. Change for change's sake is not particularly useful.
2. We are paying Reggie through the end of the year whether we fire him or not. May as well get his butt on the bench if we're paying him.
3. What we need most to turn this team around is a good, high draft pick. Reggie is well on his way to getting us one.
4. To my eyes, Reggie is doing a decent job of balancing time between the kids and the vets. If we hire somebody else, they'll feel (not surprisingly!!!) MORE pressure to win lest they too get canned. That will translate to MORE time for Salmons and Miller and Jackson and LESS time for Thompson and Greene and Brown as the new coach tries to win more than Reggie did.
5. The players appear to be very supportive of Reggie. In contrast to the fans, some of whom have hopes of high draft picks, players NEVER want to lose. A season like ours can be discouraging. In the middle of a discouraging season, I'd rather have our players LIKE their coach. At least that's something.
There. Five reasons not to fire Reggie. I'm not saying he's a great coach, I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Shoot, I don't even know how to tell, especially given the roster he has to work with. I'm just saying that there doesn't seem to be a lot of upside to firing him to me - aside from placating the voices who are upset with the Kings' record. Not a good enough reason for me.
If you're ready to laugh, here goes:
4. To my eyes, Reggie is doing a decent job of balancing time between the kids and the vets. If we hire somebody else, they'll feel (not surprisingly!!!) MORE pressure to win lest they too get canned. That will translate to MORE time for Salmons and Miller and Jackson and LESS time for Thompson and Greene and Brown as the new coach tries to win more than Reggie did.
Why?! Because the players come out and publicly say they are behind him and want to play for him?!5. The players appear to be very supportive of Reggie. In contrast to the fans, some of whom have hopes of high draft picks, players NEVER want to lose. A season like ours can be discouraging. In the middle of a discouraging season, I'd rather have our players LIKE their coach. At least that's something.
We aren't looking for a coach to turn us around midseason. We're looking for a coach that won't cause us to leap en masse off the Tower Bridge.
With this logic, we shouldn't even be having this discussion because Eric Musselman would still be our coach.
Not really. We also need to develop the skills of the draft picks we have from this year and last year. And we need to see some kind of proof that there's a plan to all this.
If you're making that comment based on looking at the box score, you're really drawing erroneous conclusions. It's not just the minutes; it's the bizarre rotations, the inappropriate timeouts or lack thereof, and more that doesn't show up in the stat lines.
I don't care if the players like the coach or hate his guts. Two players were quoted for that latest article in the Bee and they really couldn't say much else than what was printed. I'd rather have our players RESPECT our coach than like him.
It's NOT about the team record. It's about talking the talk but not walking the walk. It's about a lot more, but I think you get my drift. You really need to find a way to see tonight's game to see just how bad it really was. Rip your heart out and stomp it into the ground bad...
Why?! Because the players come out and publicly say they are behind him and want to play for him?!
Thats a kiss of death if ever there was one. Once players come out standing up for their coach, thats a sign that there IS problems there and that in fact they DON'T want to play for them.
At least you'll go into the game not expecting anything. That might make it easier to take...
Action my friend! Actions! Not words because they mean sweet **** all!Let's take a team in a losing situation, like us.
If players come out and publicly say they don't like the coach, that would mean they don't like the coach.
If players come out and publicly say they like the coach, that means they don't like the coach.
If players don't say anything, they're clearly not willing to stand up for their coach.
Let's take the hypothesis that the players actually DO like the coach. What behavior would you expect them to exhibit?
Yeah i'd like to see somebody step up and say he shouldn't be fired. LoL at least that would be entertaining. hmmm we should start a positive threa like 6th did not to long ago about saying something nice about a player you don't like. Only this time everybody come up with a reason Reggie should not be fired.
Uh, no he's not doing a good job of balancing time btwn the kids and vets. This may be why hiring Whisenant at least for the rest of the season may make sense. Unlike Reggie Theus or his logical interim replacement, Chuck Person, Whiz has no aspirations of being an NBA head coach long term, so he won't be looking over his shoulder for wins and losses. He is a good friend of the Maloofs so he will be more likely to follow the Maloofs lead in developing the kids. I actually would be okay with Whiz for the rest of this season only so the clear directive would be to develop the kids, trade away the vets for expiring contracts, draft picks, and more kids, and go for a big name coach in 2009.
If you're ready to laugh, here goes:
Reggie should not be fired. I can give you several reasons why Reggie should not be fired:
1. This team is not going to compete for the playoffs this year. There is no available coach out there so good that they will turn us around. Change for change's sake is not particularly useful.
2. We are paying Reggie through the end of the year whether we fire him or not. May as well get his butt on the bench if we're paying him.
3. What we need most to turn this team around is a good, high draft pick. Reggie is well on his way to getting us one.
4. To my eyes, Reggie is doing a decent job of balancing time between the kids and the vets. If we hire somebody else, they'll feel (not surprisingly!!!) MORE pressure to win lest they too get canned. That will translate to MORE time for Salmons and Miller and Jackson and LESS time for Thompson and Greene and Brown as the new coach tries to win more than Reggie did.
5. The players appear to be very supportive of Reggie. In contrast to the fans, some of whom have hopes of high draft picks, players NEVER want to lose. A season like ours can be discouraging. In the middle of a discouraging season, I'd rather have our players LIKE their coach. At least that's something.
There. Five reasons not to fire Reggie. I'm not saying he's a great coach, I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Shoot, I don't even know how to tell, especially given the roster he has to work with. I'm just saying that there doesn't seem to be a lot of upside to firing him to me - aside from placating the voices who are upset with the Kings' record. Not a good enough reason for me.
Let's take a team in a losing situation, like us.
If players come out and publicly say they don't like the coach, that would mean they don't like the coach.
If players come out and publicly say they like the coach, that means they don't like the coach.
If players don't say anything, they're clearly not willing to stand up for their coach.
Let's take the hypothesis that the players actually DO like the coach. What behavior would you expect them to exhibit?
I personally don't give a damm whether the players like or dislike Reggie, and he shouldn't care either. What he needs is their respect.