For VF, this underscores my issue with Grant. To think we can't get someone better, even who has a history with the area/team, is underestimating the community. We could grab a young broadcast major from CSUS and they'd be as good as Grant, without the history of douchebaggery. We're better than that.
I respect your opinion as do I most of the others in this debate. In all honesty, I really cannot get too excited about Grant Napear one way or the other. I don't listen to his radio show because the only station I get over the air up here is KFBK. I don't want to waste my bandwidth listening on the computer, so unless there's something important going on, I don't care.
And you know what? The NBA approved the sale today and, at least to this Kings fan, there's nothing more important than that.
If Grant stays as the PBP announcer, I'll still watch the games. If he leaves, I'll still watch the games. It's about the players on the court, not the guy talking into the microphone. Heck, I did PBP for years by watching my TV and typing it into my computer to enter here at KF for all the folks who couldn't get game info any other way. It's not exactly rocket surgery.
I'm in too good a mood to sweat the small stuff. And right now, after all we've been through, it's pretty much all small stuff.
![]()
I have one request: BRING BACK KAYTE CHRISTENSEN!
I'm really tired of the "Grant sold out the fans' rhetoric. I like Grant and Jerry and hope they continue. I love Gary Gerould and cannot imagine him not being the voice of the Kings. I'm certain the over broadcast production will have a complete overhaul. Having money to spend and a decent product to promote will make all the difference in the world.
There is no way Grant will be "dropped" from radio. There is a reason he has been in the same time slot in Sacramento for the past 18 years. The dude gets ratings. If he didn't, he would have been gone a long time ago.
Some one said that once the team improves, the TV presentation improves. True, but there is such thing as on air talent, graphics, non-basketball content improvement for the fringe fan in spite of the product on the floor. Things such as commercials, lead ins and lead outs, side line reporting, pre/post/halftime productions, interviews, integration of social media, etc.
As far as 1140, I feel that them affiliating with CBS Sports is a huge improvement. I believe once Don Geronimo is gone, then 1140 can get back to quality 24 hour sports programming and more time to dedicate to the Kings. I am not a huge fan of Gary Gerold, although I feel that he should go out on his own terms. I don't think there is much you can do to improve a radio broadcast other than widen the range of the station. I will never, ever ever understand why you can't get 1140 past Modesto, but you can get KNBR in Las Vegas on a good night. Confusing.
At the very least, Napear should be dropped from radio. Not sure his abrasive NY style works in Sac in my opinion. As far ad Grant leaking that he had disagreements with the Maloofs and therefore supported Sacramento is a stretch. Grant is looking out for himself and trying to make sure he has a job. When he thought the team was going to Anaheim, he wrote us off and did it willingly . When he realized the team would stay in Sac this time around, all if a sudden he was always about Sac and it's grassroots movement. Not buying it. We conveniently forget that Grant repeatedly to Carmichael Dave that what the fans thought didn't matter and he is wasting his time. Grant is just jumping on the winning side. I can't respect that and it will always be in the back of my mind when I see or hear him.
As far as Kozimor, he didn't turn on Sacramento . He was telling Carmichael Dave not to trust Grant or KHTK. That's what Marcos Breton was telling Dave too.
I don't understand why people listen to Grant's radio show if it is so awful. As long as people listen, his shows will have sponsors and it will continue to be on the air.
"I think Grant's show is awful and I listen every day so I should know." This seems to be the theme. Makes no sense. Why the self torture?
I don't understand why people listen to Grant's radio show if it is so awful. As long as people listen, his shows will have sponsors and it will continue to be on the air.
"I think Grant's show is awful and I listen every day so I should know." This seems to be the theme. Makes no sense. Why the self torture?
I disagree. I really like the fact that Gary, Grant and Jerry ALL have been with the team for 25+ years. They have seen all the highs and lows, and can give personal stories about the early days of the team, memories about Arco I, etc. I know they will retire eventually, but I would love to keep them as long as possible. I am not excited about bringing a younger voice who has no idea what the playoff days of the early 2000's were like, and has no clue why we hate Robert Horry so much...
I respect your opinion as do I most of the others in this debate. In all honesty, I really cannot get too excited about Grant Napear one way or the other. I don't listen to his radio show because the only station I get over the air up here is KFBK. I don't want to waste my bandwidth listening on the computer, so unless there's something important going on, I don't care.
And you know what? The NBA approved the sale today and, at least to this Kings fan, there's nothing more important than that.
If Grant stays as the PBP announcer, I'll still watch the games. If he leaves, I'll still watch the games. It's about the players on the court, not the guy talking into the microphone. Heck, I did PBP for years by watching my TV and typing it into my computer to enter here at KF for all the folks who couldn't get game info any other way. It's not exactly rocket surgery.
I'm in too good a mood to sweat the small stuff. And right now, after all we've been through, it's pretty much all small stuff.
![]()
Because it is the ONLY station to get any Kings news while in the car, etc. He does interviews with coaches, owners, players, etc. When someone has a monopoly on something, that is where you have to go to get your info.
Seeing that we now have an Indian owner, I think there is a really good possibility that we might end up seeing some Indian announcers (radio and/or tv) in the near future. I would imagine Ranadive will try to get some major Kings coverage all the way out to India and other countries with a high population of Indian folks...
Seeing that we now have an Indian owner, I think there is a really good possibility that we might end up seeing some Indian announcers (radio and/or tv) in the near future. I would imagine Ranadive will try to get some major Kings coverage all the way out to India and other countries with a high population of Indian folks...
??????
I don't follow the logic. When Houston brought Yao Ming into the mix and increased their audience by about a bazillion, they didn't bring in a Chinese announcer.
