Mock draft 2026

Did you HAVE to remind me/us about this AGAIN??? :p

That doesn't bother me as much as them also F'ing up Bagley, lol. They had a legit 20 and 10 big sitting right there and ruined him. So what if it it was fools gold. They like usual stuck low level role guys in the path for no reason, none. They're doing the same things now with some guys (uh, Devin Carter), that tells me unless the Kings get a generational talent that's literally un-F uppable this is going to be a long, long drought haha. KANGZ.
 
That doesn't bother me as much as them also F'ing up Bagley, lol. They had a legit 20 and 10 big sitting right there and ruined him. They're doing the same things now with some guys, that tells me unless the Kings get a generational talent that's literally un-F uppable this is going to be a long, long drought haha. KANGZ.
The problem is that, as much as you may eventually think a future generational talent is "literally un-F-uppable", if the Kings end up with the guy, they will still find a way to screw it all up...:)
 
At this point in time I'm a soft no on Peterson. His talent is alluring. His attitude, maturity, competitiveness and non-availability are question marks that scare the hell out of me. To me he's got to show up bigtime in the NCAAs to get my vote. That means that I have to see an impact player from start to finish of the games; he can't "show up" in one game and not the other , nor just "show up" in the last few minutes of a game. Really, the only players I'm totally sold on are AJ and Caleb Wilson. Am I setting myself up for disappointment when the Kings don't get either one? . Probably. :D
Based on what I've heard elsewhere, and the bolded statement, not only do I agree with this but even if he shows out for the tournament, what does that say about him? That he can coast through the season and only turn up when it's suitable / important for him? How will that play on a team like the Kings? How long before he decides it isn't important to play for a team that loses a LOT of games?
 
Actually the Kings biggest flaws are when they go for fit, not talent. Hence Bagley over Luka. The Kings rarely get that top talent, when they did in Fox and Cuz they had 6-7 years to not F it up, then they did. Usually by trying to skip to step 4-5 instead of just riding the path for awhile.
It goes deeper than that. It goes to how one evaluates a player as BPA. In my world a player who is primarily offensive and brings very little if any defense is heavily discounted, whereas the player that is a two-way player gets a premium in his evaluation.
 
It goes deeper than that. It goes to how one evaluates a player as BPA. In my world a player who is primarily offensive and brings very little if any defense is heavily discounted, whereas the player that is a two-way player gets a premium in his evaluation.

You're also sort of defining for a player who very rarely even exists in the NBA draft. There simply are not a lot of genuine two-way talents at the top of most drafts. And when I say "genuine two-way talent", I mean a force on both ends of the court, able to bend a defense until it breaks and able to generate more possessions for his team by inducing regular stops. Those guys are just so hard to come by, and it's usually not obvious on draft day who they are. SGA and Kawhi are two of the league's premiere two-way talents. They went 11th and 15th, respectively. Few expected them to be powerhouses on both ends. Then there's the obvious ones, like Wemby, who's in a galaxy of his own as a player, and rarer a talent you will never find.

Honestly, any defensive skill is a good sign when you're looking at a potential offensive talent at the top of a given draft. Most of these guys hone those skills in the NBA anyway, and you hope they can become something more than liabilities on that end. I mean, Nikola Jokic is considered by many to be the greatest basketball player in the world today, and he's only passable as a defender. He's certainly not a two-way threat. Ditto Luka. Hell, Steph Curry and Steve Nash were defensive sieves for most of their careers, and even LeBron absolutely was not a two-way talent on draft day. That doesn't stop you from drafting those guys if you believe in the transformative power of their offensive ability.

Yes, if there's obvious and genuine two-way ability on display, you go with that guy. But, I mean, duh, right? Who doesn't take Wemby first overall? The point is, you're not going to see a lot of draftees with obvious and genuine two-way ability, so the rest is a bit of a crapshoot. Can you win the title with Luka? Debatable. But his offensive talent is transformative enough to keep you in the playoff conversation by virtue of his one-way ability, so in the absence of the obvious two-way threat, sometimes you draft the obvious one-way threat and hope it doesn't kill you on the defensive end.
 
You're also sort of defining for a player who very rarely even exists in the NBA draft. There simply are not a lot of genuine two-way talents at the top of most drafts. And when I say "genuine two-way talent", I mean a force on both ends of the court, able to bend a defense until it breaks and able to generate more possessions for his team by inducing regular stops. Those guys are just so hard to come by, and it's usually not obvious on draft day who they are. SGA and Kawhi are two of the league's premiere two-way talents. They went 11th and 15th, respectively. Few expected them to be powerhouses on both ends. Then there's the obvious ones, like Wemby, who's in a galaxy of his own as a player, and rarer a talent you will never find.

