I have to believe that when Monte came in they had a gentleman's agreement that he could pick a coach in year 2 if needed. Certainly Gentry was brought in to fill the interim role if it came to that, but I doubt he is the long term option.With Vivek, the GM only gets one chance to make a coaching change, if the GM even gets to hire his own coach at all. Monte needs to keep his powder dry until the person he really wants is available. If Monte makes a mid-season move he’ll end up with Gentry as the interim and could very easily be put in a situation where he is forced to extend Gentry. It’s very possible that is not his desired outcome. I would certainly caution against any mid-season change if Monte is not 100% certain he would be OK with Gentry in the long-term.
But I said if he has the offensive game that forces the other team to adjust we'd do that. Right now he's a project still and so that puts us at the disadvantage when working him the lineup. Losing last year was backbreaking for his timeline.This is the same argument we've heard. He HAS played center and who really ate him up even without the body he has now? And the scale slides both ways. They have to guard him on the other end. Look, Bam just started his way to a finals appearance and he far from ate up Marvin. Bagley's an offense talent first and foremost, he wasn't drafted to be the next Bill Russell and right now in these lineups he isn't getting any space to perform. That's the issue they need to be concerned about right now.
With Vivek, the GM only gets one chance to make a coaching change, if the GM even gets to hire his own coach at all. Monte needs to keep his powder dry until the person he really wants is available. If Monte makes a mid-season move he’ll end up with Gentry as the interim and could very easily be put in a situation where he is forced to extend Gentry. It’s very possible that is not his desired outcome. I would certainly caution against any mid-season change if Monte is not 100% certain he would be OK with Gentry in the long-term.
Exactly—look at the roster composition; Bagley is not playing center, hanging out in the dunker spot. Monte does not value the center position at $11M next season, let alone Bagley’s 5th option at $14M. Bagley will play power forward this year. If he shows superstar promise there, then he is worth a big extension (although I think he ends up waiting until after next year). If he fizzles out at PF, then he gets traded. Bagley may be a center, but it won’t be on the Kings.So yeah having him try to defend inside and getting eaten up by teams that can play large is better than letting him chase on the perimeter where at least if he is healthy he has his athletic skills to compensate? It's not like we don't have a handful of beefy guys who are harder to push around that can be "the center".
When playing three guards if we've got Barnes at the 4 then yeah, hopefully Bags can defend at the 5 spot, but if we're doing that, we're hopefully playing offense at the level that forces the other team to adjust to our lineup.
Woodard played good defense on the interior at PF. He challenged a ton on the inside on help and he altered shots. Honestly, I'm not sure what they expect out of Woodard but I'm not sure how much the G-league would help him. He doesn't need to develop physically. His ball handling is a little iffy but again, not really something that will probably improve in the G-league. I see him as a 3/4 combo role player at his ceiling anyway. Ramsey can get a lot out of the G-league however since ideally he's a combo guard so running offense will help him.
But I said if he has the offensive game that forces the other team to adjust we'd do that. Right now he's a project still and so that puts us at the disadvantage when working him the lineup. Losing last year was backbreaking for his timeline.
I may have just missed it because the announcers couldn't get the numbers straight and Luke was running all the deep bench guys at once so I wasn't even sure who I was watching some of the time. I like Woodard at the 4, it's probably his best position, but our roster is so stacked at the 4 and 5 this year that I think he's going to have to earn his minutes at the 3 instead and to do that he'll have to prove he can knock down shots. We'll see though. If he comes in and plays his way into a rotation spot right away we might actually be a team on the rise this year cause reliable three and D minutes off the bench have been tough to come by in recent years.
Exactly—look at the roster composition; Bagley is not playing center, hanging out in the dunker spot. Monte does not value the center position at $11M next season, let alone Bagley’s 5th option at $14M. Bagley will play power forward this year. If he shows superstar promise there, then he is worth a big extension (although I think he ends up waiting until after next year). If he fizzles out at PF, then he gets traded. Bagley may be a center, but it won’t be on the Kings.
