Welcome Ron Artest!!!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter thesanityannex
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't welcome someone who is "forced" (against his will) to come to You

You let him prove himself and You never turn Your back on him because You will get stabbed
 
I'll welcome Ron to the Kings and I will support him. But love him? Nope, he'll have to EARN that. (and I don't trust him as far as Brad can jump vertically.;) )
 
piksi said:
You don't welcome someone who is "forced" (against his will) to come to You

You let him prove himself and You never turn Your back on him because You will get stabbed

yeah, its clear regardless of how much was just his agents bs he did not want to come here. that goes a long way.
 
From Artest's mouth this morning in Indiana it's being reported that he never said he would not report, and he never said he didn't approve the trade. I was telling this to a lot of co workers this morning. It was starting to sound like his agent was doing a lot of bs'ing, and it's coming out he has. I hope Artest's last act of violence is to whoop his agents *** on the way out of town.
 
DocHolliday said:
From Artest's mouth this morning in Indiana it's being reported that he never said he would not report, and he never said he didn't approve the trade. I was telling this to a lot of co workers this morning. It was starting to sound like his agent was doing a lot of bs'ing, and it's coming out he has. I hope Artest's last act of violence is to whoop his agents *** on the way out of town.

And why exactly would his agent do that? I am not saying that was not the case I am just trying to understand the reason.
 
I agree his agent seems like a dumba$$ but Artest gets paid, he gets paid. Im sure Ron is putting any spin on it he can at this point to save face.
 
The agent has a huge stake in Ron's future. I'm sure his agent would have preferred that he go to a big market like LA or NY so that there would be more exposure for Ron, perhaps more endorsements (who would endorse him I'm not sure) and allow him to more readily pursue interests outside of basketball. All of this adds up to more money for Ron, which in turn is more money and exposure for his agent. I'm sure that his agent was the one calling the shots and doing all he could to get Ron on board with his thinking. This happens all the time and I don't think that this is any different. His agent had an agenda and was trying to do what he thought was in the best interest of his client....getting him to a bigger market than Sac.
 
His agent is not a Bartlestein. I thought Bart was the worst of the bunch with hatred towards the Kings. Man, I remember him as being public enemy #1 for kingsfans. It wouldn't surprise me that NBA player agents are the most money-hungry, big market pushing people out there.
 
Diabeticwonder said:
The agent has a huge stake in Ron's future. I'm sure his agent would have preferred that he go to a big market like LA or NY so that there would be more exposure for Ron, perhaps more endorsements (who would endorse him I'm not sure) and allow him to more readily pursue interests outside of basketball. All of this adds up to more money for Ron, which in turn is more money and exposure for his agent. I'm sure that his agent was the one calling the shots and doing all he could to get Ron on board with his thinking. This happens all the time and I don't think that this is any different. His agent had an agenda and was trying to do what he thought was in the best interest of his client....getting him to a bigger market than Sac.

Excellent point but his agent should learn beggars cannot be choosers. They should consider themselves lucky if the deal does in fact go through
 
Diabeticwonder said:
The agent has a huge stake in Ron's future. I'm sure his agent would have preferred that he go to a big market like LA or NY so that there would be more exposure for Ron, perhaps more endorsements (who would endorse him I'm not sure) ....

perhaps the WWF, Shrinks.com, Valium, Circuit City :D
 
The way I understand it is that if he refuses to report Indy can cease paying him and it all winds up in the courts. But if he says "I'll report but I won't like it and will immediately request a trade"... (which makes having him here playing with that attitude obviously counter-productive and raises a huge red flag for us and our future). Essentially he was saying he'd show up but it would be under protest and don't count on him to buy into what we're doing.
 
DeAtHrOw said:
Excellent point but his agent should learn beggars cannot be choosers. They should consider themselves lucky if the deal does in fact go through
I agree completely as would anyone with any real senses about them. However, agents typically believe that they can get whatever they want no matter how far they have to take things. They believe that they have 100% control of every situation like this between a team and a player and that's simply not the case. Just look at the whole TO thing with Philly. Rosenhaus stretched that relationship to the limit and Philly didn't budge. Now, Philly has given Rosenhaus permission to work out a trade. The same thing happened here. Ron's agent thought that he could handcuff the Pacers and get them to do what he wanted them to do and that didn't happen.
 
Rowdyone said:
The way I understand it is that if he refuses to report Indy can cease paying him and it all winds up in the courts. But if he says "I'll report but I won't like it and will immediately request a trade"... (which makes having him here playing with that attitude obviously counter-productive and raises a huge red flag for us and our future). Essentially he was saying he'd show up but it would be under protest and don't count on him to buy into what we're doing.

You're making that sht up, because that has not been reported. He was quoted as saying he would play hard for them. I've been following ESPN NEWS on SIRIUS all day. Not sure where you are getting your info.
 
