Jim Les
G-League
I get it, you think I'm a young academic whipper-snapper with no real-world sense. So you can do me a favor and lay off the latent sarcasm.
I don't want to rehash that argument, so I'll just re-iterate my larger point by saying that the city would be equally served to build a skyscraper than an arena and fill it with multiple business (filled with workers, taxpayers, consumers, etc) rather than one business which could leave at any time. The reasoning is that a city becomes more stable as it grows (to a certain point), so there is no reason for an entertainment arena to be viewed through a different economic lens than any other large building. Yet we will likely never see tax-payer skyscrapers in Sacramento built for private businesses.
But whatever, you can disagree with that if you want, I don't care. The point is that a basketball team is about securing an identity, which can't be quantified in dollars. I don't want to see the team go, and you don't want to see the team go. We just have different opinion about how to share the burden of building an arena. But hey, why leave it at that when you can just roll your eyes and casually toss me in the group of small-minded simpletons who weren't blessed with the vision that is automatically bestowed on people who hail from the magnificent city of Minneapolis.
I don't want to rehash that argument, so I'll just re-iterate my larger point by saying that the city would be equally served to build a skyscraper than an arena and fill it with multiple business (filled with workers, taxpayers, consumers, etc) rather than one business which could leave at any time. The reasoning is that a city becomes more stable as it grows (to a certain point), so there is no reason for an entertainment arena to be viewed through a different economic lens than any other large building. Yet we will likely never see tax-payer skyscrapers in Sacramento built for private businesses.
From a purely business point of view, I think the team owner's are not entitled to charge a patron twice for a product they only receive once. If they pay for their own arena, they can do whatever they want. If they rely on city subsidies, they should lose a little bargaining power. Unfortunately, not all cities play by the same rules, so owners bolt when another city offers more and asks for less in return.As to your position, I presume you think the team's owners have an obligation to the city and the city has less obligation - in order to exist together, of course.
But whatever, you can disagree with that if you want, I don't care. The point is that a basketball team is about securing an identity, which can't be quantified in dollars. I don't want to see the team go, and you don't want to see the team go. We just have different opinion about how to share the burden of building an arena. But hey, why leave it at that when you can just roll your eyes and casually toss me in the group of small-minded simpletons who weren't blessed with the vision that is automatically bestowed on people who hail from the magnificent city of Minneapolis.
Last edited: