Probably because Ronnie Price has outplayed him so far.
Rookie tutelage.
He's gotta watch and learn from Bibby and Martin. Plus you make him so hungry to play that when he does come in, he does better than expected out of fear of not seeing more PT.
We have more players than you can have active at any one time. Somebody has to be "inactive"... right now it's Douby.
How many players can you dress? Is this the same # for home or away games? I hope we activated Pot now that we do need the size off the bench behind SAR.
A team must have 12 players on its active roster, although they can drop to 11 for up to two weeks at a time. They must suit up at least eight players for every game. Any remaining players must be on its Inactive List, and are ineligible to play in games. A team must have a minimum of one and a maximum of three players on its Inactive List, although they can drop to zero for up to two weeks at a time, and can temporarily have four with league approval in the event of a hardship. The composition of the Inactive List can change on a game-by-game basis -- no less than 60 minutes prior to tipoff, the team must present to the official scorer a list of the players who will be active for that game. A player can be inactive for as little as one game. While individual teams are only required to carry 13 players (12 active and one inactive), the NBA also guarantees a league-wide average of at least 14 players per team. The league is surcharged if they do not meet this obligation.
I still think he might be able to do that at some level, but 1/2 tweeners are kind of an ick position and even the pretty good ones struggle to establish steady roles.
And if Douby had Arenas or Gordon talent, or were on a go-nowhere team like any of those second group of guys, then he might be able to get minutes. And we wouldn't be having this conversation.I agree with most of what you're saying, but the combo 1/2 under 6'4" has been pretty fertile ground in the NBA lately. Not just the stars (Wade, Gordon, Arenas and patron saint Allen Iverson) but some promising young guys as well (Foye, Jack, Head, Tony Allen, Lowry, Roberson, Monta Ellis etc. etc.)
And if Douby had Arenas or Gordon talent, or were on a go-nowhere team like any of those second group of guys, then he might be able to get minutes. And we wouldn't be having this conversation.
But he doesn't, and he's not, so he can't. And we are.
I agree with most of what you're saying, but the combo 1/2 under 6'4" has been pretty fertile ground in the NBA lately. Not just the stars (Wade, Gordon, Arenas and patron saint Allen Iverson) but some promising young guys as well (Foye, Jack, Head, Tony Allen, Lowry, Roberson, Monta Ellis etc. etc.)
I think you're right that unless these guys are stars they struggle to find a position in the starting lineup, but a combo 1/2 off the bench in the Bobby Jackson mode is a great thing to have.
Aside from Foye that second group isn't promising, its problematic. Actually illustrating my point -- random undersized guys without a position, who will likely never be able to really nail downa long term role wiht anybody, and who will bounce around and then disappear. That's the fate of 99% of tweener guards.
We'll ignore Wade (a well built OG) and Arenas (can really play the PG). Douby is more like an Iverson (but A.I. can really play the PG too when motivated and of course is >>>>> Douby) or Gordon. Of course I consider Gordon himself highly problematic for the Bulls -- they don't know quite what to do with him. Nobody does with tweener guards. They don't fit, can't do the things you need them to do, and are a constant threat to be taken advanatage of on the other end. If they can't, like a Bobby or Arenas, develop sufficient PG skills to hide them over at a position along with guys of their same size and build, their lives as OGs are often nasty, brutish and short.
But, as I previously stated, all of those guys are on non-competitive teams, unlike Douby. Except for Houston, which is competitive, but has no depth whatsoever at PG.I know it's early, but Monta Ellis is averaging 16 points off the bench for the Warriors, Jack is averaging 12 as a starter for the Blazers, Head is averaging 7.5 off the bench for the Rockets (including a 17 point performance against the Mavs). These aren't guys struggling with their roles, they're solid contributors showing a lot of promise. They're not in danger of bouncing out.
But, as I previously stated, all of those guys are on non-competitive teams, unlike Douby. Except for Houston, which is competitive, but has no depth whatsoever at PG.
Put Monta Ellis on the Kings instead of Douby, and he doesn't play, either.
But wait, didn't all the "experts" say the Warriors are going to make the playoffs? I mean, personally I think they still suck but don't they at least count as a competitive team?
I agree with you that with the current players the Kings have that someone like Ellis probably wouldn't play much either, but I don't agree that a combo guard can't play for a good team. It's not like the combo guards I listed are the only ones. You have Barbosa on the Suns, Bell on the Bucks... they're everywhere.
Since when do *I* give a spit about what the "experts" think? I can see with my own eyes that the Warriors stink.But wait, didn't all the "experts" say the Warriors are going to make the playoffs? I mean, personally I think they still suck but don't they at least count as a competitive team?
Why dont we just assign quincy to a d-league team and get some confidence for a while.
Let's also not forget that Golden State's depth at point guard consisted precisely of Gilbert Arenas and Earl Boykins. So, unless your plan is to make Arenas play forty-eight minutes, why wouldn't he play Boykins.Lets not forget Earl Boykins whom Muss loved at Golden State.