Not sure if im late, but why is Quincy Douby inactive?

Rookie tutelage.

He's gotta watch and learn from Bibby and Martin. Plus you make him so hungry to play that when he does come in, he does better than expected out of fear of not seeing more PT.
 
Douby

Rookie tutelage.

He's gotta watch and learn from Bibby and Martin. Plus you make him so hungry to play that when he does come in, he does better than expected out of fear of not seeing more PT.

Muss will not play rookies. Douby is first first-round pick in my memory to not play at all at start of season. Plus, he isn't even dressing. this is beyond ridiculous. For example, he could of played at end of Milw game when Muss put in the scrubs.
 
We have more players than you can have active at any one time. Somebody has to be "inactive"... right now it's Douby.
 
We have more players than you can have active at any one time. Somebody has to be "inactive"... right now it's Douby.

How many players can you dress? Is this the same # for home or away games? I hope we activated Pot now that we do need the size off the bench behind SAR.
 
How many players can you dress? Is this the same # for home or away games? I hope we activated Pot now that we do need the size off the bench behind SAR.

Here you go:

A team must have 12 players on its active roster, although they can drop to 11 for up to two weeks at a time. They must suit up at least eight players for every game. Any remaining players must be on its Inactive List, and are ineligible to play in games. A team must have a minimum of one and a maximum of three players on its Inactive List, although they can drop to zero for up to two weeks at a time, and can temporarily have four with league approval in the event of a hardship. The composition of the Inactive List can change on a game-by-game basis -- no less than 60 minutes prior to tipoff, the team must present to the official scorer a list of the players who will be active for that game. A player can be inactive for as little as one game. While individual teams are only required to carry 13 players (12 active and one inactive), the NBA also guarantees a league-wide average of at least 14 players per team. The league is surcharged if they do not meet this obligation.

This is from the premiere source of information about the collective bargaining agreement:

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#64
 
When we are in games and trying to pull it out, it makes no sense to put a rookie in at the is point, maybe early on in the game, right now the team needs to focus on chemisty with the guys who are going to be playing regulary.
 
We all need to be patient with Douby. Rutgers wasn't exactly on the Western Carolina level of basketball Siberia, but he's still someone who picked up the game late and there's a big transition from Rutgers to the NBA. At the same time, I really liked what I saw in the preseason in the few minutes I saw Douby play. He is able to set up his own shot very well and get separation on his man, he looked better-than-advertised on defense, and his long arms make him play taller than he is. As I said in another thread it's way way too early to start drawing conclusions on how good or bad he's going to be. It's going to take time.
 
Remains a man without a position, which combined with his rookiehood makes him vulnerable to being left off the roster. Figure we've got two big guards who can handle (Salmons/Garcia), a little tweener (Price), and a pure backup PG (Hart). Doesn;t leave much room for yet another little tweener. Price's emergence left Quincy the odd man out for the time being. To make the roster think he would either have to outperform Price as a little tweener, or Hart as a true PG.

Not sure about the long term yet. Douby is just a basketball player. He's not built to be an NBA player, has no position. So he's probably not going to be able to just naturally slide into a backup role at any one position. So he's going to have to make it just as a "player". Just on pure talent. I still think he might be able to do that at some level, but 1/2 tweeners are kind of an ick position and even the pretty good ones struggle to establish steady roles.
 
I still think he might be able to do that at some level, but 1/2 tweeners are kind of an ick position and even the pretty good ones struggle to establish steady roles.

I agree with most of what you're saying, but the combo 1/2 under 6'4" has been pretty fertile ground in the NBA lately. Not just the stars (Wade, Gordon, Arenas and patron saint Allen Iverson) but some promising young guys as well (Foye, Jack, Head, Tony Allen, Lowry, Roberson, Monta Ellis etc. etc.)

I think you're right that unless these guys are stars they struggle to find a position in the starting lineup, but a combo 1/2 off the bench in the Bobby Jackson mode is a great thing to have.
 
