Until this season the Giants hadn’t been doing much winning the past 6 years. Unless you consider finishing 15-20 games back “winning”. You’re taking a big leap in connecting 20 years together as a whole.
Furthermore, correlating whatever success they’d had to the reason you just laid out is faulty. Following that playbook in no way ensures winning for anyone.
The biggest and common reason for success is acquiring and developing good players. Something the Giants have done better than the KINGS. That’s why they’ve done more winning. Not because of the factor you’re citing.
In the past 20 years, the Giants went to the World Series and lost during the Bonds/Dusty era. Went through a few years of rebuilding then went to and won three World Series during the Bochey/Timme/Buster era. Now after a few years of rebuilding, they’ve revamped their entire leadership team, acquired a boat load of new players, and have the best r3cord in the league.
During those periods, they won by building around Bonds and purposely destroying their minor league teams to save money and sign aging free agents. Then during the Timme era, they hit on a few pitchers and a generational catcher and built around pitching and defense. Now it’s all analytics and churning. Three completely different ways to win.
Yet during that time, the ownership group was the same, they hired, kept, and memorialized former members like Mays, McCovey, Will Clark, Jt Snow…acquired an ownership stake in CSN Bay Area, developed the land around ATT park…while earning a rep for being one of the best franchises in the league.
So, no, they didn’t win because of acquiring and developing. They won because of the culture that they built.