This isn't a team in the process of allowing one player to discover something at the cost of others. Clearly. The fact remains if they want him to be exclusively a PF then they aren't paying attention to the current trends of modern basketball. If anything putting him in that position would only stymie development. Playing at PF isn't the issue, it's the teams inability to spread as a result. You have Fox, Bagley, and Holmes out there. WTF is that? That's not development, that's just setting the plate of a nice belly full of failure.
In my post, the point was that if it fails, you get a good draft pick. If it succeeds. It was good for development. I couldn't care less about getting Bjelica time at the 4 so we can space the floor. Same with putting Barnes in his optimal position of PF. These guys aren't part of the core. The bigger issue is having a PG who can't shoot and requires an offense built around what's best for his scoring. I like Fox, but he's not a number 1. He does not have one exceptional offensive talent except speed. If the Kings have to build around his offensive shortcomings, they're already going to fail.
It's understandable being tired of waiting for the Kings to make the playoffs, but without Bagley developing, we're back to being a team with the assets that might push for an 8th seed in the future and no further. That plan hasn't worked for the past 15 years.
To be clear, I'm not knocking Fox. He has limitations like any player. He will need another guy on the team who can consistently get his own shot. Whether we like Bagley's post ups or not, he is the only other player who can consistently score or get to the line on his own. That shouldn't be lost on anyone here. Playmaking is fine, but when push comes to shove in the NBA, the guy who can get shots on his own is the star.