Thoughts on if we should pursue him i bealive he is a RFA this year.
Jimmer for a extended DJ straight up.
The whole point to getting a good passer is having someone with him that can shoot the ball after the passer finds the open man..
Evans is not that type of player. We would have Augustin passing Evans the ball and then what? Evans will just hold the ball and play one on one like he always does.
On the other hand putting Thorton with Augustin would net you a tiny back court but one that would work a lot better than DJ and Tyreke.
If we were going to make a play for a pass first PG we would need cutters, and pick and pop players. Evans, and Salmons do not bit that role. So Evans, and Salmons would have to go... The good thing with that is that you would have to throw Salmons in with an Evans trade in order to get salaries to match for a decent player who's getting 10+mil a year (unless we absorbed salary being under the cap).
So if this team was mine, and I knew we were going to Get Augustin, then I would be looking at moving Evans/Salmons in a package to get a shooting small forward like Granger, or a center like Hibbert. I might even try to make a play for Curry as well or Harden. Guys like Rudy Gay are guys I wouldn't look for with a pure PG because they tend to hold the ball and try to create and drive to the basket. DeRozan has a nice looking shot this year, and Wes Johnson has a sweet stroke but before making a play for Johnson I would want to make sure that he can play well with a pure PG and Rubio is about as pure as they come.
People have this odd fascination with pass first PGs that would make them give up all the talent in the world to get one, despite almost no correlation between having one and winning games whatsoever. You don't force a Tyreke Evcans out so you can acquire a DJ Augustin, who until a couple of hot games was in danger of bieng benched on his own near worst in the league team. You just don't. As in ever. Unless you're Joe Axelson.
Give up all the talent in the world??? We are talking about the Kings backcourt okay. This roster is put together so poorly made up mostly of guards who have trouble facilitating an offense especially down the stretch. Kings will continue to lose close games like yesterday where it was there for the taking until a true point is acquired. 21 and 4 are not walking threw those doors anymore, peace.
Yes we are talking about the Kings backcourt. One of the most talented starting duos in the league. And we are talking about DJ Augustin, who turns 25 this year, and who's very best season thus far has been 14pts 6ast on .416 shooting.
As an aside, #21 and #4 were veteran players playing for their thrid teams by the team we got them. All of the knee jerkers around here would have us be the foolish teams that gave them up in the first place.
Most talented back court? Who cares.. I would rather have a PG who makes the team better than two chuckers in there where one of them holds the ball for half the shot clock.. You want to know why Salmons is sucking so bad this year? Because there isn't enough time on the shot-clock for both Evans and Salmons to hold onto the ball. I have been saying this since we drafted Evans.. Evans is not a PG. I don't care how talented the back court is INDIVIDUALLY, together they play like an average back court at best. I would rather have a PG that makes the team better and a SG that can hit open shots than what we have now.
Individual talent =/= teams being good. Right now we have 5 individuals on the floor and the only guys I see that's trying to get others involved are a rookie, and the last guy on the bench.. It's pretty sad.
lol suuure.. I have season tickets. I watch them in person every game.. They are (so far) not really playing like a team out there.. If you say any different then you are the one who obviously hasn't watched them.
No. IT can do what he does eventually, and IT is quicker.