I agree with most of what you're saying, but the combo 1/2 under 6'4" has been pretty fertile ground in the NBA lately. Not just the stars (Wade, Gordon, Arenas and patron saint Allen Iverson) but some promising young guys as well (Foye, Jack, Head, Tony Allen, Lowry, Roberson, Monta Ellis etc. etc.)
And if Douby had Arenas or Gordon talent, or were on a go-nowhere team like any of those second group of guys, then he might be able to get minutes. And we wouldn't be having this conversation.

But he doesn't, and he's not, so he can't. And we are.
 
who would you rather have "active" (and playing even garbage minutes)....Douby or Hart? Douby's moves in preseason was quite good for a rookie who picked up the game late. He can definitely get his shots and has skills. I hope he gets the chance to develop his game.
 
And if Douby had Arenas or Gordon talent, or were on a go-nowhere team like any of those second group of guys, then he might be able to get minutes. And we wouldn't be having this conversation.

But he doesn't, and he's not, so he can't. And we are.

It's too early to know whether Douby has Arenas or Gordon talent -- the odds are probably against it, but if Kevin Martin shows anything it's not to prejudge the cieling of 22 year old works-in-progress.

Although I agree that he'd have a better shot at minutes on a bad team.
 
Our stockpiling of tweener-type guards is a little like owning Baltic and Mediterranean in the game of Monopoly. Nice affordable purple properties but not big on returns.
 
I agree with most of what you're saying, but the combo 1/2 under 6'4" has been pretty fertile ground in the NBA lately. Not just the stars (Wade, Gordon, Arenas and patron saint Allen Iverson) but some promising young guys as well (Foye, Jack, Head, Tony Allen, Lowry, Roberson, Monta Ellis etc. etc.)

I think you're right that unless these guys are stars they struggle to find a position in the starting lineup, but a combo 1/2 off the bench in the Bobby Jackson mode is a great thing to have.


Aside from Foye that second group isn't promising, its problematic. Actually illustrating my point -- random undersized guys without a position, who will likely never be able to really nail downa long term role wiht anybody, and who will bounce around and then disappear. That's the fate of 99% of tweener guards.

We'll ignore Wade (a well built OG) and Arenas (can really play the PG). Douby is more like an Iverson (but A.I. can really play the PG too when motivated and of course is >>>>> Douby) or Gordon. Of course I consider Gordon himself highly problematic for the Bulls -- they don't know quite what to do with him. Nobody does with tweener guards. They don't fit, can't do the things you need them to do, and are a constant threat to be taken advanatage of on the other end. If they can't, like a Bobby or Arenas, develop sufficient PG skills to hide them over at a position along with guys of their same size and build, their lives as OGs are often nasty, brutish and short.
 
Aside from Foye that second group isn't promising, its problematic. Actually illustrating my point -- random undersized guys without a position, who will likely never be able to really nail downa long term role wiht anybody, and who will bounce around and then disappear. That's the fate of 99% of tweener guards.

We'll ignore Wade (a well built OG) and Arenas (can really play the PG). Douby is more like an Iverson (but A.I. can really play the PG too when motivated and of course is >>>>> Douby) or Gordon. Of course I consider Gordon himself highly problematic for the Bulls -- they don't know quite what to do with him. Nobody does with tweener guards. They don't fit, can't do the things you need them to do, and are a constant threat to be taken advanatage of on the other end. If they can't, like a Bobby or Arenas, develop sufficient PG skills to hide them over at a position along with guys of their same size and build, their lives as OGs are often nasty, brutish and short.

I know it's early, but Monta Ellis is averaging 16 points off the bench for the Warriors, Jack is averaging 12 as a starter for the Blazers, Head is averaging 7.5 off the bench for the Rockets (including a 17 point performance against the Mavs). These aren't guys struggling with their roles, they're solid contributors showing a lot of promise. They're not in danger of bouncing out.

And unlike teams like the Bulls, who admittedly struggle at times with Gordon's role, the Kings are actually perfectly built to accommodate a tweener 1/2 because of all the tall ballhandlers. Salmons, Garcia and Artest can all handle the ball, opening up the potential for, say, a Douby/Salmons backcourt that could leave the ballhandling to Salmons and play Douby as a shooting guard on offense (but Salmons guards the 2 on defense). Sort of like what the Sixers did with Eric Snow and Iverson back in the day. Even without Salmons, though, Douby has the handle to get the ball up the floor and initiate the offense through Artest or Miller.

