I'd like to buy this narrative, but Vlade doesn't play poker. He's not a smokescreen guy. A disinformation campaign is frankly too sophisticated for him. I also contend the assertion Luka is the easy obvious choice. Based on what, conventional sentiment? Conventional thinking is usually wrong. Making a decision based on a consensus is rooted in fear, being able to absolve yourself of responsibility when the decision goes awry. So you can say, well, "Luka was the popular choice at the time, so don't blame me for taking him". This does not mean you automatically become a contrarian. But the decision needs to be made independent over the mock drafts and fan declarations. The other thing is this: Vlade is prideful over Fox and Boggy. These are two guys he got right amidst a bunch of decisions that turned out wrong. He wants to add to this. He wants to complement. Luka has overlapping skills. It is in this regard, in addition to questions about perimeter shot and athleticism, the decision to Luka becomes far less cut and dry. This is partly why I think the Kings will end up taking Bagley. Ultimately I believe there is enough sensibility and self-preservation motives in the "war room" to take a guy who checks most of the boxes.