A humongous swing for the fences. Could be borderline insane. So, how about we try this trade...
Kings Incoming:
Allen, Rondo, (future 1st?)
Boston Incoming:
Martin, Udrih, Nocioni, 23rd (or 4th)
Why Kings do this:
Get that solid PG we always needed, and a hard nosed one at that. Plus, both are 2010 expiring, thus shedding our three longest contracts (not including Garcia). Also, rids of three older players while shoring up our young guy movement (Rondo is only 23). Also, Greene moves up into a more prominent role, and essentially shores us up for the 2010 sweepstakes again. (One thing too, we would make up for the Douby mistake.)
Why the Kings don't:
Obviously, losing Kevin Martin would kill off any fan base that was left. No matter how much we like or dislike him, he is our franchise player. If we trade him, one is expected in return. As good as Rondo has been, he isn't a franchise player. Also, does not guarantee any FAs would come here in 2010, and all this can be a moot point. Plus, we'd be sacrificing a lot for a little. This is a complete rebuild.
Why the Celtics do this:
Supposedly the Celtics are searching for a younger replacement for Ray Allen. What better replacement then a young stud like Kevin Martin. Also, there's been rumors that Rondo has been making players around him unhappy with his moodiness. Ridding themselves of these two supposed cancers while filling the hole of a SG would help them. Plus, there was also supposed interest in Nocioni, adding him would definitely shore up their bench. Also puts them back into this draft in the 1st round (with a chance of a top 4 player perhaps)
Why the Celtics don't do this:
It's a lot of talent to sacrifice in order to get a little younger in the SG department. Also, they're taking all of Sacramento's bad contracts in the process. If it wasn't win now before, it'll be win now mode for them this upcoming season.
Projected lineup:
Kings:
PG - Rondo
SG - Allen
SF - Garcia
PF - Thompson
C - Hawes
Celtics:
PG - Udrih
SG - Martin
SF - Pierce
PF - Garnett
C - Perkins
I know this trade is borderline ridiculous, and it's definitely swing for the fences, but I wouldn't mind sacrificing Martin to rid ourselves of Beno and Noc. I know this is all based off of one very small rumor, so this could mean absolutely nothing, but I'd thought I would help find our way into this equation. Boston owes us! Plus 2010 season (barring any stupid signings), we would have Hawes, Garcia, Thompson, (and Greene) on our salary. That's not a bad core to work around. That totals to be about $11 million in salary, essentially giving us the chance to sign two home run FA's (assuming they'd be willing to come). I know many of you will have a field day with this one, (especially about sacrificing our top pick and Boston eating all of our bad contracts), but I like the idea of tons of salary, plus a young front court to work with. Also, I think Boston might be sacrificing their strong starters, but they get younger and shore up their bench.
Kings Incoming:
Allen, Rondo, (future 1st?)
Boston Incoming:
Martin, Udrih, Nocioni, 23rd (or 4th)
Why Kings do this:
Get that solid PG we always needed, and a hard nosed one at that. Plus, both are 2010 expiring, thus shedding our three longest contracts (not including Garcia). Also, rids of three older players while shoring up our young guy movement (Rondo is only 23). Also, Greene moves up into a more prominent role, and essentially shores us up for the 2010 sweepstakes again. (One thing too, we would make up for the Douby mistake.)
Why the Kings don't:
Obviously, losing Kevin Martin would kill off any fan base that was left. No matter how much we like or dislike him, he is our franchise player. If we trade him, one is expected in return. As good as Rondo has been, he isn't a franchise player. Also, does not guarantee any FAs would come here in 2010, and all this can be a moot point. Plus, we'd be sacrificing a lot for a little. This is a complete rebuild.
Why the Celtics do this:
Supposedly the Celtics are searching for a younger replacement for Ray Allen. What better replacement then a young stud like Kevin Martin. Also, there's been rumors that Rondo has been making players around him unhappy with his moodiness. Ridding themselves of these two supposed cancers while filling the hole of a SG would help them. Plus, there was also supposed interest in Nocioni, adding him would definitely shore up their bench. Also puts them back into this draft in the 1st round (with a chance of a top 4 player perhaps)
Why the Celtics don't do this:
It's a lot of talent to sacrifice in order to get a little younger in the SG department. Also, they're taking all of Sacramento's bad contracts in the process. If it wasn't win now before, it'll be win now mode for them this upcoming season.
Projected lineup:
Kings:
PG - Rondo
SG - Allen
SF - Garcia
PF - Thompson
C - Hawes
Celtics:
PG - Udrih
SG - Martin
SF - Pierce
PF - Garnett
C - Perkins
I know this trade is borderline ridiculous, and it's definitely swing for the fences, but I wouldn't mind sacrificing Martin to rid ourselves of Beno and Noc. I know this is all based off of one very small rumor, so this could mean absolutely nothing, but I'd thought I would help find our way into this equation. Boston owes us! Plus 2010 season (barring any stupid signings), we would have Hawes, Garcia, Thompson, (and Greene) on our salary. That's not a bad core to work around. That totals to be about $11 million in salary, essentially giving us the chance to sign two home run FA's (assuming they'd be willing to come). I know many of you will have a field day with this one, (especially about sacrificing our top pick and Boston eating all of our bad contracts), but I like the idea of tons of salary, plus a young front court to work with. Also, I think Boston might be sacrificing their strong starters, but they get younger and shore up their bench.