Voisin: Deals have Kings' star rising again

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/story/13412499p-14253742c.html

Ailene Voisin: Deals have Kings' star rising again
By Ailene Voisin -- Bee Columnist
Published 2:15 am PDT Sunday, August 14,

Just look what else the wind blew in. All those dark questions hovering over Kings camp these past several months - so what about that revision and renewal of a formerly elite franchise? - have been whisked away with all the stealth and potency of a late-night mosquito misting.

Close the doors and windows for a few hours. Wash off the plants and the plastic lawn chairs. Stay indoors during dawn and dusk.

But by tipoff for 2005-06, it should be safe to return to Arco Arena. Turns out Geoff Petrie was ruminating, not merely resting.

Shareef Abdur-Rahim wanted to win?

Petrie wins. Once again, so will the Kings.

With the recent moves providing solid support around Mike Bibby, Peja Stojakovic and Brad Miller, the retooled roster is starting to look vaguely familiar. Starting to look like a team on the rise. At very little risk, the Kings have morphed into a more interesting and competitive club, and of utmost importance, better-positioned for that creative, critical, final stroke.

To be sure, this remains an unfinished rendering, not the masterpiece Petrie sketched back in 2002-03. There still are no 7-footers to intimidate defensively and rebound in double digits, or in the alternative, create like a point guard, score in the low post and flop like a Hall of Famer. But even the Kings' best-ever roster required revisions, among them the trade of Jason Williams for the less spectacular but eminently more valuable Bibby.

History hints it will happen again. That Petrie will strike one more time. He seldom suffers fools (J-Will) and never suffers anything for long.

Indeed, consider what has transpired since the disappointing opening-round loss to Seattle: Petrie experiences chest pains and undergoes angioplasty. Contacts the best available coach (Phil Jackson) and inquires about his interest. Acquires Bonzi Wells, one of the league's more problematic but gifted shooting guards. Signs backup point guard Jason Hart, a solid defender and role player. Signs journeyman forward/center Jamal Sampson, who is young and long and athletic, and with everything to prove, including whether a long-term NBA career is warranted. Insinuates himself into the discussions for Abdur-Rahim, then loses the former Cal star to New Jersey.

Then wins him back.

Thus, wins again.

"I think this puts us right back in the thick of things," Kings co-owner Joe Maloof said Saturday. "When we met in Las Vegas a few weeks ago, Geoff told us the two players he wanted were Bonzi Wells and Shareef Abdur-Rahim, and we got them. It is pretty amazing."

Obtaining Abdur-Rahim is a little like earning bonus points for good behavior. When the Nets reneged on their original deal for the Portland power forward, eager to trim the contract length because of sudden concerns about his knee, Petrie was right there in the background, ready to pounce. If the nine-year veteran wanted to win, wanted to taste the playoffs, wanted to join a starting lineup, where else but Sacramento?

And forget about the knee. At five years and $29.5 million, the price was right for his type of talent. A tad undersized at 6-foot-9, 230 pounds, Abdur-Rahim is a desperately needed low post presence who collects almost nine rebounds per game. His 19.8 points largely come off hook shots, curls across the lane for one-handers, dunks off the drive and mid-range jumpers in the lane.

Scouts rate his passing and defense as adequate, and he is considered a decent, not exceptional, athlete.

"Shareef is the consummate professional," Trail Blazers general manager John Nash said Saturday, "and the way Bibby, Stojakovic and Miller make perimeter shots, he should be a terrific complement. The only issue we had here was that he wanted to be our starter. With Zach Randolph, that was going to be difficult. I also understand his desire to go to a winning team. He is in the unique situation, at age 28, of never having been in the playoffs." That figures to change. Provided the Kings genuinely embrace the defensive concepts common to championship squads - this is the most pressing issue - Abdur-Rahim should enjoy many postseasons to come. Those heightened expectations just flew back in.


Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com.
 
Because it was reported we did I believe. I know it wasn't for that much, but I do believe he offered and signed a contract
 
Because you have to SIGN them to a contract regardless of how they came to the team.

Even I, the biggest AV complainer around, can't fault her in that regard. She's making a summary of the new acquisitions to prove her point. And her point, apparently, is that she's totally enamored of SAR.

