warriors own us
- Thread starter GoSACtown
- Start date
Let me point out the injuries in this game in particular(not even bringing up Brad and Jackson in the last game)but we didnt have Skinner, Mobely, Williamson, Brad and Jackson. Thats a hell of alot to be without, and I know it probably took a bit of wind outta the sails when Skinner couldnt go the second half, we literally have no one in there who can rebound outside of Thomas and Evans...but there's only so much they can do at their height. Peja 6-10, Songaila 6-10...thats it...everyone else is 6-7 or smaller, and going up against the Warriors who bring in 5 guys 6-10 or bigger, its going to be a long night on the boards. I think it probably would have been a different outcome had Skinner not gotten hurt.
I'm actually quite impressed with what Mullin's doing over there -- that franchsie has pissed away so much talent in the past few yers, but Mullin is now stockpiling it. Not only Murphy, Richardson, and now Davis, as a core, but Peturs and Dunleavy as well, and now Carbarkapa, White, and even Tskitishvili as guys with a ton on potential that we have actually talked about picking up for the Kigns on this board before. Veery young, almost Clipeprsesque sort of squad, but if Mullin is smart and holds it together, going to be a handul in a few years.
VF21 said:
Clipperesque? That could be scary, considering the main problem with the Clippers is Sterlings' refusal to actually spend anything more than the minimum pittance. If the Warriors actually put out some $$$ to retain their talent, they could get even more interesting.
There's nothing that makes me believe Mullin won't give Daron Bavis $272 million dollars over 5 years. And I think it was unmitigated luck that Mullin had the perfectly seasoned expiring K that New Orleans wanted in return.
actually the maloofs own us
the warriors don't own us by any stretch of the imagination. until last year's game in oakland, they had lost their last 20 to the kings. TWENTY. so they've beat us when we are REELING, no biggie. the december game had no strings attached to it, but these past 2 losses, it doesn't exaclty make me fear the warriors.
the warriors don't own us by any stretch of the imagination. until last year's game in oakland, they had lost their last 20 to the kings. TWENTY. so they've beat us when we are REELING, no biggie. the december game had no strings attached to it, but these past 2 losses, it doesn't exaclty make me fear the warriors.
seeing as they've built a good team that's beating everyone right now, they kinda did.
while im certainly not going to change my allegiances, im a norcal sports fan. the kings will always be my team, but im happy to see the warriors playing well. (besides, i get fsn-bay area and not csns or kxtv, so ill be happy to watch some games where i can root for a quality hometown team)
while im certainly not going to change my allegiances, im a norcal sports fan. the kings will always be my team, but im happy to see the warriors playing well. (besides, i get fsn-bay area and not csns or kxtv, so ill be happy to watch some games where i can root for a quality hometown team)
Evenstar said:
actually the maloofs own us
the warriors don't own us by any stretch of the imagination. until last year's game in oakland, they had lost their last 20 to the kings. TWENTY. so they've beat us when we are REELING, no biggie. the december game had no strings attached to it, but these past 2 losses, it doesn't exaclty make me fear the warriors.
the warriors don't own us by any stretch of the imagination. until last year's game in oakland, they had lost their last 20 to the kings. TWENTY. so they've beat us when we are REELING, no biggie. the december game had no strings attached to it, but these past 2 losses, it doesn't exaclty make me fear the warriors.
