So, the Hawks won their fourth game in a row, behind 30 points from Trae Young. and have taken over sole possession of fourth place in the eastern conference. Meanwhile, the Celtics got bodied at home by Philadelphia, and have dropped to a game below .500.
And this is your friendly reminder that Boston was one of three teams in the eastern conference that had two All-Stars, prior to the trade deadline. And Atlanta is not one of the other two.
So, last night, Damion Lee had a clear line to the basket, with his team down one, and a chance to win the game. Instead of taking the layup, he tries to make a bad pass out for a three-pointer. The ball gets stolen, and his team loses.
The three-point shot has ruined basketball.
Call it insanity, if you like, then, but I don't care for the insinuation that I have been anything other than consistent in my antipathy for the three-point shot.I had a longer response, but I'm gonna shorten it up: At this point, over 76% of all NBA games ever played and over 92% of NBA games played in your lifetime have used the three-point shot. You're apparently still watching.
Call it insanity, if you like, then, but I don't care for the insinuation that I have been anything other than consistent in my antipathy for the three-point shot.
The three-point shot has been around for most of my lifetime but, for at least the statistical majority of that time, it has been a fringe gimmick that I could tolerate. In the last decade or so, it has become a gimmick that has overrun the game I loved, and has reduced the aspect of the game that is most relevant to my interests (interior play) into the fringe. I fell in love with the game because of centers: guards don't interest me, most wings don't, either.