Potential Free Agent/Trade/Sign Tracker, '25-'26 Season

Monte drafted Hali, not Vlade
I understand he did. But we had that draft pick leftover from the Vlade era. I don't think that was some diamond in the rough pick. Hali was top 5 and slipped for some weird reason. Maybe Vlade doesn't make that pick, but even take that away. Vlade left us with Fox + #11 pick + Buddy as our only bad contract.

Monte left us with Monk, Derozan, LaVine, Sabonis combining for 130-135 million a year. That is disgusting.
 
I'd say it was an easier path to building a real roster.
You had Fox/Tyrese as building blocks, and not much for bad contracts on the roster. Buddy was the worst, and he was making Monk money. Vlade had a lot of faults but he left us in a much better spot than we are now
Not only was Buddy making more than Monk, but the salary cap was lower. When we traded Buddy he was making 20% (exactly) of the salary cap. Monk is currently making 12.2% of the cap. Buddy was making the equivalent of $31M today. It was a bad contract, for sure.
 
Not only was Buddy making more than Monk, but the salary cap was lower. When we traded Buddy he was making 20% (exactly) of the salary cap. Monk is currently making 12.2% of the cap. Buddy was making the equivalent of $31M today. It was a bad contract, for sure.
To add to my point about how hes not even in the same realm as the trio we have today.
1. This was during a time when the 2nd apron did not exist. Teams like the Clippers, Warriors, Celtics, Lakers, etc disregarded the cap completely.
2. Buddy was fresh off near back to back 20ppg seasons shooting 40+% from 3.
3. Buddy was often rumored to be in trade talks. The near Lakers deal where we almost acquired a combo of Kuzma/Harrell and a pick before LA pivoted to Westbrook.

What we are hearing from Sac media right now is essentially that Monk at best had neutral value (det was willing to take him in exchange for no assets, are other teams?) and Demar/LaVine are not tradable without us attaching incentive.

Buddy the day Monte took over was a positive asset that teams were interested in trading for. Later he became a malcontent and it was clear the team was heading towards a breakup, and he became negative. But it's revisionist to pretend otherwise.
 
Find us a 4 with size that can defend. Trade a guard. Call it a day and see how the season goes. If things go bad, get that lottery pick right, take a swing in the second round with that Charlotte pick and then depending on how things go, make a move. That’s how I see it anyway.

What's the point really. See if Jones can be that guy. That's a much better call. If this team is trash it will be known by the deadline and then it's waiting out contracts or dumping time. The Kings have Saric, might as well just use him. He was somewhat decent with the Dubs recently.
 
Do not move the goalposts. You said Buddy was making "Monk money". He was not, he was making significantly more.
For that i was wrong. Relative to the cap, you are right it was significantly more. However the entire point still stands. Our cap sheet was far cleaner at that time, and buddy was viewed as a positive asset unlike these 3.
 
Monte left us with more talent on the roster I think the issue here is that the new CBA makes teams resistant to take on Monk or DDR and give anything back even though both signings appear very reasonable compared to many second contracts being handed out. Hopefully having a real PG on the team can showcase them for moves while also help the young guys learn to play correctly.

I would still feel a lot better winning 30 games with the young guys getting 10-20mpg than winning < 20 and giving them 24mpg and letting them develop bad habits, but we need to get some additional FRP from other teams for Monk and DDR later down the road to make that gamble pay off a bit.
 
I still like Chris Boucher (especially if DeRozan comes off the bench and if we can move Monk for something that isn’t a guard)…

PG - Schroder / Carter / ???
SG - LaVine / Ellis / Davis
SF - Murray / DeRozan / Clifford
PF - Boucher / Raynaud / Saric
C - Sabonis / Eubanks / Jones

Although not sexy, that starting unit is at least balanced. Let it ride for one more year and then you have both LaVine and DeRozan on expirings.
 
Last edited:
I still like Chris Boucher (especially if DeRozan comes off the bench and if we can move Monk for something that isn’t a guard)…

PG - Schroder / Carter / ???
SG - LaVine / Ellis / Davis
SF - Murray / DeRozan / Clifford
PF - Boucher / Raynaud / Jones
C - Sabonis / ??? / Eubanks

Although not sexy, that starting unit is at least balanced. Let it ride for one more year and then you have both LaVine and DeRozan on expirings.
Like 5 years too late on Boucher, but better late than never i guess
 
As I posted in the draft day thread, Nique Clifford's mid-range jump shot looks a lot like DeRozan's. Who better to mentor the kid from Colorado? At this point, I am lost as to how Malik Monk will used under the new regime, if he even remains on the team, but backup point guard would be a very good choice for his talents. Drew Eubanks might get the nod over Jones, who then would be a backup PF/C? Isaac is still learning the game.
The team looks like this now (after Makaveli):

Sabonis/Eubanks/Maxime
Keegan/Šarić/Jones
Demar/Nique
LaVine/Keon/Carter
Schröder/Monk/Carter

It would be similar to last year in that the first unit is offense-oriented, and the second unit defense-oriented, pretty much the opposite of what the Perry, Armstrong, and Christie have talked about. We still have the two former Bulls playing together. LaVine had a horrendous 119.9 defensive rating, according to the NBA stats, next to last on the team. DeRozan was better at 115.3, compared to 114.5 for Monk and 113.9 for Sabonis.

