Matt Barnes: Swingman hopes career path leads back home

gotpitbull

G-League
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/12906045p-13754497c.html
By Joe Davidson, Bee Staff Writer

Sometimes, change is good. For Matt Barnes, however, his relocation from a perfectly comfortable Kings setting was a colossal headache and disaster.

When Barnes was shipped to the Philadelphia 76ers as part of the Chris Webber package Feb. 23, it didn't just revamp the Kings' roster. The deal derailed what had been a productive season for Barnes, who made nine starts for his hometown team.


In Philly, he never played again. The swingman from Del Campo High School and UCLA suited up for the first two games as a 76er, then was stashed on the injured list for the remainder of the season with, well, he's not sure, exactly.

The reason was listed as knee tendinitis, only there was a problem with that diagnosis.

"I've never had any problems with my knee in my life," Barnes said Monday afternoon. "I found out what kind of business this really is. I thought they had plans for me. It was the most hurt I've ever been in this sport. I didn't play a second and had to watch a team I know I could have helped."

Now, Barnes is back in Sacramento, working out daily at Basketball Town in Rancho Cordova, hoping for a call from an NBA team in need of a long, lean, 6-foot-7 rebounder and defender. He's a free agent.

Barnes said the Kings have expressed interest, much to his excitement. But isn't there any bitterness?

"No way," Barnes said. "I know it's a business. I'd love to come back to the Kings. I really would."

Barnes isn't short of motivation. He wrote reminders - "Remember how it felt to watch the playoffs" - and stashed the notes throughout his Folsom home.

And Barnes proved to be good to his word upon his Sacramento return.

He had committed to an area fund-raiser before his trade and afterward promised he'd come through at a later date. Sure enough, he was at St. Mel's School in Fair Oaks last week, working with hordes of 10-year-olds who were part of the Pennies for Patients fund-raiser. Barnes later accepted an award from the Sacramento Chapter of the Leukemia-Lymphoma Chapter for his help.

"Matt was just incredible," said Mary Kidd-Gonzales, co-chair for the fund-raiser. "He faithfully said he'd come back and did."

Barnes said the only good to come from the 76ers experience was bonding with Webber, who endured his own tough go in his new surroundings. They hung out, dined together, complained to each other. And they're vacationing in Jamaica this weekend with other friends.

"We became like brothers," Barnes said.

In an effort to receive another opportunity with the Kings, Barnes is retooling his game. He's using Webber's shooting coach, Buzz Braman, who has made a living helping people shoot straight.

Barnes has always had something of an unorthodox shooting form, with his left hand placed almost directly in front of the ball. It didn't hurt him in high school, and he managed as a four-year starter at UCLA. However, his shooting has been a concern in the NBA.

"The knock on me is that I can't shoot," Barnes said. "My mechanics weren't very good. It's hard to change after 20 years shooting this way, like trying to learn to walk again. Maybe it's a blessing in disguise."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
attached pic

140-matt.jpg



Matt Barnes suited up for the Philadelphia 76ers in two games, but he didn't play.
Sacramento Bee/Bryan Patrick
 
Londonking said:
I too hope things work out for him, but i cant really see him being part of our starting lineup.

Oh certainly not a starter, unless we completely fall apart. But I think he was, and could be again, a useful deep bencher for us. Given that he's a young guy with some skill, woudl come cheap, plays multiple positions, does some of the things we need more of, is familiar with the system, likes the team/system/coach and WANTS to play in Sacto, not really sure why the Kings wouldn't give him another shot...unless of course we decide to keep our entire roster of overpriced middling nobodies and just don't have room.

Guys like Matt are what allow the best teams to concentrate their talent and salaries in their top players. Cheap, young, with some skill and the ability to play a role. Much better than our current pay-the-mediocre-10th-man-$5mil structure.
 
Last edited:
Based on the medical history of Sacramento Kings over the past five years, I would have to assume that any healthy swing-man on the Kings' bench would probably get serious minutes.
 
