Railyard deal looks near

#1
Not sure if this deserves its own thread, but thought it was interesting.

City, developer must first agree on plan to move tracks

By Mary Lynne Vellinga - Bee Staff Writer

Last Updated 12:20 am PST Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Story appeared in METRO section, Page B1


Sacramento city officials are finalizing a key agreement with the downtown railyard developer that would allow building to finally move forward on the shuttered industrial site -- one of the nation's largest.

"This is further along than we've ever gotten, and we're gaining steam," said Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo.

Despite Sacramento voters' resounding rejection earlier this month of a sales tax increase to build a new Kings arena in the railyard, city leaders say they still expect Georgia developer Stan Thomas to break ground by next year for an ambitious project that would include 10,000 housing units, offices and shops.

Before that can happen, however, the city and Thomas must reach agreement on a plan to move the existing freight and passenger tracks about 300 feet to the north -- something Fargo said would cost about $40 million.

Moving the tracks would open up land for development and make it possible for Thomas to elevate Fifth and Sixth streets over the tracks on footings paid for by the city as part of the deal.

In addition, the city needs to make a deal with Thomas to buy the land needed for a planned train, bus and light-rail complex. Thomas' local development team has described the station as a key anchor for the planned development, and it's long been one of the city's top priorities as well.

City staff members are finalizing the agreements on the land purchase and track relocation, and had planned to present them to the City Council at today's session. That presentation has been postponed until Dec. 5.

"We're making great progress here; it's just a complex transaction and we probably have a dozen people working on it," Assistant City Manager John Dangberg said Monday.

City Council members are scheduled to receive a closed session briefing today on the status of the negotiations.

Agenda documents produced for today's meeting identified two sources of funding that the city intends to tap in order to move the tracks and buy the land for the station. Part of the money -- $15.9 million -- would come from the city's yearly allocation from Measure A, the county's transportation sales tax. An additional $11.6 million would be borrowed from various city transportation funds and paid back through next year's Measure A allocation.

Fargo said the city has various additional federal and local sources of funds, including $2.5 million earmarked earlier this year from a $75 million city bond.

"We're not concerned about being able to (raise) the money to do this," Fargo said. "It's a high priority for us, for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments and for the federal government."

City leaders contacted Monday sounded more optimistic than they have in the past that something would happen in the railyard soon. Three years after his investment group agreed to buy the railyard from Union Pacific, Thomas has told council members he plans to close on the 240-acre property by the end of the year.

"My fingers are crossed and double-crossed that this will happen," said City Councilman Ray Tretheway. "For the city to have the property around the (train) depot and for the UP yard to come into private hands -- it would be a spectacular day in Sacramento.
"We've heard deadlines after deadlines after deadlines," Tretheway continued. "This clearly seems the most promising. It's very serious."

Even after the city acquires land for the new transportation complex, it would likely be years before it actually got built. The city intends to go after federal and state bond funds, including a piece of the $20 billion statewide transportation bond passed by voters Nov. 7. Still, it could take years to piece together the $300 million or so needed.

"It could be five or seven years out," said Assistant City Manager Marty Hanneman. "You've got to come up with $300 million, and that's going to be a big challenge."

Still, just moving the tracks and concurrently completing the first steps of the planned transportation center -- improving parking, bringing in light rail and more buses -- would provide a significant boost to the railyard rebirth, said Suheil Totah, vice president for railyard developer Thomas Enterprises.

"People expect the entire railyard to be developed at once, and it's not going to be," he said. "It's going to be developed over 15, 20 years. To get these individual pieces is how this project will develop. To get this first piece is a huge step forward."
 
#2
Quote from Harvey Benjamin radio interview:
... it's just a little thing. $500 million in infrastructure. I should say he described it as two batches and the first one was $300 million for the first phase of the development.

And Harvey Benjamin from the NBA was called a liar by the Bee for the above statement.
So when you see the quote from the above article "300 million or so". You might have some idea of how much is "so".
 
#3
Where are the anti-arena supporters now!! It's just funny how the Bee has glossed over the details in how much the city is/will be kicking in for this development. There are enough roads with potholes and are just plain ****ty in this state and I doubt they are going to give the city the money to move railroad tracks and develop the infrastructure to build a bunch of stores.

$300 million??? Where's the lady with her kids wondering who is going to by them milk now???
 
#4
Actually, I think it was the city that glossed this over, especially in the negotiations with the MSE. That is why Benjamen and Stern were shocked when they found out later that the city didn't really have a clue where it was going to get $300 million for the Phase one infrastructure. Benjamin said they were lead to believe that the city already had these funds identified and earmarked.

And this is why everything fell apart at that point and why Joe said they want to be in Sacramento, but it might have to be other than downtown, because there were so many difficult hurdles to the downtown site. Gee, he was being totally forthright and honest.
 
#9
Now we know why Fargo was so quiet during this. She didnt want any part of the backlash that would come with knowing theres no money for anything.

Saving her own arse.... or atleast trying to.....
 
#12
When it comes to the election for mayor, you may not get much of a choice. Steve Cohn and Rob Fong are the only two I've heard. Mayor in Sacramento isn't as powerful a position as some other big cities. Joe Serna showed lots of vision in the job and still found it difficult to get things done.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#13
Could you all consider just electing Joe Serna again and hoping perhaps his spirit is still strong enough in City Hall to do the job?

The true vision and leadership of Joe Serna is only now becoming apparent. He was very, very good for the city of Sacramento and I can only hope someone with even half his dedication and community spirit comes along in the near future.
 
#15
Could you all consider just electing Joe Serna again and hoping perhaps his spirit is still strong enough in City Hall to do the job?

The true vision and leadership of Joe Serna is only now becoming apparent. He was very, very good for the city of Sacramento and I can only hope someone with even half his dedication and community spirit comes along in the near future.
Couldn't have said that any better, VF. That almost brought a tear to my eyes, remembering Mr. Serna and the love he had for our city...HIS city. :)
 
#16
This complex is never going to get built...mark my words.

The city has no clue what they are doing and how will they be able to justify the 300 million or so they would have to spend??