[NEWS] Disney to buy Marvel

#62


I feel some kind of way about this list including a villain, a guy who got murked in his first appearance, and a guy whose power is, "chauffeur," but no Captain Marvel, no Sif, no Heimdall, no Warriors Three, No Wong, or any Wakandans not named T'Challa. Hell, not even Mantis.
Agreed. $7 on Vision, Scarlet Witch, and Dr. Strange. Remaining $8 to page Captain Marvel, and take a peremptive flyer on Magik.

Apparently the power to get "all the cheeseburgers in the world" makes you a second-tier superhero in the MCU.
 
Last edited:
#63
How is Vision only $1 ok I am all in on team $7. I'd probably grab Thor and Loki with the other 8. Are you kidding me with that kinda value? Is someone dumb enough to take Cap, Iron Man and Black Widow???
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
#67
Theaters are pretty much dead until COVID is anyways. There is no way in hell I plan to be in one anytime in the next 12 months.
Yeah, even as someone directly involved in the entertainment industry who has monetary interest in both attending and participating in theater events both filmed and performed, I have pretty much no desire to actually be in one for the foreseeable future and I live in a country that “has things under control”
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#68
Theaters are pretty much dead until COVID is anyways. There is no way in hell I plan to be in one anytime in the next 12 months.
That's self-evident. I'm just saying. Even if there wasn't a pandemic, theaters would be dead, if Disney can pull this off. $30.00 is less than you're going to have to pay for a family of four, just to get into the theater. Hell, a couple out on date night will spend more than that, on tickets.

That's not even factoring in travel, parking (everybody doesn't live someplace that movie theaters have free parking), snacks, etc. And that's not even taking into account things like not having to wedge your entire schedule into the time windows offered by the theaters. And about that aforementioned date night... if you've got young kids, and you can spend $30.00 to watch the movie at home, on opening night, guess what you don't have to spend money on? A babysitter! Put the kids to bed at 8, get UberEats, and watch the movie at 830.

I mean, I wouldn't pay thirty bucks to watch Mulan on opening weekend, when I know that I can wait six months, and catch it on the Disney+ subscription that I'm already paying for... But let me find out that I can see Black Panther 2 or Captain Marvel 2 or Shang-Chi on opening weekend, without having to go through the hassle of going to the theater... thirty bucks for that sounds like a steal, to me.
 

Warhawk

The cake is a lie.
Staff member
#69
That's self-evident. I'm just saying. Even if there wasn't a pandemic, theaters would be dead, if Disney can pull this off. $30.00 is less than you're going to have to pay for a family of four, just to get into the theater. Hell, a couple out on date night will spend more than that, on tickets.

That's not even factoring in travel, parking (everybody doesn't live someplace that movie theaters have free parking), snacks, etc. And that's not even taking into account things like not having to wedge your entire schedule into the time windows offered by the theaters. And about that aforementioned date night... if you've got young kids, and you can spend $30.00 to watch the movie at home, on opening night, guess what you don't have to spend money on? A babysitter! Put the kids to bed at 8, get UberEats, and watch the movie at 830.

I mean, I wouldn't pay thirty bucks to watch Mulan on opening weekend, when I know that I can wait six months, and catch it on the Disney+ subscription that I'm already paying for... But let me find out that I can see Black Panther 2 or Captain Marvel 2 or Shang-Chi on opening weekend, without having to go through the hassle of going to the theater... thirty bucks for that sounds like a steal, to me.
Agreed. My only frustration is that this is turning into a free-for-all on streaming services. I've had Netflix forever and the cost isn't bad, but it was a better deal when they were the only service in town. My wife signed up for Amazon Prime a few years ago so we do have Prime Video. We also signed up for Disney+ (for the 3 years for $140 deal and got another free year through Verizon - so that is a pretty darn good deal as well once they start actually releasing all the Marvel series they were promising).

But it seems like more and more channels are releasing stuff on their individual streaming services and I'm not paying for any more of those services than I already am. :)
 
#70
That's self-evident. I'm just saying. Even if there wasn't a pandemic, theaters would be dead, if Disney can pull this off. $30.00 is less than you're going to have to pay for a family of four, just to get into the theater. Hell, a couple out on date night will spend more than that, on tickets.

That's not even factoring in travel, parking (everybody doesn't live someplace that movie theaters have free parking), snacks, etc. And that's not even taking into account things like not having to wedge your entire schedule into the time windows offered by the theaters. And about that aforementioned date night... if you've got young kids, and you can spend $30.00 to watch the movie at home, on opening night, guess what you don't have to spend money on? A babysitter! Put the kids to bed at 8, get UberEats, and watch the movie at 830.

I mean, I wouldn't pay thirty bucks to watch Mulan on opening weekend, when I know that I can wait six months, and catch it on the Disney+ subscription that I'm already paying for... But let me find out that I can see Black Panther 2 or Captain Marvel 2 or Shang-Chi on opening weekend, without having to go through the hassle of going to the theater... thirty bucks for that sounds like a steal, to me.
But Disney is only doing this because of the pandemic which they stress in the article. Hamilton was supposed to be their major summer release, they did it with their spring Pixar property iirc. I don't think they are going to do this when theaters re-open although it may impact the future timing between theater/physical/streaming. But for now, not only does it maintain their release schedule but it's a major draw to their platform vs. putting it on Google play for a month at a $20 rental like all the other studios are doing right now.
 

Warhawk

The cake is a lie.
Staff member
#71
But Disney is only doing this because of the pandemic which they stress in the article. Hamilton was supposed to be their major summer release, they did it with their spring Pixar property iirc. I don't think they are going to do this when theaters re-open although it may impact the future timing between theater/physical/streaming. But for now, not only does it maintain their release schedule but it's a major draw to their platform vs. putting it on Google play for a month at a $20 rental like all the other studios are doing right now.
They also state that it is a test of sorts:
“We find it very interesting to take a premiere offering to consumers at that $29.99 price and learn from it,” said Chapek, noting that they would study the number of transactions and the number of subscribers generated by the movie.
You don't think that if it shows promise it won't be the only one?
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#72
But Disney is only doing this because of the pandemic which they stress in the article.
There's no counterfactual for that; I mean, the platform only preceded the pandemic by weeks.. They could very well have meant that the pandemic forced their hand. They might not have done this for Mulan, had it not been for the pandemic, but I absolutely believe that this was part of their long-term planning, because, why wouldn't it be? Why would Disney want to maintain the status quo, when they can eliminate the middleman, and keep all of the revenue? I absolutely believe that Disney planned to use a movie as a "trial balloon," to see how viable the idea was. They probably didn't intend for that movie to be Mulan but, of all the movies they have in post-production right now, this was definitely the best available option to try it on, because it's a family movie, and the people who would have gone to see it in the theaters, by and large, are not people that would have been going by themselves.


I don't think they are going to do this when theaters re-open although it may impact the future timing between theater/physical/streaming.
If this works, they're totally going to do it again.