My thought when reading the article was that she's apparently trying to mend some fences...albeit not too successfully. Notice how there's not ONE quote from that guy, whats-his-name again, the one who used to coach Portland? Geez, it's right on the tip of my tongue. And am I the only one reading between the lines for some sarcasm?

:rolleyes:
 
I didn't like that little snub, either. Mentioning that GP went after Jackson and doesn't even write in Adelman's name. Like, we almost ditched Rick, too bad we didn't. Then it would have been a FANTASTIC offseason.
 
You know, I really didn't even think much about the Phil Jackson thing in this article, other than I thought it was the Maloofs, not Petrie, that started all that. I think some people may just be finding what they're looking for here.
 
PixelPusher said:
Help me out, VF; was there yet another subliminal swipe at Adelman that i missed when I read through this article?

I was thinking the same thing. I would have thought, with all these new acquisitions, that a quote from the ... oh, I don't know... COACH might have been appropriate. But, considering Adelman won't talk to her, I suppose her next best course of action was to pretend we don't have a coach... at all ... anywhere. And, obviously, we don't need one because the ONLY coach mentioned in the whole piece was the passing reference to another coach:

Contacts the best available coach (Phil Jackson) and inquires about his interest.


I did notice she managed to talk to someone from the Blazers, however - yeah, that's what I (as a Kings fan) am most interested in. What's the GM from the team he's just left think about him?

:rolleyes:
 
LPKingsFan said:
You know, I really didn't even think much about the Phil Jackson thing in this article, other than I thought it was the Maloofs, not Petrie, that started all that. I think some people may just be finding what they're looking for here.

Sometimes what you DON'T see is just as telling as what you do... I have to admit, however, that it was - if even there - a pretty subtle dig. Face it, LP. With her track record, you can't eliminate the possibility of her intentionally leaving RA out.

;)
 
Circa_1985_Fan said:

No way. Shes had the hots for Peja since he hit town. Next unkind word she has to say about him is the first.

In case people have forgotten, Rick is still in town, so whipping boy/scapegoat is already in place. First player to start getting the random digs will likely be Bonzi, although Mike might go that way as well for having the audacity to try to lead.
 
Mad D said:
It'll probably be Mike. Remember her ''muscular drives'' and ''muscular rebounds'' comments for Peja:D
Oh yeah, how can we forget about that...hmmm...maybe she saw ONE muscular drive and ONE muscular rebound and was mezmerized or something, because Peja very rarely takes the ball to the rack, and we sure could use some of those MUSCULAR rebounds.*L*
 
Wow.

Now I'm not leading the Ailene Voisin bandwagon, but I think way too much subtext is being read into this article.

After all, there aren't any quotes in the article by Petrie or Shareef either. Doesn't mean there's hidden intent there.

Voisin has made some actual digs at RA in her articles, but it's a bit unfair to envision malicious intent simply from what ISN'T there.
 
We always read way too much into AV articles. It's our job; it's what we do...

;)

Seriously, with anyone else you wouldn't think twice. But, with AV, can you honestly say you didn't wonder just a little when you read that line about Petrie and Phil Jackson, ESPECIALLY when Petrie was in the hospital having heart surgery at the time and it was the MALOOFS who conducted Jackson's agent?

Hmmmmmmm?????

;) again
 
VF21 said:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/story/13412499p-14253742c.html

At very little risk, the Kings have morphed into a more interesting and competitive club, and of utmost importance, better-positioned for that creative, critical, final stroke.

She hits an interesting point about the little risk. We really got Bonzi and SAR for nothing. Although I hated to see Jackson leave, he was disgruntled and we needed a solid shooting guard badly. I sometimes forget that we got Bonzi and SAR without giving up Brad, Peja and Mike.
I don't know, if someone said "well, would you trade away Ostertag and Jackson for SAR and Bonzi" I would say "hell yeah." Sounds like a pretty good deal.
 
Ryan@CU said:
I don't know, if someone said "well, would you trade away Ostertag and Jackson for SAR and Bonzi" I would say "hell yeah." Sounds like a pretty good deal.
You lie..................You would say "hell yeah, lets pop open a bottle of Pinot Noir and celebrate." ;)
 
thesanityannex said:
You lie..................You would say "hell yeah, lets pop open a bottle of Pinot Noir and celebrate." ;)

haha, seriously. although, last night i DID break out a 2004 Ferrari Carano Fume Blanc. (trying to stay on topic) Go, Kings!
 
Back
Top