Honestly, any defensive skill is a good sign when you're looking at a potential offensive talent at the top of a given draft. Most of these guys hone those skills in the NBA anyway, and you hope they can become something more than liabilities on that end. I mean, Nikola Jokic is considered by many to be the greatest basketball player in the world today, and he's only passable as a defender. He's certainly not a two-way threat. Ditto Luka. Hell, Steph Curry and Steve Nash were defensive sieves for most of their careers, and even LeBron absolutely was not a two-way talent on draft day. That doesn't stop you from drafting those guys if you believe in the transformative power of their offensive ability.

Yes, if there's obvious and genuine two-way ability on display, you go with that guy. But, I mean, duh, right? Who doesn't take Wemby first overall? The point is, you're not going to see a lot of draftees with obvious and genuine two-way ability, so the rest is a bit of a crapshoot. Can you win the title with Luka? Debatable. But his offensive talent is transformative enough to keep you in the playoff conversation by virtue of his one-way ability, so in the absence of the obvious two-way threat, sometimes you draft the obvious one-way threat and hope it doesn't kill you on the defensive end.

I think a guy like Dybansta is intriguing because he can possibly be an Anthony Edwards type. A #1 on offense and might not be an all NBA defender but he's not going to be a guy you have to worry about on defense either.
 
Looking at the other end of the draft and our second round pick. This player could be very interesting

Motiejus Krivas (Arizona)​

29 of 60

Arizona v Arizona State

Chris Coduto/Getty Images
Position: C | Size: 7'2", 260 lbs | Age: 21 | Country: Lithuania
Pro Comp: Ivica Zubac
 
You're also sort of defining for a player who very rarely even exists in the NBA draft. There simply are not a lot of genuine two-way talents at the top of most drafts. And when I say "genuine two-way talent", I mean a force on both ends of the court, able to bend a defense until it breaks and able to generate more possessions for his team by inducing regular stops. Those guys are just so hard to come by, and it's usually not obvious on draft day who they are. SGA and Kawhi are two of the league's premiere two-way talents. They went 11th and 15th, respectively. Few expected them to be powerhouses on both ends. Then there's the obvious ones, like Wemby, who's in a galaxy of his own as a player, and rarer a talent you will never find.

Honestly, any defensive skill is a good sign when you're looking at a potential offensive talent at the top of a given draft. Most of these guys hone those skills in the NBA anyway, and you hope they can become something more than liabilities on that end. I mean, Nikola Jokic is considered by many to be the greatest basketball player in the world today, and he's only passable as a defender. He's certainly not a two-way threat. Ditto Luka. Hell, Steph Curry and Steve Nash were defensive sieves for most of their careers, and even LeBron absolutely was not a two-way talent on draft day. That doesn't stop you from drafting those guys if you believe in the transformative power of their offensive ability.

Yes, if there's obvious and genuine two-way ability on display, you go with that guy. But, I mean, duh, right? Who doesn't take Wemby first overall? The point is, you're not going to see a lot of draftees with obvious and genuine two-way ability, so the rest is a bit of a crapshoot. Can you win the title with Luka? Debatable. But his offensive talent is transformative enough to keep you in the playoff conversation by virtue of his one-way ability, so in the absence of the obvious two-way threat, sometimes you draft the obvious one-way threat and hope it doesn't kill you on the defensive end.

It's also discounting that 98% of rookies are god awful at defense their first couple years. It's very rare to see a Herb Jones or even what Dylan Cardwell did this year from a young player. Wemby is the extreme outlier of course. Even premier defensive talents like a SGA and Kawhi grew into their stopper role.
 
Looking at the other end of the draft and our second round pick. This player could be very interesting

Motiejus Krivas (Arizona)​

29 of 60

Arizona v Arizona State

Chris Coduto/Getty Images
Position: C | Size: 7'2", 260 lbs | Age: 21 | Country: Lithuania
Pro Comp: Ivica Zubac
Tankathon currently has him mocked to go at pick 50. Do you think he will be able to help his stock enough to bump him up towards the earlier part of the 2nd round, when the Kings are projected to pick, or are you hoping that they find a way to trade into an extra 2nd round pick in order to grab him?
 
Someone I wouldn't mind seeing the Kings look into with one of their 2nd round picks is Milos Uzan (Houston). He's had a solid college run in Houston. I wonder if he could be someone worth looking into for the Kings.
 
Back
Top