No where in my post did I say he is not good enough. I even said I would do the trade because of his value. However we need a SF to spread the floor, and Wallace is not a good 3 point shooter. We need a SF who will be able to age with our youngsters and still be able to produce when our guys hit their prime. when Evans is 27 and Cousins is 26 Wallace will be 34. How effective will a guy who relies on athleticism be at age 34?
You're probably looking short term which is fine. Wallace is definitely better than any small forward we have on our roster, but he is not an ideal fit for our team. What do we need out of that position? Defense, size, athleticism, and 3 point shooting. We need a SF who has that total package. It will help with the flow of our team. And by having a relatively young SF, he can be the long term solution to our problems. The more years our players can play together the better the chemistry and the quality of play will be.