I agree with a lot of this.
My three biggest criticisms of the move to bring DeRozan in was…
- It likely makes our floor spacing worse for Fox & Sabonis which makes it a bit easier to slow down those guys in crunch time/the playoffs.
- It doesn’t address our size/length issues and forces us to start 3 frontcourt players with average to below average length for their position
- It doesn’t address our need to try and surround Sabonis with as many good defenders as we can and find some interior defensive help
Now perhaps #1 proves to be a non issue offensively (I’d like to see more games before coming to a conclusion here), but #2 and #3 are going to be persisting issues.
This is why I floated the long term idea of at least having DeRozan come off the bench if we don’t end up moving him down the road since that would allow us to move Murray to his ideal position (SF) and start a 3&D PF in DeRozan’s place.
Again, this is longer term thinking as I don’t know if DeRozan would be open to a bench role considering the current roster, but he does seem to be an egoless vet that wants to do what’s best for the team so I could see him in a year or 2 being open to that change. But I think it’ll be important for Murray to continue developing offensively for that to happen so we have another legit scoring option in the starting lineup.
The other thing we’ll have to figure out long term is the guard rotation. I’m really high on Carter but we obviously need to see if he will become a quality nba player. If he does, we then have 4 guards (Fox, Ellis, Monk, & Carter) who really should be logging the majority of their minutes at PG or SG (which makes minutes tight very quickly). There will also be cap reasons to sort out those 4 guards as it likely won’t be ideal to keep all of them knowing how much they’ll cost and how much we’ll want to spend elsewhere.
Personally, I love the idea of having a Fox, Ellis, and Carter guard rotation long term and moving Monk for value elsewhere (especially if the plan is to have DeRozan come off the bench since he can take over that 6th man scoring role). However, I also understand the optics of moving Fox’s best friend after he chose to not test FA and sign a reasonable 4 year deal with us. Trading him a year or 2 later wouldn’t be the best look for the franchise.
At the end of the day, I wouldn’t be surprised (long term) if the Kings looked to trade one of Ellis, Monk, or Carter + pick(s) to find that allusive PF that has above average size/length for his position, is a good/versatile defender, and can knock down the 3 ball at a good rate.
I could see a long term roster like…
PG - Fox (34) / Ellis (14)
SG - Carter (30) / Ellis (14) / DeRozan (4)
SF - Murray (24) / DeRozan (24)
PF - 3&D PF (30) / Lyles (18)
C - Sabonis (34) / Len (4)
Again, I don’t know how realistic that is since I have Monk moved in the scenario above but…
- Fox, Carter, Ellis, Murray, and 3&D PF is a hell of a lot of defense to put around Sabonis. And that defense would be spread out 1-4.
- Carter (assuming his shot transfers from college), Ellis, Murray, 3&D PF, & Lyles is good spacing for Fox & Sabonis
- Fox, Sabonis, Murray (assuming he’s continued to improve offensively), Carter (assuming his scoring transfers from college), and DeRozan is a lot of go-to scoring options
It sucks because we know we have glaring holes that will prevent us from being a top team/potential contender this season, but looking at it optimistically, I still see paths for us to build that roster we’ll ultimately need. It’ll just require tough decisions (just like how we decided to trade Jason Williams back in the day).