gunks
Hall of Famer
Agreed.
But it's not like Luka, as a big wing who can create for himself or others, is the prototype of the kind of player you can build a championship team around. ....
...oh wait. ..
That was not my point. My point was that MJ was good both on defense and offense, and he did have a great supporting cast. Pippen and Kukoc were not 3 & D players, they both were creators on offense, and Pippen was one of the all-time greats on defense alone. MJ did not start winning in PO before he was surrounded by such players. The year when MJ and Pippen both retired, Kukoc was injured first half of season. Bulls were terrible, they hardly won a game. When Kukoc came back, Bulls started winning most of the games all of sudden. The point is, that team was strong even without Jordan. It never happened that a team won multiple championships with only one star. Also, it never happened that a team won multiple championships without playing good defense. You downplayed defense part when compared bad boys to MJ led Chicago, and I responded that Chicago was great on defense too.
Well, I would encourage you to watch the 30-For-30 documentary "Once Brothers" and see if you think Vlade has any Drazen baggage.
This is sortof the point though. If you get a guy who can dominate offensively to that extent -- a guy who can go on runs where he's basically carrying the entire offense -- it allows you to put other players on your roster who do nothing but rebound or knock down open three pointers with their feet set without hurting the overall team performance. There's no such thing as a perfect player who is exceptional at everything. If a player has exceptional skill in one part of the game though, you can probably cover for their weaknesses when you fill out the roster.
VF will probably delete this, but I wonder if there is any leftover animosity from what Vlade dealt with in regards to Drazen Petrovich and slovenia when it comes to Doncic. Not him personally, but just all that baggage. Because it seemed like the biggest no brainer pick in the history of picks. I for one thought Vlade knew something we didn't in regards to him being hurt, or an butthead, or something that other people didn't see.
It looks now like he was just flat out wrong.
Blob was probably the worst poster in the history of this forum. I don't like trashing people but man, he was absolutely deluded. He was on my ignore list in the end, but I'm presuming he doesn't post anymore.
I'm sure cashiers at his local Walgreens are cursing the mods here for that decision.Blob was escorted out of the building quite some time ago.
Why would I delete it? Pretty weak sauce to start your post that way.
Why do you phrase that in a way to make it sound like you think removing political discussion is a @VF21 personal vendetta, and not the official message board policy that it is?Because you tend to delete anything that has a hint of politics, and that was more than just a hint.
I'm sure cashiers at his local Walgreens are cursing the mods here for that decision.
Michael Jordan was a good defender but he wasn’t even the best defensive player on his own team.Michael Jordan was both the best offensive player and best defender in the league.
Blob was escorted out of the building quite some time ago.
yeah, it was interesting that the teams that presumably would have the most insider knowledge of Doncic—the Suns, who at the time had just hired his coach, and the Kings, with their numerous connections to the former Yugoslavia and European hoops—both passed. So I wondered the same.
Why do you phrase that in a way to make it sound like you think removing political discussion is a @VF21 personal vendetta, and not the official message board policy that it is?
But MJ was the best defender in the league when he wanted to be, much as Kawhi isn't the best defender in the league until the situation calls for it a la him casually blocking the Celtics last shot in overtime.Michael Jordan was a good defender but he wasn’t even the best defensive player on his own team.
VF will probably delete this, but I wonder if there is any leftover animosity from what Vlade dealt with in regards to Drazen Petrovich and slovenia when it comes to Doncic. Not him personally, but just all that baggage. Because it seemed like the biggest no brainer pick in the history of picks. I for one thought Vlade knew something we didn't in regards to him being hurt, or an butthead, or something that other people didn't see.
It looks now like he was just flat out wrong.
Vlade should lose his job over that draft. Didn't he say he would resign if this team failed to make the playoffs? Love you Vlade, but being a GM/Pres is just not working. We need GMs who can make better decisions than people in online forums.
Oh man, that's pretty funny. I always assumed he got carpal tunnel syndrome from writing a novel every time he wanted to argue with somebody (which was just about every thread).
I actually thought the guy was amusing, but he did have a way of making things personal, so this outcome is unsurprising.
I'd like to think he's made a realgm account, where his kind can be happy.
I agree. I just want to point out, that possible reason for drafted Bagley over Doncic was that FO considered that Bagley is a big-time talent and he will presumably be good to great to both sides of the floor and that it will be easier to build a team around him and Fox. Right now it appears that they were terribly wrong. I still have hope that Bagley will improve enough to be our half-Dream compared to Dallas half-Airness.Right but team defense is more important than individual defense. What matters is that you construct a good defensive team in the aggregate not that all 5 players on the floor are good individual defenders. Lebron is a good defender too (when he wants to be) but it's not why his teams were in the Finals 8 years in a row. It's not that I don't think defense is important -- it's more that I don't think defensive shortcomings are a reason to pass on a league MVP player like James Harden or (presumably) Luka Doncic. Conversely, you have teams like Utah which has been top 5 in defensive rating for the last 4 years without coming close to the Finals. I agree that defense is an important part of the equation if you want to put together a winning team. What I was talking about specifically in this topic is prospect evaluation. And a player can be a poor defender and still help you build a great defensive team. It sounds counter intuitive but there are defensive specialists just like there are scoring specialists. When you have a player who accounts for the scoring output of 3 starters that frees you up to plug other players into your rotation who would be offensive liabilities on a different team.
Well every other player in this era is welcome to go out and start racking up 30 point triple doubles too.You also can't just look at the numbers. Numbers are ridiculously inflated these days. It's almost a joke honestly. It's not a surprise considering fantasy stats are a big money making business however.
