My idea:Bibby's trade

Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Hanks

Prospect
It's hard to say,but it's really time to trade Bibby.Kings couldn't make a new contract for Bibby after this season.Bibby is not Kings future,like Peja.The greatest moment has passed, Kings must face the fact.

Bibby for K.Brown A.Mckie J.Farmar

Brown 6-11 260 for PF(I don't care he only can dunk,Kings need power, force and hight)

Mckie (the last year, 2M)

Farmar(the future, with Martin Garcia Douby)
 
Hanks said:
It's hard to say,but it's really time to trade Bibby.Kings couldn't make a new contract for Bibby after this season.Bibby is not Kings future,like Peja.The greatest moment has passed, Kings must face the fact.

Bibby for K.Brown A.Mckie J.Farmar

Brown 6-11 260 for PF(I don't care he only can dunk,Kings need power, force and hight)

Mckie (the last year, 2M)

Farmar(the future, with Martin Garcia Douby)
Click to expand...



The team that gets the better player gets the better half of the trade... so on that note, this ones a big HELLLLLL NO!

Bibby in a Lakers Jersey?? :eek::eek::eek:
 
knowing what we know about bibby and his limits...i dont think it's a bad idea. It's not like we're trading away someone who's potential we dont understand. we know exactly what bibby is.
 
lakers are garbage the only reASON why they have a record over .500 is because they have 75% of their games at home they can keep their garbage talent, bibby for any laker is a bad trade, during bibby's playoffs years he has out-performed the opposing point guard, we can still build around bibby, all we need is a dominating pf, kwame brown will not fill this need and not certainly for mike bibby, if we could we should try to land kevin garnett, now thats a thought!
 
uptempo-kings said:
lakers are garbage the only reASON why they have a record over .500 is because they have 75% of their games at home they can keep their garbage talent, bibby for any laker is a bad trade, during bibby's playoffs years he has out-performed the opposing point guard, we can still build around bibby, all we need is a dominating pf, kwame brown will not fill this need and not certainly for mike bibby, if we could we should try to land kevin garnett, now thats a thought!
Click to expand...


That's the spirit!:D
 
horrible trade. i thought we were gunning for some talented young players? atlanta could definitely use a PG like bibby and should not have a problem giving up a draft pick for a proven PG.
 
A few thoughts

A few thoughts:

1 - Trading within the division is the most overrated excuse ever!

I hate this excuse with a passion. If the end goal is, as many people have said, "to win a championship," then you make the best trade possible." Then I don't care who it is worth. Would you rather we make the best team in our division better and be a contender in 3 years or make a trade to the Eastern Conference and still suck in 5 years. Now the trade would have to be amazing to be with the Lakers, as they are our rivals, but in general, I would make a trade to the Clippers or Suns if I thought it would help our long-term chances.
 
I am against any trades involving Mike Bibby. He loves it here, plays very well here and I am surprised that every time he goes into a slump (which most humans are guilty of this for various reasons) many fans are ready to bring him to the gallows.

Who is better that the Kings can realistically get?

Wait... I said REALISTICALLY!
 
Last edited:
Sptsjunkie said:
A few thoughts:

1 - Trading within the division is the most overrated excuse ever!

I hate this excuse with a passion. If the end goal is, as many people have said, "to win a championship," then you make the best trade possible." Then I don't care who it is worth. Would you rather we make the best team in our division better and be a contender in 3 years or make a trade to the Eastern Conference and still suck in 5 years. Now the trade would have to be amazing to be with the Lakers, as they are our rivals, but in general, I would make a trade to the Clippers or Suns if I thought it would help our long-term chances.
Click to expand...

Yep...sounds "objective" alright, BUT, Hating the lakers IS NOT objective! :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top