So where some teams would struggle with a 1/2 I actually think Douby has the potential to thrive with the other Kings players, just as players like him are doing well with other teams.
 
Last edited:
I know it's early, but Monta Ellis is averaging 16 points off the bench for the Warriors, Jack is averaging 12 as a starter for the Blazers, Head is averaging 7.5 off the bench for the Rockets (including a 17 point performance against the Mavs). These aren't guys struggling with their roles, they're solid contributors showing a lot of promise. They're not in danger of bouncing out.
But, as I previously stated, all of those guys are on non-competitive teams, unlike Douby. Except for Houston, which is competitive, but has no depth whatsoever at PG.

Put Monta Ellis on the Kings instead of Douby, and he doesn't play, either.
 
But, as I previously stated, all of those guys are on non-competitive teams, unlike Douby. Except for Houston, which is competitive, but has no depth whatsoever at PG.

Put Monta Ellis on the Kings instead of Douby, and he doesn't play, either.

But wait, didn't all the "experts" say the Warriors are going to make the playoffs? I mean, personally I think they still suck but don't they at least count as a competitive team?

I agree with you that with the current players the Kings have that someone like Ellis probably wouldn't play much either, but I don't agree that a combo guard can't play for a good team. It's not like the combo guards I listed are the only ones. You have Barbosa on the Suns, Bell on the Bucks... they're everywhere.
 
But wait, didn't all the "experts" say the Warriors are going to make the playoffs? I mean, personally I think they still suck but don't they at least count as a competitive team?

I agree with you that with the current players the Kings have that someone like Ellis probably wouldn't play much either, but I don't agree that a combo guard can't play for a good team. It's not like the combo guards I listed are the only ones. You have Barbosa on the Suns, Bell on the Bucks... they're everywhere.

You have noted who coaches the Warriors right?

But actually that's not entirely true -- not even Nellie likes combo guards as a rule. He's a small ball expert, but he likes playing OGs at SF and SFs at PF, not scrawny strignbeans at OG. His OGs are normally full grown -- Mitch and Sarunas and Spree and Finley.

And guys like Bell or Jack are PGs who basically never play OG anymore. That IS the route for a "combo guard" to make it -- learn to play the right position for your body, at least well enough to get minutes if not have impact. Not all can do it unfortunately. Alternately you can just be so very very good it doesn't matter. But you have to actually make the active roster before you can think about heading down that route.
 
But wait, didn't all the "experts" say the Warriors are going to make the playoffs? I mean, personally I think they still suck but don't they at least count as a competitive team?
Since when do *I* give a spit about what the "experts" think? I can see with my own eyes that the Warriors stink.
 
Give him a chance? Geez, we are barely into the season. Price hardly played last year, Kevin the year before that. Give it some time.

I don't know about D league sometimes. If he stays with the Kings, he gets to be mentored by and practice with NBA-proven players, gets to learn Musselman's defensive and offensive systems, gets to work with the assistant coahes and the Kings conditioning coach. That seems like a lot of pluses to me for him compared to going to D league.

All comments about Douby so far seem positive from the team.

Possibly Hart may is active right now instead, because he is a true PG and Bibby is not 100% right now.
 
Lets not forget Earl Boykins whom Muss loved at Golden State.
Let's also not forget that Golden State's depth at point guard consisted precisely of Gilbert Arenas and Earl Boykins. So, unless your plan is to make Arenas play forty-eight minutes, why wouldn't he play Boykins.

As poor as our PG rotation is, Douby still hasn't managed to supplant either Price or Hart. That tells me all I need to know about whether or not Douby needs to be given more minutes.
 
Ask Quincy Douby or any other guy where they'd rather be... sitting on the bench with an NBA team or in the D League. I can pretty much guarantee the response would be the same from virtually each and every one of them. They would much rather be with the NBA team, practicing with the big guys and learning the plays than in the developmental league.
 
No, but the kings could at least put him in the dl for a bit... I mean he would still be on the kings roster and all, but just to see him play a bit. I mean martell webster was put in the dl last year... same with guys like dorell wright. Not like it can hurt them... I just wanna see him play.
 
Back
Top