Exactly! He's probably thinking "On any other team, I'll be a bench player who will never get minutes. But on the Kings.....I can start half the season due to the other guys injuries!" Seriously though, what a cool guy. I really hope things work out for him, if not here, then wherever he ends up.
 
Matt Barnes, come on down! This is one Kings fan who would absolutely love to see you back in a Kings uniform. These kinds of players don't come along too often; a hometown hero would do a lot, IMHO, to restore some of the local enthusiasm about the team. I think we need Matt as much as Matt needs us and I certainly hope Petrie can find a way to bring him back into the fold. I don't think Philly would bother matching an offer for him - considering they have free agents like Kyle Korver to worry about.

BRING BACK MATT!!!!!
 
i would love to see matt come back. he's a die hard kings fan, he's cheap, and i liked him last year, so BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!!
 
Barnsie is a great kid with a good heart who loves the Kings. He hustles, he is determined to improve, and he will not be expensive. There is no reason for him not to be back.
 
that sucks, i didnt know he was not playing because of a made up injury. the guy was fun to watch, especially when he was inbounding passes off of another player to himself. besides that, he has what we need...................HEART and DETERMINATION.
 
VF21 said:
Matt Barnes, come on down! This is one Kings fan who would absolutely love to see you back in a Kings uniform. These kinds of players don't come along too often; a hometown hero would do a lot, IMHO, to restore some of the local enthusiasm about the team. I think we need Matt as much as Matt needs us and I certainly hope Petrie can find a way to bring him back into the fold. I don't think Philly would bother matching an offer for him - considering they have free agents like Kyle Korver to worry about.

BRING BACK MATT!!!!!
WORD! I would love to see him back too! I propose we start a "Bring Back Matt!" campaign....
 
Barnes is technically a restricted free agent, isn't he? There isn't a chance that Philadelphia will re-sign him, is there? I mean, everybody here is talking about getting Barnes back "on the cheap," but if he comes too cheap, who's to say that Philadelphia wouldn't just match the offer and stuff him back on the end of their bench?
 
thesanityannex said:
that sucks, i didnt know he was not playing because of a made up injury. the guy was fun to watch, especially when he was inbounding passes off of another player to himself. besides that, he has what we need...................HEART and DETERMINATION.

Philadelphia only took him to make the numbers work. His "knee tendinitis" is a pretty common way for teams to park guys on the injured list.

Mr. S£im Citrus said:
Barnes is technically a restricted free agent, isn't he? There isn't a chance that Philadelphia will re-sign him, is there? I mean, everybody here is talking about getting Barnes back "on the cheap," but if he comes too cheap, who's to say that Philadelphia wouldn't just match the offer and stuff him back on the end of their bench?

Philadelphia has some "real player" free agents they're going to have to worry about, including Kyle Korver. I seriously doubt if they would bother to match any kind of offer we might make to Barnes.
 
I don't share your optimism, VF; after what transpired with our own team this past season, I don't put anything past anybody. And besides, letting us sign Barnes to a "bargain basement" offer sheet and then matching it, whether they ever plan to play him or not, wouldn't be the dumbest thing Philadelphia could do...
 
I don't share your unrelenting pessimism, Slim. Bottom line is we don't know, of course, what will happen but I see no problem at all in hoping for something good. Certainly the Sixers could match a low offer sheet, but we certainly won't know if we don't even try.

It doesn't cost anything to make the offer, IMHO, and I think we could do a lot worse than to bring Matt Barnes back. If the Sixers match the offer, then at least we tried.
 
My "pessimism" is not unrelenting, VF... it's not really even pessimism. I'm not an optimistic person, because of my nature, but lack of optimism =/= the opposite of optimism.*

And I never said that we shouldn't make Barnes an offer; I'm just saying that there is a legitimate risk in offering a restricted free agent "too little" money. If I were GM, I'd put out feelers to find out what Philadelphia's "bottom line" is; find out what is the absolute most amount of money they'd be willing to pay to keep him, and then maybe offer him five percent more.








* - =/= means "is not equal to."
 
