Tyreke Evans in All-Star Game? (Chris Paul Out 1-2 months + Roy Hurt?)

Status
Not open for further replies.
what about brooks from the rockets guys, he has been discussed by a few in the media


I think for no other reason than they feel they should reward the Rockets for doing amazingly well. Too bad the rules don't allow the them to select the guy who really is responsible for that phenomenon, and make Adelman the All Star game coach.
 
It's funny how brick thought that I was trying to cause an issue with my post. Some people just see what they want to see. Let's be honest with ourselves, how can you honestly say that Evans should be the replacement for Paul and Roy? He's scored well but he's th starting pg for a team that won 2 games in the month of January. Billups is the starting pg of the 2nd best team in the conference, kaman is putting up career numbers with griffin out.

Evans may have his day as an all star but how could anyone say that he deserves it over billups, kaman or Ellis? Even if it's just guards, baron davis should get more consideration than someone like Evans... He's a rookie, with the exception of Yao who was voted in to the all sar game who else made it as a rookie? Lebron and Wade couldn't do it, hell; Carmelo and Wade lead their teams to the playoffs as rookies and they didn't get in. Patience people, damn....

What makes it worse is that you are a moderator. I would think you'd be able to tell the difference.

I love how two faced you are with your arguments. You say Reke doesn't deserve to get in because his team is bad... then you point out how Kaman and Ellis and ever Baron Davis (really Baron Davis is more deserving of being an all star???) should get in over him because of their great numbers.

If you honestly think your post (and 99% of your posts) wasn't tailored to put down our 20 year old ROY candidate then you're lying to yourself. Brick's not an idiot he can tell when you are baiting as can most of us. In my oppinion you're well past being a troll on this board and I think the mods have been exceedingly lenient with you as you're really making the board a lot less fun.
 
wow, why am i not surprised? i saw it on realgm as well, roy's probably going to play....
 
i love how two faced you are with your arguments. You say reke doesn't deserve to get in because his team is bad... Then you point out how kaman and ellis and ever baron davis (really baron davis is more deserving of being an all star???) should get in over him because of their great numbers.

If you honestly think your post (and 99% of your posts) wasn't tailored to put down our 20 year old roy candidate then you're lying to yourself. Brick's not an idiot he can tell when you are baiting as can most of us. In my oppinion you're well past being a troll on this board and i think the mods have been exceedingly lenient with you as you're really making the board a lot less fun.

+++++1
 
Roy is officially not going to play in the All Star game (according to ESPN). This means that the last spot can only go to Ellis, Brooks, or Evans.
 
A hundred to one it goes to Brooks: the Rockets are easily the best team in either conference without an All-Star representative.
 
A hundred to one it goes to Brooks: the Rockets are easily the best team in either conference without an All-Star representative.

Could very well, and that would tell you everything you need to know about how important/almost determinative that winning team bias is. If we had continued on winning 45% of our games or so, that might have gotten Reke close enough to overcome it. As it is, its far more likely that Brooks, or if not Brooks then Ellis, gets the nod on the theory that Reke is already in a couple of the pre-All Star competitions, so he's got his recognition, and they want to spread it around.

Would still be hella fun if he made it, but not going to hold my breath with things turning to ick around here.
 
Brooks... maybe. But Ellis is on the Warriors and they have a worse record than the Kings.


They do, but we have fallen so far that I doubt the difference is big enough to matter anymore, and with the help of Nellieball Ellis has even bigger numbers than Reke.

This is the Commisioner's call I think, so best chance for Reke would be if Stern clearly sees him as a future superstar key to the league's popularity + marketing, and wants to help get the hype ball rolling. And that is not to say that Reke doesn't deserve it -- he does. He's flat out better than Brooks today, and in a couple of years it won't even be close (an easy way to test that is ask yourself if the Rockets could trade Brooks for Reke would they do it? And the answer is in a a millisecond). And he has been a far better leader and stable presence than Monta has. Not just a numbers guy, but a serious player playing both sides of the ball. But the league just has these traditions/biases that make it doubtful. The guy from the winning team normally gets it. The vet normally gets it. Stern can override that and say that Reke deserves it more, but I have my doubts if he would.
 