PFFFT!! said:
perhaps the WWF, Shrinks.com, Valium, Circuit City :D
Forget Circuit City!!! Fry's is much closer to ARCO and I'm sure he could work the morning shift and then just do the 5 min. drive to the arena for game time.
 
Diabeticwonder said:
I agree completely as would anyone with any real senses about them. However, agents typically believe that they can get whatever they want no matter how far they have to take things. They believe that they have 100% control of every situation like this between a team and a player and that's simply not the case. Just look at the whole TO thing with Philly. Rosenhaus stretched that relationship to the limit and Philly didn't budge. Now, Philly has given Rosenhaus permission to work out a trade. The same thing happened here. Ron's agent thought that he could handcuff the Pacers and get them to do what he wanted them to do and that didn't happen.

You are absolutely right. I just wish this ordeal would come to an end one way or another.
 
DocHolliday said:
You're making that sht up, because that has not been reported. He was quoted as saying he would play hard for them. I've been following ESPN NEWS on SIRIUS all day. Not sure where you are getting your info.

Yeh, you got me Doc, I just made it up....Key word here is "was" as in "yesterday" and my sources have been Realgm.com and hoopshype.com and their sources. I'm not saying that this is what he has said today. (part of the problem...his multiple quotes yesterday vs. today and reported by whom). I'm just saying that how he responds to this trade offer has huge legal ramifications since he is contractually obligated for three more years without a trade veto. By refusing to accept the deal he would be breaking his contract but by saying yesterday that he would immediately ask for a trade upon coming to the Kings he has effectively negated the trade since the Kings would be paying for his full services, not half hearted efforts. That's why Indy wanted to talk to him today to have him clarify his position. He has to take the stance that he will report and play hard, as he has today, or else he's breached his contract and will not be paid. But saying it doesn't make it so. That's why the Maloofs want to talk to him, to gauge his sincerity.
 
But all that stuff about him not wanting to come here, or wanting a trade immediately was coming from his agent, who now looks like a big liar.
 
Rowdyone said:
Yeh, you got me Doc, I just made it up....Key word here is "was" as in "yesterday" and my sources have been Realgm.com and hoopshype.com and their sources. I'm not saying that this is what he has said today. (part of the problem...his multiple quotes yesterday vs. today and reported by whom). I'm just saying that how he responds to this trade offer has huge legal ramifications since he is contractually obligated for three more years without a trade veto. By refusing to accept the deal he would be breaking his contract but by saying yesterday that he would immediately ask for a trade upon coming to the Kings he has effectively negated the trade since the Kings would be paying for his full services, not half hearted efforts. That's why Indy wanted to talk to him today to have him clarify his position. He has to take the stance that he will report and play hard, as he has today, or else he's breached his contract and will not be paid. But saying it doesn't make it so. That's why the Maloofs want to talk to him, to gauge his sincerity.

Ya, but what if he breaches his contract on purpose since hes, on nba standards, underpaid? That would nullify his contract and he would be out of a job, however, does this mean he can sign for a different team? or would he have a lifetime ban in the NBA?
 
DocHolliday said:
But all that stuff about him not wanting to come here, or wanting a trade immediately was coming from his agent, who now looks like a big liar.

That very well could be and I hope it is because I want him here to do his thing and make us successful but only if he wants to be here. And, let's not forget that agents are paid for numerous services including, potentially, covering for a client who's about to blunder away a big contract for both of them by saying something on the spur of the moment that effectively kills a legal transaction and has multiple ramifications...it's not like playground ball where you choose up sides and only play with whom you want to play with if and when you want to.
 
Rowdyone said:
That very well could be and I hope it is because I want him here to do his thing and make us successful but only if he wants to be here. And, let's not forget that agents are paid for numerous services including, potentially, covering for a client who's about to blunder away a big contract for both of them by saying something on the spur of the moment that effectively kills a legal transaction and has multiple ramifications...it's not like playground ball where you choose up sides and only play with whom you want to play with if and when you want to.

I think Marc Stevens wants Artest in a big market more than Artest. He makes a percentage of everything. More exposure, bigger market, more possibly endorsement deals. His a slimy, greedy SOB.
 
atxrocker said:
you gotta be kidding me.. what did Peja do to get dissed? what did he say?

He said that Peja hasn't been playing well the last couple years, isn't showing much in a contract year, etc, etc. I think today is the only day I've ever listened to Rome, but I was hoping for a trade update.
 
basically he said that peja should stop *****ing... he asked to be a leader..he was the reason for webber leaving..he is down 8 ppg down 6% fg percentage..and that he asked to be traded..and that he should have been ready for this. He also said that he shouldnt of said what he did about being "disrespected" because that just tangled things up more.
 
DocHolliday said:
I think Marc Stevens wants Artest in a big market more than Artest. He makes a percentage of everything. More exposure, bigger market, more possibly endorsement deals. His a slimy, greedy SOB.

and Artest is an angel? Im not sure who said what except for Artest putting spins on everything today but lets not fool ourselves into thinking artest never said such things... they probably BOTH are slimy,greedy sobs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top