Rick's good at succeeding...

[Bricklayer]

Sorry folks but this team won lost night in spite of Adelman. Why Miller played basically the entire 4th and Shareef sat while Duncan brought them back is beyond me.

Its amazing that in your book Rick has never once won a game, and in fact the Kings routinely make the playoffs every year in spite of him.

Reef 12min 2pts (1-4FG) 2reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 2TO 4Fl

Reason enough for you? Probably not. But it should be. Brad was the comapratively hot hand with his dazziling 10pt 6rebs 4ast 1stl 1blk.

 

[AriesMar27]

Of course. Nothing is a sure thing. But the odds are better with that. It's just like the odds are better of you winning a series if you have home court. Or winning the first two games of a series. The odds are better, but it doesn't guarantee anything.

yeah but didnt the spurs win games 1 and 2 against the lakers in 2004 then get swept the next 4 after winning the title in 2003? what are the odds?

 

[Bricklayer]

yeah but didnt the spurs win games 1 and 2 against the lakers in 2004 then get swept the next 4 after winning the title in 2003? what are the odds?

Odds = much better when you have 4 HOFs on the team.

 

[grego]

yeah but didnt the spurs win games 1 and 2 against the lakers in 2004 then get swept the next 4 after winning the title in 2003? what are the odds?

To add to what brick said, Lakers for all their problems still had a pretty good cast. Parker is better than previous, and Spurs have shooters now. Not Hedo(who disappeared) and Horry(who had his mental lapse). Of course anything is possible, but odds favor Spurs not having that again. And most of all, Kings don't have a Shaq or Kobe, which is good for Spurs fans.