BTW, the bigger issue with him at center is having to captain the defense and make the calls. That’s too much.
At least Fox hit the rim on that one. He'll figure it out. I love our guard rotation tonight. Fox, Hield, Haliburton and Guy. No need to mess around with anyone else out there.
Fox with 12 assists but 3-17. (0-7 on 3s).... preseason.
Hes just getting his misses outta the way.Fox shooting in preseason:
FG: 17-51 (33%)
2P: 13-24 (54%)
3P: 4-27 (<15%)
FT: 10-16 (62.5%)
Well Bagley is the only one of those who has some skill in the paint. Watching Whiteside and Homz do their best Garnett rendition is painful.If i'm looking for actual constructive criticism, I'd say that Fox and our rollers (Bagley/Holmes/Whiteside) need to be looking to dish the ball out to the wings for open 3s more once the defense collapses on the roller/driver. We had a lot of nice set ups near the rim that led to 3 guys collapsing on the inside but too often we forced the shot inside rather than kicking it out for an open 3.
Hes just getting his misses outta the way.
One can hope!
Also, remember when Buddy signed his huge extension and then immediately went into the worst shooting slump of his career for 3 months? These things may not be unrelated.
Contrary to all those loud posts about wanting Hinkie to bring the process to the Kings over the offseason, you all could never handle a full tank.
Well yes but no. Tanking by fielding a g-league team is one thing, tanking in spite of having your supposed core pieces on the court is another. So if during the season we suck cos everyone is injured and Frank Kaminsky is our go to player, ok! If we suck cos Fox and Bagley are trash ... hooboy.Contrary to all those loud posts about wanting Hinkie to bring the process to the Kings over the offseason, you all could never handle a full tank.
Contrary to all those loud posts about wanting Hinkie to bring the process to the Kings over the offseason, you all could never handle a full tank.
I like how everybody is jumping the gun here. I’m not saying we gonna be good but give it 15-20 games to see how things mesh and then let the complaining begin lol
He's a second round pick that some folks had as a late first rounder; on short camp, no Summer League. I would hate it if the flip side of Halliburton looking NBA ready is that we wrote off Ramsey (I don't think we will, and he looked terrible on Tuesday).
Gotta remember that all these kids have had a shortened camp and no summer league like rookies would have had in a normal year.He's a second round pick that some folks had as a late first rounder; on short camp, no Summer League. I would hate it if the flip side of Halliburton looking NBA ready is that we wrote off Ramsey (I don't think we will, and he looked terrible on Tuesday).
Amazing the anti Bagley crew on here is never going to give it a rest. He used his off hand, which has been one of his biggest criticisms on here, and finished in the post going right but I guess we’re going to just ignore that. Or ignore how he was the only one out there after the game was over getting his free throws up when the whole team deserved to be out there shooting with him after that performance from the line. I sure hope it’s not fans like this bunch that eventually drives Bags to another team with all the constant criticism because we can’t move on from a draft that took place nearly 3 years ago at this pointFox’s jumper looks terrible in pre-season and I’m still waiting for Bagley to impress me.
Amazing the anti Bagley crew on here is never going to give it a rest. He used his off hand, which has been one of his biggest criticisms on here, and finished in the post going right but I guess we’re going to just ignore that. Or ignore how he was the only one out there after the game was over getting his free throws up when the whole team deserved to be out there shooting with him after that performance from the line. I sure hope it’s not fans like this bunch that eventually drives Bags to another team with all the constant criticism because we can’t move on from a draft that took place nearly 3 years ago at this point
Once more, what is the alternative? I already said if he's the impediment to winning at a respectable level then cross that bridge when you come to it. They ain't there yet and the truth is even with defensive shortcomings he's probably a big part of getting there anyway. Making decisions based on your defense with what Walton has done with his lineups and the results that followed is like a starving person eating the bag the sandwich came in and throwing the rest away because the bag has less carbs.