Last edited:
What exactly are we discussing? I'm saying we should make an offer to Philly. I didn't say "bargain basement." What I said was I doubted Philly would match any kind of offer to him because they have bigger fish to worry about.

You're thinking way deeper than I was about this whole thing. I tend to leave details like that to Petrie - he gets paid a lot more than I do for those kinds of things.

All I said was I think we should try to get him back. Instead of saying something like "I agree, but I think we have to be careful how much or how little we offer because..." you came back with comments I took to be pretty negative in tone and content. Almost like "Well, it doesn't matter because Philly will match our offer just to spite us."

There's always a risk in offering a restricted free agent a contract. I think Petrie probably knows what he's doing.

Sorry if I've misunderstood.
 
VF21 said:
You're thinking way deeper than I was about this whole thing. I tend to leave details like that to Petrie - he gets paid a lot more than I do for those kinds of things.
Well now, that is something that you could say I'm pessimistic about; I haven't had that kind of faith in Petrie since February 23rd, so I don't give him the benefit of the doubt any more.

VF21 said:
All I said was I think we should try to get him back. Instead of saying something like "I agree, but I think we have to be careful how much or how little we offer because..." you came back with comments I took to be pretty negative in tone and content. Almost like "Well, it doesn't matter because Philly will match our offer just to spite us."
So, your comments are a critque on my posting style? :confused:
 
KKSloga said:
Why again do we need Matt Barnes??

Quite a few reasons, actually. He has proven to be more than capable at providing good bench energy, which we lacked from time to time last season. He has the potential to be a good rebounder and defender, again things we lacked last season. Barnes is a good team player and adds to good team morale and unity - again missing from our team at the end. He also was/ is player that fans love and rally around. That might not make our dream of a championship more of a reality, but since fan support appeared to be down, we could most assuredly use that!

I say, "BRING MATT BACK!"
 
Mr. S£im Citrus said:
Well now, that is something that you could say I'm pessimistic about; I haven't had that kind of faith in Petrie since February 23rd, so I don't give him the benefit of the doubt any more.

So, your comments are a critque on my posting style? :confused:

No more than yours are of mine.

Not a critique. More of an attempt at an explanation of why I jumped right off Conclusion Cliff and into Assumption Pond. Had you prefaced your comments in the manner I indicated above, I might not have made the leap. Then again, I still might have.

The thread had being traveling down a nice little path - pretty much everyone saying we should get Matt back if possible. Your comments were just enough out of that path that I got sidetracked. ;)

No harm, no foul.

KKSloga said:
Why again do we need Matt Barnes??

Have you read the comments? It's about a lot of things - he's an excellent role player, which every team needs. He's a hometown boy whose lifelong dream has been to play for the Kings, which makes him a crowd favorite. He's got skills and he's working hard to improve them. He's not expensive. Why wouldn't we want him? Someone needs to fill those role player roster slots and I think we could do a lot worse than someone like Matt.
 
CaminoChaos said:
didn't he win a couple games for us with some key plays at the end of the game.

I don't think it's about whether or not he won a couple of games. I think there's a lot more to it. Keon Clark arguably won a couple of games but I certainly wouldn't be in favor of bringing him back...

IMHO this is just one of the times when you do something because it just seems like the right thing to do. In a business like the NBA, a hometown favorite can be a big asset. If he can help bring - in any way - some of the disgruntled fans back into the fold, then it's all good. And besides that? He's a personable young man who follows the trend of Kings players wanting to work in the community. He can serve as a positive role model because he appears to have his head on straight as far as realistic expectations go. He just seems to me to be worth the effort to bring back.
 
Money. They had to match the salaries. Hence we gave up Bradley and Barnes, not because the Sixers wanted them, but because their salaries would make the whole deal work.
 
VF21 said:
Money. They had to match the salaries. Hence we gave up Bradley and Barnes, not because the Sixers wanted them, but because their salaries would make the whole deal work.

That is the reason I think they would let him go - he never played a minute for them and sat because of a "phantom" injury - I don't think they are going to go all out to match offers for a guy they really didn't seem to want in the first place (except for filler to get Webber)....
 
Back
Top