Last year I floated the argument that passing on Luka was less about Luka vs Bagley and more about Luka vs Fox. That received pushback.Our biggest hole for years has been the small forward spot. We finally get a guy that fits the mold and we pass on him because of what? His game or speed might not fit in with Fox? Look, i Iove D'Aaron.. he's a great kid with tons of talent... the thing is he hasn't proven anything yet. He's no star. Not yet anyway. This was a catastrophic mistake by this front office. The only way, and I mean the absolute only way I get over this is if Fox and Bagley become an unstoppable duo that elevated each other's game to all-star levels. If that doesn't happen, well then we can add this to another stupid stupid draft night decision made by this franchise that just can't seem to get the hell out of it's own way. Robinson over Lillard, Freddette over Kawhi and now Bagley over Luka.![]()
The problem is he's wrong either way. Either Luka was a bad fit next to Fox and having the best 1-2 punch with Fox as the 1 was wrong, or he honestly thought Bagley would end up the better player overall and he's wrong. Everybody gets some things wrong in the NBA, but passing on what will likely be a HOF player and top 5 in the league at his peak vs a guy who you think might be in the discussion for an all-star spot is too big of a mistake to swallow at this point.Last year I floated the argument that passing on Luka was less about Luka vs Bagley and more about Luka vs Fox. That received pushback.
Vlade chose the player who he thought would fit best next to Fox. I proposed the question that, if Luka is better and will be better than Fox, then Luka/Bagley fitting next to Fox was the wrong question to ask and the wrong assessment to make.
Simply put, Vlade chose Fox as the franchise player over Luka. That appears the real mistake in my eyes. He chose Bagley as a sidekick and #2 option rather than taking the likely superior franchise player and #1 option.
FWIW, I see Fox as a potential All Star and as someone who'd fit quite well next to Luka. Not as a criticism but an observation, I don't see #1 option assassin mentality from Fox. He looks to me like an elite #2 option. And as for Luka not being able to play well next to another ball handler, he played quite well next to Barrea last season. Fox would kill it hitting the gaps Luka creates from the attention he draws. Fox would repeatedly find himself getting the ball in 1v1 situations with little help defense.
What evidence do you have to support this claim? Scottie Pippen was the best defender on the bulls whether or not Michael wanted to be or not. This is a pretty ridiculous take.But MJ was the best defender in the league when he wanted to be, much as Kawhi isn't the best defender in the league until the situation calls for it a la him casually blocking the Celtics last shot in overtime.
The problem is he's wrong either way. Either Luka was a bad fit next to Fox and having the best 1-2 punch with Fox as the 1 was wrong, or he honestly thought Bagley would end up the better player overall and he's wrong. Everybody gets some things wrong in the NBA, but passing on what will likely be a HOF player and top 5 in the league at his peak vs a guy who you think might be in the discussion for an all-star spot is too big of a mistake to swallow at this point.
Last year I floated the argument that passing on Luka was less about Luka vs Bagley and more about Luka vs Fox. That received pushback.
Vlade chose the player who he thought would fit best next to Fox. I proposed the question that, if Luka is better and will be better than Fox, then Luka/Bagley fitting next to Fox was the wrong question to ask and the wrong assessment to make.
Simply put, Vlade chose Fox as the franchise player over Luka. That appears the real mistake in my eyes. He chose Bagley as a sidekick and #2 option rather than taking the likely superior franchise player and #1 option.
FWIW, I see Fox as a potential All Star and as someone who'd fit quite well next to Luka. Not as a criticism but an observation, I don't see #1 option assassin mentality from Fox. He looks to me like an elite #2 option. And as for Luka not being able to play well next to another ball handler, he played quite well next to Barrea last season. Fox would kill it hitting the gaps Luka creates from the attention he draws. Fox would repeatedly find himself getting the ball in 1v1 situations with little help defense.
Last year I floated the argument that passing on Luka was less about Luka vs Bagley and more about Luka vs Fox. That received pushback.
Vlade chose the player who he thought would fit best next to Fox. I proposed the question that, if Luka is better and will be better than Fox, then Luka/Bagley fitting next to Fox was the wrong question to ask and the wrong assessment to make.
Simply put, Vlade chose Fox as the franchise player over Luka. That appears the real mistake in my eyes. He chose Bagley as a sidekick and #2 option rather than taking the likely superior franchise player and #1 option.
FWIW, I see Fox as a potential All Star and as someone who'd fit quite well next to Luka. Not as a criticism but an observation, I don't see #1 option assassin mentality from Fox. He looks to me like an elite #2 option. And as for Luka not being able to play well next to another ball handler, he played quite well next to Barrea last season. Fox would kill it hitting the gaps Luka creates from the attention he draws. Fox would repeatedly find himself getting the ball in 1v1 situations with little help defense.
Last year I floated the argument that passing on Luka was less about Luka vs Bagley and more about Luka vs Fox. That received pushback.
Vlade chose the player who he thought would fit best next to Fox. I proposed the question that, if Luka is better and will be better than Fox, then Luka/Bagley fitting next to Fox was the wrong question to ask and the wrong assessment to make.
Simply put, Vlade chose Fox as the franchise player over Luka. That appears the real mistake in my eyes. He chose Bagley as a sidekick and #2 option rather than taking the likely superior franchise player and #1 option.
FWIW, I see Fox as a potential All Star and as someone who'd fit quite well next to Luka. Not as a criticism but an observation, I don't see #1 option assassin mentality from Fox. He looks to me like an elite #2 option. And as for Luka not being able to play well next to another ball handler, he played quite well next to Barrea last season. Fox would kill it hitting the gaps Luka creates from the attention he draws. Fox would repeatedly find himself getting the ball in 1v1 situations with little help defense.