Standing at 6ft 5, weighing a whopping 120 kg and running 10.8 seconds (100m) makes him an once in a lifetime athlete.
As one of potentially only a few Cowboys fans on this board, I am glad that the Boys of Big D were able to pull it off in the end. Not having Dez for a few weeks is gonna suck, though.As a Niner fan, it makes me feel good to see the Raiders continue doing Raider things. Also, as I find the Cowboys annoying as all get-out (or maybe just many of their fans), I was sad to see the Giants blow the game at the end. Just run down the clock on third down and kick the FG. Argh. Glad Seattle lost, though.
And no, I don't expect anything from the Niners this year. They will pleasantly surprise me if they go 0.500.
Yes, I dislike Tony Romo. No, I do not understand those Cowboys fans who believe in the dude; I really do not. And I never will.
For every clutch performance, there are multiple (2 or more) choke performances. That's why.Seriously! After yet another clutch performance from Romo I still don't know why people believe in him.![]()
For every clutch performance, there are multiple (2 or more) choke performances. That's why.
Then you certainly haven't watched enough Cowboys games when it mattered/matters the most (December, January).I actually don't think that's true, but I can understand why people have that impression.
I never said he is a bad quarterback; he actually is a very good quarterback. What I said was, however, that I do not believe in the guy. He is a darn good quarterback if you want your team to get to the post season. He hasn't shown me enough to declare that I believe he can take us to the Super Bowl. That is what I am saying.I've watched enough and I've also seen enough data that I trust that over a fan's memory. I understand if you don't like the ups and downs of a clutch quarterback (as all clutch quarterbacks also have stinky performances when it matters), especially one with heartbreaking losses like Romo, but it seems pretty clear according to the evidence he is actually very good overall when it matters.
I've watched enough and I've also seen enough data that I trust that over a fan's memory. I understand if you don't like the ups and downs of a clutch quarterback (as all clutch quarterbacks also have stinky performances when it matters), especially one with heartbreaking losses like Romo, but it seems pretty clear according to the evidence he is actually very good overall when it matters.
Basically, all I am saying here is.......Tony Romo is a good quarterback; Tony Romo is not a great quarterback.I never said he is a bad quarterback; he actually is a very good quarterback. What I said was, however, that I do not believe in the guy. He is a darn good quarterback if you want your team to get to the post season. He hasn't shown me enough to declare that I believe he can take us to the Super Bowl. That is what I am saying.
NINERS!!!!!
NINERS!!!!!
Not to downplay last night's performance or anything, but as uolj mentioned, Minnesota is not that great. The Niners went out and did exactly what they were supposed to do, and that was to take care of a crappy team. Let's see how well they fare against the real competition.Yeah, well, not a bad start huh?
Plenty of concerns, of course, and I'm not sure Minnesota is that great, but it sure seems like the defense might still be good and I love what Hyde was able to do consistently getting big gains.
That win last night was amazing!!!!! Any win against the Sheagles is amazing!!!!!!!!I'm intrigued in watching the Falcons this year....they have so much talent they should be better record wise than last.
Because I like the Cowboys.why you no like the Eagles?
Not to downplay last night's performance or anything, but ...
I'm sorry if I came across as a jerk. That was not my intention at all. My point was that the Vikings are not a good team, and I, personally, don't like to get too excited about beating a sub par team. I say that about the Cowboys all the time. And, honestly, I will say the same about the Kings when the time comes.I quit reading after the word "but"... Sorry, Cowboys fan, but I learned eons ago not to pay any attention to anything said with that kind of passive/aggressive disclaimer. You sound way too much like Laker fan IMHO.
I am a Niners fan. I will celebrate every single win just as I have for a very long time. I'll be blunt - I don't care what a fan of another team thinks and, because you're new here, I'll give you fair warning. I care about the Niners almost as much as I care about the Kings.
![]()
I'm sorry if I came across as a jerk. That was not my intention at all. My point was that the Vikings are not a good team, and I, personally, don't like to get too excited about beating a sub par team. I say that about the Cowboys all the time. And, honestly, I will say the same about the Kings when the time comes.
I'm sorry, but I, personally, can't get too excited about any of my teams beating those teams they're supposed to beat.
You can enjoy your win as much as you like. I ain't stopping ya. I was just stating my opinion.
Despite what you think, 99% of people would agree the 49ers weren't "supposed" to beat the Vikings.
When did the Vikings become a team they weren't supposed to beat?
When the Niners became the team that wasn't supposed to really beat anyone. Did you catch any of them in preseason? Horrible!
Going into the game, for the Vikings the return of AP was huge. Supposedly good defense. Good young QB.
No way in hell were the Niners a shoe in to beat the Vikings...... Not even saying that the Vikings were "supposed" to beat the Niners. IMO it was a toss up at the least.
People make too much out of preseason...you can't evaluate a team in the preseason. Preseason is to evaluate your teams depth.
Lol Just stop. Preseason isn't even the main reason at all.