Bibby_10 said:Hahahaha. It could have been worse. He could have been there with Ann Coulter.
Wuster said:Several months ago, before this crazy season started, there was a thread that held everyone's predictions for the number of Kings wins and I think where they's be seeded in the playoffs. If I recall, most everyone predicted a 50+ win season (probably except piksi)I myself came in a bit lower than most of the predictions, but was still in the 50 range I think. So, now... here we are. Kings struggling to even get to .500.
HndsmCelt said:LOL, where to start with this?
1. Kings had NO chance of going past the first round from the first day of the season.
2. Even after the Ron trade Kings barely stood a chance of squeeking into the numbe 8 slot so we could tne loose to some Texas team in round one.
3. This is still one game... not the end or begining of anything
4. Skinner would not have hit the court untill the last few min just like Samson
5. EVEN IF HE HAD played it would not have mattered
6. Does making the play offs this season with this team really matter?
bigbadred00 said:Injuries and trades are going to screw up a team.
Look at Dallas, after years of doing dumb crap year after year in the off-season. Cuban finally decides to do almost nothing e/c remove Finley and sign Diop and let Booth go and bam they are contenders.
Sometimes the best option is staying relatively healthy (I know, impossible for the Kings) and letting a team grow.
Hopefully that happens next year. Hopefully there isn't a huge overhaul, and if there is, hopefully it will be done in the offseason rather than during the season. The last 2 years, huge deals have gone on, during the season, thus not helping our team gel by any means.
bigbadred00 said:Hopefully that happens next year. Hopefully there isn't a huge overhaul, and if there is, hopefully it will be done in the offseason rather than during the season. The last 2 years, huge deals have gone on, during the season, thus not helping our team gel by any means.
Bricklayer said:Actually hopefully there is a major overhaul this time now that we are no longer saddled with a delusional view of the capabilities of this bunch.
But I agree it should very much be done in the offseason if possible -- making major deals during the year is normally a sign that you've lacked vision and screwed up and are desperately scrambling to make up for it before the season goes down the drain. Very hard to make work because everything's in chaos and there is not time to get your feet set.
At least now, assuming he stays sane, we have a cornerstone in Artest. But while guys like Brad (especially with his friendship with Ron) and Mike and Cisco and Garcia are all guys who are likely kept, there ar e no guarantees, and I think aside from Ron there is not another single piece on this roster that you 100% bring back, and that includes Rick as well. This year's "vision" for the team did not work, at least partially because it was half-assed. Need to actually develop a whole new idea of what we should like and then go execute it. And if 6 guys return. Great. If its only 2. Still great. Just so long as the end result makes sense as a coherent whole and we walk into training camp knowing who we are, how we have to play to win, and what we are trying to accomplish.
BawLa said:Well put Brick.
I think that for the money you 100% keep Artest, Kevin and Cisco. But if you can use Kevin and/or Cisco to get a better piece, then by all means.
nbrans said:See, that's the thing. No one is untouchable. If Artest will bring you a better player, you trade him.
It's fine and good to say "we need continuity" and "only make trades in the offseason" but the fact is if a good trade comes along you take it no matter when it happens. Unless you find a combination of players that is really really working, which the Kings clearly haven't, you keep reworking things until they work by making the best trade and best signing possible.
I like all the decisions that have been made in recent history (except for Jason Hart, obviously). Let's just hope it keeps on going that way.
KMart23 said:how long is the contract w/ jason hart...?
pipedream...but of course I never thought Petrie could unload a few other of our 'deadweight' players before either, i.e.: Bobby Hurley, Nick Anderson.Bricklayer said:Through next year. So we might be stuck with him as the new Mateen even if we do find a better main backup.
Might always be able to move him as a small ending contract though.
hopefully before next year...in the offseason, PLEASE!BMiller52 said:I think we will be able to trade Hart and Potapenko next year, they'll be like 5 mill$ of expiring contracts.
Bricklayer said:... assuming he stays sane...
Circa_1985_Fan said:hopefully before next year...in the offseason, PLEASE!![]()
more 'moveable parts.BMiller52 said:Yeah we have a lot of flexibility this offseason. We have Bonzi to re-sign or s&t, a couple expiring contracts, a pick, some players on cheap contracts people will want(Shareef), and a 2007 pick. Maybe Monia too. Hopefully Geoff can make some nice moves this offseason.