I know it's probably not the most popular pick but I really think Brooks would be great here.
As unimaginative OKC's offense is, Scott have a lot of things we need:
1. He is very good with players- a lot of reporters claim he is still the head coach because of his close relationship with the players and his control in the locker room, I think we all saw the importance of that after Malone was fired.
2. track record of developing talent- KD was bound to be a star. but although a lot of the credit need to go to the GM for drafting the fact that 3 of the guys he coached (KD, Westbrook. Harden) are now considered top 10 players, Ibaka became one of the best PF, Adams became a legit starter at center coming in incredibly raw, Jackson looks like a starting PG and guys like Roberson all the sudden looking like ok roleplayers should be considered as one of his greater successes.
3. good defense- OKC under him showed good defense, though he is no Thibs, he has done a good job on that end.
4. who said simple was bad? after all that NBA 3.0 talk- i'd like a coach who will play a simple style to our strengthes instead inforcing a system that doesn't fit our roster.
5. he might be actually available
Brooks is not a great coach, you may call it a filler, but I see Brooks as the type of coach who will take you in a positive direction but only to a certain level.
he is not a X's and O's genius but he is very good at uniting a team and developing talent- and I think on this stage that's what we need.
In time we could reconsider the coaching job but with this current roster I really don't think having a great innovator will change a whole lot.
what we need is someone that will be able to build a functional and committed group, and I truly believe he could do that- and who knows- he is still young as a coach maybe he'll get more creative later on.