??????
I don't follow the logic. When Houston brought Yao Ming into the mix and increased their audience by about a bazillion, they didn't bring in a Chinese announcer.
People just need to get a grip. It's not like you're bringing Grant Napear into your house and asking him to marry your daughter.
He's a sports radio talk show host, not your trusted pastor or teacher or doctor or anything else that really truly matters. You can tune in for the news you want to hear and then ...guess what? There's a little knob you can use to stop listening.
The idea proposed by swisshh that Grant Napear somehow had the power to brainwash a lot of Kings fans is an insult to all Kings fans. As for the comment that "the fans must hold the media accountable," there's one problem with that. GRANT NAPEAR ISN'T THE MEDIA. He's a sports radio talk show host.
If you want to grab torches and pitchforks over somebody, why not target Jason Jones, the Kings BEAT REPORTER for the Sacramento Bee? He's an embarrassment and knows less about the Kings, Sacramento fans and sports in general than anybody not named Ric Bucher.
You keep defending Grant, which is fine as everyone is entitled to their opinion, but what I don't get is that if a poster here acts the way Grant does towards many callers and has over many years, you'd ban him within a few days. I can't go around here calling other posters morons, telling them to jump off buildings and dunk their head in the toilet because they don't know what the hell they're talking about. I can't flat out call another poster a freakin moron, which I've heard Grant say numerous times and all of these are examples of what he says to callers, Kings fans, Sacramento residents.People just need to get a grip. It's not like you're bringing Grant Napear into your house and asking him to marry your daughter.
You keep defending Grant, which is fine as everyone is entitled to their opinion, but what I don't get is that if a poster here acts the way Grant does towards many callers and has over many years, you'd ban him within a few days. I can't go around here calling other posters morons, telling them to jump off buildings and dunk their head in the toilet because they don't know what the hell they're talking about. I can't flat out call another poster a freakin moron, which I've heard Grant say numerous times and all of these are examples of what he says to callers, Kings fans, Sacramento residents.
So I'm generally curious, why are you defending Grant so much when you quickly silence any posters here who act the same way? Seems hypocritical to me to downplay the way Grant treats Kings fans while being up in arms if someone here were to do the same. You generally preach civility more than any MOD here, so I find it quite odd you're a staunch defender of arguably the least civil sports radio host I've ever heard.
I listen to Grant all the time, and he always held that the Kings would never leave Sacramento. Not once did he concede that they would move anywhere, including Ahaheim, Las Vegas, or Seattle. There are plenty of times I have had problems with things Grant has said or done, but he has always said that he thought this team would end up staying in Sacramento.
People just need to get a grip. It's not like you're bringing Grant Napear into your house and asking him to marry your daughter.
He's a sports radio talk show host, not your trusted pastor or teacher or doctor or anything else that really truly matters. You can tune in for the news you want to hear and then ...guess what? There's a little knob you can use to stop listening.
The idea proposed by swisshh that Grant Napear somehow had the power to brainwash a lot of Kings fans is an insult to all Kings fans. As for the comment that "the fans must hold the media accountable," there's one problem with that. GRANT NAPEAR ISN'T THE MEDIA. He's a sports radio talk show host.
If you want to grab torches and pitchforks over somebody, why not target Jason Jones, the Kings BEAT REPORTER for the Sacramento Bee? He's an embarrassment and knows less about the Kings, Sacramento fans and sports in general than anybody not named Ric Bucher.
You keep defending Grant, which is fine as everyone is entitled to their opinion, but what I don't get is that if a poster here acts the way Grant does towards many callers and has over many years, you'd ban him within a few days.
The Kings aren't strong enough to carry a sports station on their own and there isn't much outside of the bay area in NorCal to garner interest. College sports doesn't have a large enough draw around here to supplement a Kings station.
I do hope there is a shake-up in the broadcasting persona and format. I don't like Grant and I feel he must lose his job for selling out the fans. I also feel that he just doesn't have much of an entertaining personality. The 'brash NY attitude' is not a problem for me. The problem is that his callers are just really low IQ, low sports IQ, and he cherry picks the lowest of the low and most obvious of the obvious to rant on. He can't fill a slow sports day to save his life. He can't involve the outside world or just toss a smidge of pop culture in to liven things up. He's from a prototype of the pure sports media guy, but his play by play and commentary are not strong enough to hold him up. I don't recall the G-man making many jokes or references, but his play by play is so good that I don't care. Grant is a robot in comparison. His play by play is nothing but catch phrases and nearly automated responses. He has no dynamic element to his play by play and he doesn't mesh well with many other personalities. That's why we're stuck with Jerry Reynolds.
So I think we're stuck with bay area cable for now, but I hope the presentation is a lot better and far more dynamic in the future. Also, bring back Kayte.
You keep defending Grant, which is fine as everyone is entitled to their opinion, but what I don't get is that if a poster here acts the way Grant does towards many callers and has over many years, you'd ban him within a few days. I can't go around here calling other posters morons, telling them to jump off buildings and dunk their head in the toilet because they don't know what the hell they're talking about. I can't flat out call another poster a freakin moron, which I've heard Grant say numerous times and all of these are examples of what he says to callers, Kings fans, Sacramento residents.
So I'm generally curious, why are you defending Grant so much when you quickly silence any posters here who act the same way? Seems hypocritical to me to downplay the way Grant treats Kings fans while being up in arms if someone here were to do the same. You generally preach civility more than any MOD here, so I find it quite odd you're a staunch defender of arguably the least civil sports radio host I've ever heard.
??????
I don't follow the logic. When Houston brought Yao Ming into the mix and increased their audience by about a bazillion, they didn't bring in a Chinese announcer.