I would have bet money that we couldn't get up seven with our two best players on the bench.
Smart lucked out. Sometimes we play well despite the coach. he should take IT our for dinner.
Smart lucked out. Sometimes we play well despite the coach. he should take IT our for dinner.
I'm sorry but I think you're being totally unfair to Smart. Criticize him when he does wrong but at least be big enough to recognize the good things, too.
I point out the good things he does all the time. Tonight, he lucked out with his substitutions.
I don't give a ****; sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.
EDIT - I wish we could be that lucky all the time...
He lucked out? Sorry, but we'll just have to agree to disagree because I think he adapted to the game on the court...and it worked. Peace out.
It was a good win. Happy for the guys.
Doesn't me[sic] I'll ignore the s*** substitutions by Smart which have plagued him since taking over.
It worked out tonight due to IT's play, but this is a ongoing problem with Smart. He will stick with groups until they force his hand and he is slow to recognize mismatches. You guys watch this team every night, do any of you really feel that Smart does a good job with the rotation?
As you like it. Some people are never satisfied. I waiting to see who is the first one to pop up and say this proves we don't need Evans...
As you like it. Some people are never satisfied. I waiting to see who is the first one to pop up and say this proves we don't need Evans...
As you like it. Some people are never satisfied. I waiting to see who is the first one to pop up and say this proves we don't need Evans...
Don't see how they can make that argument. Without Reke, we'd have come into the 2nd half down by at least twenty
That's completely different and you know it. Reke bashers are Reke bashers, and rarely if ever say anything positive about him. On multiple occasions I've pointed out how great a teacher Smart is and how great he is handling various personalities.
I've also pointed out his poor substitutions, and am not close to being the only one who has noticed. Guys played well tonight, and I did say it was a good win, did I not? Never satisfied? Please.
didn't see the game, but is there a reason tyreke only played 25 mins. did he get injured?
Well, I wasn't actually talking about you, specifically. But, my policy is always, if you took offense, you were probably supposed to...
The short answer is that I don't think he does a great job, but I also wouldn't call it horrible.
The long answer is that our team doesn't fit. The pieces don't work like a regular team's pieces would work. We have undersized players, over sized players .. no starting caliber SF .. too much money riding the bench (cisco/salmons/hayes) a rookie we don't want to lose completely if he doesn't work out of his slump (Jimmer) and two young guys who should see some minutes at some point (Honeycutt and Whiteside). It is NOT an easy team to manage rotation wise. I think if this team was built with better structure he wouldn't have much of a problem.
I think he made his big power play with Cousins, though. He has smartly joined himself at the hip with Cuz, making it virtually impossible to fire him if he does a decent job (and he has) .. We don't want to pee off and lose Cuz now that he's playing so well. Letting Smart go would irk Cousins big time.
Well, as I just said, I didn't say it to offend you. I said it to offend the people who would take offense to it. If it didn't offend you, by all means, feel free to move on.If you think I was supposed to take offense to that......as an MOD you really aren't that clear on my post history.....
didn't see the game, but is there a reason tyreke only played 25 mins. did he get injured?