Last edited:
I r confuzzed: you seem to be saying this as if it were a bad thing?


It can be if taken too far.

The good numbers on a bad team thing is a real phenomenon, but its not universal. Sometimes you have good players just stuck on bad teams, and holding them out by tradition so you can give some sort of team award by proxy is just silly. The Rockets really don't have any All Star caliber players. Their story is actually better if that is admitted.
 
They do, but we have fallen so far that I doubt the difference is big enough to matter anymore, and with the help of Nellieball Ellis has even bigger numbers than Reke.

This is the Commisioner's call I think, so best chance for Reke would be if Stern clearly sees him as a future superstar key to the league's popularity + marketing, and wants to help get the hype ball rolling. And that is not to say that Reke doesn't deserve it -- he does. He's flat out better than Brooks today, and in a couple of years it won't even be close (an easy way to test that is ask yourself if the Rockets could trade Brooks for Reke would they do it? And the answer is in a a millisecond). And he has been a far better leader and stable presence than Monta has. Not just a numbers guy, but a serious player playing both sides of the ball. But the league just has these traditions/biases that make it doubtful. The guy from the winning team normally gets it. The vet normally gets it. Stern can override that and say that Reke deserves it more, but I have my doubts if he would.
The other side of the argument is that Stern wants the Kings to remain in Sacramento and to help create more buzz about the teams promising future, he might just pick Reke ahead of everyone to try and help with the arena issues.

You know, there is a young superstar in the making playing for the Kings, with a lot of talented youngsters on the roster. This team will be good and if you come and support the team (and subsequently increase the Kings chances of staying it Sacramento) then you will be rewarded in the long run.

It could go either way but you are right in saying that it most likely goes to Brooks or Evans, even though I would pick Evans over either of those guys every day of the week and twice on sundays.
 
Dont forget Melo is also banged up. I know he is a SF, but maybe they'll take Tyreke as he is a 'big' guard. Im sure there are a whole bunch of good 3's that could easily get in over Reke at that spot, I just thought I'd bring it up.
 
Man, the Clippers had two newly earned all stars and a former one last year and still couldn't make a run at the playoffs. And it took them this long to figure out it just might be the coach...
 
Heh, at this point they might have to rename the game the Pretty Close to Being an All Star game. And yeah, Reke is probbaly no deeper than third on the remainng depth chart, so after Kobe bails, and Melo bails, next guy after that and Reke is definitely in. :-p
 
Heh, at this point they might have to rename the game the Pretty Close to Being an All Star game. And yeah, Reke is probbaly no deeper than third on the remainng depth chart, so after Kobe bails, and Melo bails, next guy after that and Reke is definitely in. :-p

I was thinking the same thing. I'm pretty sure once Omri makes it in, we should probably just stop watching.
 
Heh, at this point they might have to rename the game the Pretty Close to Being an All Star game. And yeah, Reke is probbaly no deeper than third on the remainng depth chart, so after Kobe bails, and Melo bails, next guy after that and Reke is definitely in. :-p


True. Reke will have the advantage of already being there though. If Kobe has to bail in the final 48 hours, it might be easier for the league to simply add Reke to the WC roster when he is already there, then to try to get in Ellis as the last second.
 
Heh, at this point they might have to rename the game the Pretty Close to Being an All Star game. And yeah, Reke is probbaly no deeper than third on the remainng depth chart, so after Kobe bails, and Melo bails, next guy after that and Reke is definitely in. :-p

Sadly, I think that their massive egos won't let them skip out on the limelight. But there still remains that minor possibility
 
True. Reke will have the advantage of already being there though. If Kobe has to bail in the final 48 hours, it might be easier for the league to simply add Reke to the WC roster when he is already there, then to try to get in Ellis as the last second.

Ellis hurt his knee on Monday. Word is he will be out Wednesday, so he would likely be unavailable for the game as well. It's sounding more and more like Tyreke will be the selection if Kobe sits it out.
 
I'm guessing Kobe will make it a gametimr decision so there will be no chance of a replacement.

Sure I would love to see Tyreke in the allstar game but is it really an honor if he only makes it due to injuries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top