I doubt that Šarić will be an upgrade over Trey Lyles if he is playing third string in the Euro League right now. He did pull in 8.6 rebounds per 36 minutes, compared to 8.4 for Lyles, but only played in 16 games last season for the Nuggets. Šarić had a good season the previous year for Golden State, but is no more a shot blocker than Lyles. Nor is Drew Eubanks, for that matter, unlike Isaac Jones.
 
Last edited:
Like 5 years too late on Boucher, but better late than never i guess
Maybe not? His advanced impact stats are very good…

EPM = 92nd
VPM = 80th
DPM = 54th
LEBRON = 104th
2Y RAPM = 22nd
eRAPTOR = 100th
MAMBA = 88th

He’s got great length for a PF…

Height w/o Shoes = 6’8”
Wingspan = 7’4”
Standing Reach = 9’2.5”

And his per 36 min stats were solid as well (albeit he only averaged 17.2 mpg)…

.615 TS%
15.5 FGA
.492 FG%
8.1 3PA
.363 3P%
7.4 2PA
.633 2P%
3.6 FTA
.782 FT%
21.0 PTS
9.4 REB
1.4 AST
1.0 STL
1.0 BLK
1.2 TO
2.8 PF
 
Maybe not? His advanced impact stats are very good…

EPM = 92nd
VPM = 80th
DPM = 54th
LEBRON = 104th
2Y RAPM = 22nd
eRAPTOR = 100th
MAMBA = 88th

He’s got great length for a PF…

Height w/o Shoes = 6’8”
Wingspan = 7’4”
Standing Reach = 9’2.5”

And his per 36 min stats were solid as well (albeit he only averaged 17.2 mpg)…

.615 TS%
15.5 FGA
.492 FG%
8.1 3PA
.363 3P%
7.4 2PA
.633 2P%
3.6 FTA
.782 FT%
21.0 PTS
9.4 REB
1.4 AST
1.0 STL
1.0 BLK
1.2 TO
2.8 PF

Good stuff. For some reason, I thought he regressed a bit this year.

He was just a glaring target a few years back.
 
Maybe not? His advanced impact stats are very good…

EPM = 92nd
VPM = 80th
DPM = 54th
LEBRON = 104th
2Y RAPM = 22nd
eRAPTOR = 100th
MAMBA = 88th

He’s got great length for a PF…

Height w/o Shoes = 6’8”
Wingspan = 7’4”
Standing Reach = 9’2.5”

And his per 36 min stats were solid as well (albeit he only averaged 17.2 mpg)…

.615 TS%
15.5 FGA
.492 FG%
8.1 3PA
.363 3P%
7.4 2PA
.633 2P%
3.6 FTA
.782 FT%
21.0 PTS
9.4 REB
1.4 AST
1.0 STL
1.0 BLK
1.2 TO
2.8 PF

I am very on board with a Boucher signing :)
 
The team looks like this now (after Makaveli):

Sabonis/Eubanks/Maxime
Keegan/Šarić/Jones
Demar/Nique
LaVine/Keon/Carter
Schröder/Monk/Carter

It would be similar to last year in that the first unit is offense-oriented, and the second unit defense-oriented, pretty much the opposite of what the Perry, Armstrong, and Christie have talked about. We still have the two former Bulls playing together. LaVine had a horrendous 119.9 defensive rating, according to the NBA stats, next to last on the team. DeRozan was better at 115.3, compared to 114.5 for Monk and 113.9 for Sabonis.

I doubt that Šarić will be an upgrade over Trey Lyles if he is playing third string in the Euro League right now. He did pull in 8.6 rebounds per 36 minutes, compared to 8.4 for Lyles, but only played in 16 games last season for the Nuggets. Šarić had a good season the previous year for Golden State, but is no more a shot blocker than Lyles. Nor is Drew Eubanks, for that matter, unlike Isaac Jones.
Everything would look different if LaVine moved to small forward and Keon started at shooting guard. Ellis makes that much of an impact, and having DeRozan come off the bench would eliminate the ball-stopping phenomenon we saw all too often last season.
 
Last edited:
Everything would look different if LaVine moved to small forward and Keon started at shooting guard. Ellis makes that much of an impact, and having DeRozan come off the bench would eliminate the ball-stopping phenomenon we saw all to often last season.

We would have made the playoffs if they did this last year and balance out the offensive hubs. But noooo egos
 
Maybe not? His advanced impact stats are very good…

EPM = 92nd
VPM = 80th
DPM = 54th
LEBRON = 104th
2Y RAPM = 22nd
eRAPTOR = 100th
MAMBA = 88th

He’s got great length for a PF…

Height w/o Shoes = 6’8”
Wingspan = 7’4”
Standing Reach = 9’2.5”

And his per 36 min stats were solid as well (albeit he only averaged 17.2 mpg)…

.615 TS%
15.5 FGA
.492 FG%
8.1 3PA
.363 3P%
7.4 2PA
.633 2P%
3.6 FTA
.782 FT%
21.0 PTS
9.4 REB
1.4 AST
1.0 STL
1.0 BLK
1.2 TO
2.8 PF
Those are great stats, I agree. It looks like a couple of other teams are interested, too.
 
Back
Top