randymoss1881
Starter
You said if we were 16-9 you'd still fire malone. Would you fire him if we were 25-0?
You made the statement that anyone can run. In the weeks since the coaching change, we've seen the team play poorly due to the pace change and we've seen the team's best player struggle to play a running style. Many fans saw this same style in the many years before your arrival. We are familiar with this style and how it has lost many games.
In response to the firing of Malone, Vivek said, and I paraphrase here, that Malone changed the culture and solidified the locker room, but now it was time for the next step. Since the coaching change, team emotion and chemistry has fallen off. It seems the coach was far more important to the locker room than management realized. There has also been no next step and if there isn't a new coach installed this season, then fans know the season is being shelved in a manner of way. We know that playoffs are no longer the goal.
However, I don't think you will change course. In many fans view, Kings ownership and management has put brand identity over customer satisfaction and quality of product. How far is the Kings organization willing to stick with that approach before the loss of games and fans becomes too much?
In many fans view, Kings ownership and management has put brand identity [running style offense] over customer satisfaction and quality of product. How far is the Kings organization willing to stick with that approach before the loss of games and fans becomes too much?
This is your question. Everything before that is commentary and its just not practical to expect CD to read it all verbatim. It's not an inquisition. If you want honest answers, don't hit your guest over the head with editorial first. The question itself is a good one though. And I would recommend it on its own.
There seems to be a lack of communication between the FO and players in the last few weeks. How are you and the front offense responding to the frustration in the locker room right now?
This is your question. Everything before that is commentary and its just not practical to expect CD to read it all verbatim. It's not an inquisition. If you want honest answers, don't hit your guest over the head with editorial first. The question itself is a good one though. And I would recommend it on its own.
Last one...
If you'd visited Kingfans.com early in the season you would have seen an unprecedented level of optimism about the job this front office was doing buoyed by the remarkable progress we were seeing on the court. When Malone was fired, much of that optimism left with him and the prospect of yet another prolonged interim coaching situation took the rest of it. Whatever it is you're cooking up in that secret laboratory of yours, please hurry. It's like the Walking Dead in here. We might not survive the night.
Technically, that's not a question.![]()
Why would we not want a coach like George Karl?
Winner winner chicken dinner!You said that even if Coach Malone went 16-9, he would've been fired because his coaching style didn't fit your guys' vision of Kings basketball. Why is style being put on such a high pedestal as opposed to winning ball games? What specific factors are guiding this decision?
I love this question. If he answers it, it shows humility and growth.What would you consider to be top 3 mistakes you as a GM made since joining the Kings?
What impression do you think the rest of the league has about our front office after firing a successful young coach in Malone, pursuing things like a junkball style of play in Reno, and openly considering non-starter ideas like the 4 on 5 "cherry-picking" plays?