because of the tremendous and unnecessary disruption of progress it created, the league-wide ridicule it earned, the exodus of fans emptying out of sleep train arena it has resulted in, and the damage it may ultimately cause to the kings' longterm relationship with demarcus cousins. michael malone could have been fired during this last offseason, thus avoiding the unnecessary mid-season disruption and league-wide ridicule, or he could have been fired this upcoming offseason, thus avoiding the unnecessary mid-season disruption and league-wide ridicule. what is the compelling basketball argument for firing michael malone so early in the season, without an adequate replacement lined up (and no, i do not qualify tyrone corbin as an "adequate replacement")?
my suspicion is that PDA was intent on firing malone while he was able to do so. mike malone at 11-13 is much easier to fire than mike malone at 44-38, 41-41, or even 38-44 (if we want to be ungenerous and assume that the kings would have sustained their 11-13 pace under malone, even with a healthy demarcus cousins returning to the lineup). the more the kings improved on their win total from the last couple of seasons, the more the team continued to "buy in" to mike malone's system, the more they grew together as a team, and the more they backed their head coach, the harder it would be for the front office to justify firing malone, so PDA opportunistically took advantage of the stretch of losses the kings endured in the absence of demarcus cousins when viral meningitis struck...
for the record, i do not believe it is unfair at all to characterize pete d'alessandro's comments as "style above wins." in the wake of michael malone's firing, PDA has repeatedly emphasized that the direction malone was taking the team did not represent the identity that the front office desired for the team. they were not swayed by the results that malone was wringing from a fairly untalented roster (read: establishment of a new culture, team-oriented growth, defensive improvement, efficiency of the starting unit, and measurable gains in the win column); they cared more about their proposed "vision" or "identity" or "philosophy" for the team. so, until that "vision" or "identity" or "philosophy" results in at least the establishment of a new culture, team-oriented growth, defensive improvement, efficiency of the starting unit, and measurable gains in the win column, i will steadfastly argue that the kings' brass are best-characterized as "style above wins"...