I hear you, but I think there are subtle problems and unspoken factors that taint the popular assessment of Chris Webber as being largely responsible for the success of the Sacramento Kings.
I think the Kings would have ascended pretty well without Chris Webber. I believe that the success of the Kings can better be atributed to the Maloofs, Geoff Petrie, and Rick Adelman. The Maloofs rebuilt this organization based on the coaching and demeanor of Rick Adelman. The Kings management are without exception gentlemen. They allow individual players to thrive by functioning within a sophisticated system. Kings' management typically incourages players that are inspired, yet disciplined. At the same time, these men demand well-mannered professionalism. The Kings organization generally brings quality individuals to Sacramento. That appeals to the old-fashioned, middle-class, Sacramento mentality. The team reflects kings management, which in turn reflects the community. It's easy to love the Kings.
Chris Webber is charming and good looking. Nevertheless, throughout his stay in Sacramento he always danced along the fringe of acceptable behavior. He was great at times, but missed a lot of games. He never really fired on all twelve cylinders. Vlade Divac was the glue that held things together during the ascendency of the Kings. Peja Stojakovic, Kenny Thomas, Lawrence Funderburke, Mike Bibby, Jon Barry, Brad Miller, Jimmy Jackson, Doug Christie. Corliss Williamson, Brian Skinner, Matt Barnes, and a lot of other good guys played a part in the success of the Kings. Players have come and gone. The irrefutable truth is that Kings management is responsible for the quality and character of men that have been brought to Sacramento. The Kings have a positive "identity" in the League, and certainly here in Sacramento.
If one attempts to assess personal impacts on the success of the Sacramento Kings, perhaps Rick Adelman and Geoff Petrie should have their modest sports jackets and turtle-neck sweaters hung from the rafters of ARCO Arena.