Lieberman exiled by Karl?????

Status
Not open for further replies.
Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave 23m23 minutes ago
Check the top paragraph from @sam_amick.

"Nancy Lieberman long ago labeled a Ranadive confidante and thus unofficially exiled by Karl months ago."

Full article

Above quote in context:

The wildly talented Cousins is a lot of things, but he’s no dummy. He sees the justifiable criticism of Ranadive, whose refusal to stand by the only NBA coach who truly connected with Cousins, Michael Malone, in Dec. 2014 was one of the many plot twists that helped cause this mess. He sees the in-fighting on the coaching staff, with assistant coach Nancy Lieberman long ago labeled a Ranadive confidante and thus unofficially exiled by Karl months ago.
 
Last edited:
Just heard this on Napear show. He read a few different paragraphs from the Amick piece which is on the Cuz situation.
 
Interesting how Sam just tucked that little nugget of info in there right at the end of the article like it was common knowledge. I wonder if Ailene still thinks George Karl has got a chance at a front office job with the Kings after this.
Puck Ailene. She should be replaced by Aaron Bruski in my honest opinion.
 
I do wonder a little bit though.

Remember the Karl assistant that got canned at the deadline? Mr. Dribble Drive?

Well it was reported that he and Nancy were not on good terms, and that may even have mattered a bit in his dismissal (rumored he and some players not on great terms either).

Also remember that Nancy only got the job because of George Karl -- he was the friend/connection.

Amick's blurb could be true, but I wonder a bit about a misinterpretation.
 
The one thing I have noticed in games is that Rondo and DeMarcus talk a LOT with Nancy. Isit even possible for my regard of Karl to sink even lower?

You and I were talking about this quite recently. I've noticed WCS and Omri also talking with Nancy, along with Vlade.

I am angry, and it's not because of my gender. It's because this is more proof that George Karl isn't willing to get with the program and accept that things are changing. Nancy has reached out to the Sacramento community and she and several Kings have worked with or are working with local charities for the good of kids, etc. That's important. To relegate her to second class status because Karl thinks she's a "Ranadive confidante" is very telling...and gives proof to the rumors that Vlade and Vivek wanted to fire Karl but were talked out of it by the minority ownership.

This team is still a trainwreck, and it looks like a bridge or six might have also collapsed.

This can't be real...but it is. And Kings fans just continue to sit on the sidelines with their boxes of popcorn. What a long strange trip it's been.
 
The one thing I have noticed in games is that Rondo and DeMarcus talk a LOT with Nancy. Isit even possible for my regard of Karl to sink even lower?

She is close to both of them. She even mentioned in an interview earlier this year how Rondo would regularly call or text her in the middle of the night because he thought of something (or saw something watching game film).
 
This could be much ado about nothing.

Or the treatment of Nancy could very well be one of this season's major distractions that hurt the team.

That one paragraph doesn't hold the answer.
 
This could be much ado about nothing.

Or the treatment of Nancy could very well be one of this season's major distractions that hurt the team.

That one paragraph doesn't hold the answer.

What bothers me is that I had been talking about the apparent demotion of Lieberman for a couple of weeks among friends. I tend to believe Amick in this because I don't think he'd put something with that much potential for reaction out there without pretty strong sources.

I believe beyond all shadow of a doubt that George Karl is trying his best to get himself fired. If this is true, things could get even more bizarre in the remaining days of our season. Things never before seen in the NBA? Not at all out of the realm of possibility in Kings land. ;)
 
I believe she was marginalized in some way. And I doubt that sits well with some of the players.

What I'm saying is that the details of why, when, who was involved, etc just isn't there. Was that other let go assistant involved? I'm guessing yes, in some way.

As an aside, always thought it a bit of a classless move to make her sit behind the bench.
 
Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave 23m23 minutes ago
Check the top paragraph from @sam_amick.

"Nancy Lieberman long ago labeled a Ranadive confidante and thus unofficially exiled by Karl months ago."

Full article

Above quote in context:

This seemed evident quite awhile ago. Nancy acts like a secretary in taking notes. I know that is not unusual. She also never represents the team at half time; not even to regurgitate the party line that the team needs to improve it's pace. Her job was not clear on game day.

Any bets on which coach comes back next year?
 
Ok so let me try to get everything in order

A) Vivek and Karl don't get along, Karl was a PDA hire
B) Vivek wanted Karl fired at all star break but was overthrown by minority owners
C) Vivek is close with Nancy, Nancy is put in Karl's doghouse
D) Didn't Karl advocate for Nancy?
E) Has Nancy been the voice of the players to Vivek in regards to negativity about Karl?
F) This crap is a huge mess, and I don't what to believe other than Karl is gone.
 
Let's air some more dirty laundry. You think this is the only organization that has any to air? It's just another sign the organazation is not run well. Any other NBA teams with so many rumors and faction fighting over stuff like this? It's amatuer hour.
 
We don't have all the facts, but Nancy can't undermine the head coach like that. It sounds like this has happened, but obviously we don't know all the facts. The dysfunction is showing from the top down.
 
The report is that George Karl "exiled" one of his own assistant coaches because she gets along too well with the owner of the team. What exactly "exiled" means in this context is up for interpretation but I would have to assume it means communication between the two is either strained or non-existent. Where in any of that could someone come to the conclusion that Nancy Lieberman has done something wrong?
 
Nancy was brought on board by Karl so if she is chumming up with Vivek it creates an awkward dynamic if she is confiding to Karl's boss...likely saying things to Vivek that don't place Karl in the most flattering light. I am sure her opinions on how the team she be run differ from what she has witnessed.

It is irrelevant anyway because Karl has zero chance of being retained.
 
The report is that George Karl "exiled" one of his own assistant coaches because she gets along too well with the owner of the team. What exactly "exiled" means in this context is up for interpretation but I would have to assume it means communication between the two is either strained or non-existent. Where in any of that could someone come to the conclusion that Nancy Lieberman has done something wrong?
The term was "unofficially exiled" which I take to mean she's assistant in name only and her falling out with Karl has reduced (eliminated) her influence.
 
Nancy was brought on board by Karl so if she is chumming up with Vivek it creates an awkward dynamic if she is confiding to Karl's boss...likely saying things to Vivek that don't place Karl in the most flattering light. I am sure her opinions on how the team she be run differ from what she has witnessed.

It is irrelevant anyway because Karl has zero chance of being retained.

This is a very colored reading of what was actually reported. When is it ever seen as a negative to have a friendly working relationship with your boss? There's nothing in the report that says she was leaking privileged information to Vivek (whatever that even means -- he's the owner of the team, what is he not supposed to know about his coaching staff?) or that she was spreading slander. If that's what you got out of this than you brought that interpretation yourself because it's not in the article. Not to mention -- if my boss's boss asks me for my opinion about something am I supposed to lie about it to make my boss look better? You have to work really hard to turn this into a negative reflection of Nancy Lieberman's character.

This could be some of what DeMarcus was referring to when he mentioned recently in one of his post-game interviews that there were distractions off the court that involved in-fighting between people who are supposed to be on the same side. I wasn't sure what those comments were referring to at the time. I don't have any information about this other than the one line in Sam Amick's article but to have anyone who works for you "unofficially exiled" rather than outright fired or engaged in a dialog of some kind that intends to fix the cause of the friction strikes me as childish and unnecessary. This is not something that happens in healthy organizations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top