parker
Bench
Did the extended rotation help them finish? Giving Fox 4th quarter rest? Doug loves him some Davion.They picked it up big in the 4th.
Did the extended rotation help them finish? Giving Fox 4th quarter rest? Doug loves him some Davion.They picked it up big in the 4th.
DC is the first guy to buy into Montes plan. F'd up on that call? haha.
It's not factually false. Why does "win at every level" have to equal championships? Because you decided? If he's never had a losing record before getting to Sacramento, then what level has he lost at?
It's not factually false. Why does "win at every level" have to equal championships? Because you decided? If he's never had a losing record before getting to Sacramento, then what level has he lost at?
Correct me if I’m wrong. Doug Christie is also the only undefeated kings coach in history.DOUG CHRISTIE HAS THE HIGHEST WINNING PERCENTAGE IN KINGS COACH HISTORY!
yeah, so much of that 4th quarter run came with Davion really pressing on the point of attack and disrupting the flow of the Wizards' offense.But, nonetheless, a great bounce back effort from all. You can't tell me these guys were putting the same effort, especially on defense in this game as they were in the Cavs and Raptors game.
More Davion in the starting 5. His best tool is his ball pressure which should is more aptly used against the best starting back-court player. Just helps set a great defensive tone.
Indeed. In "win at every level" = championships and only championships, then the overwhelming majority of players of all sports, every level, are "losers." Is that really the logic we wanna go with?
If every Nba player has been on mostly winning teams prior to their NBA careers, what relevance does that have? None.
When someone says he’s won at every level, it always applies to someone like Davion, who has won championships at every level. That’s material info.
Kentucky made it to the elite 8 and lost to eventual champs UNC (led by winner at every level Justin Jackson) Fox's year though.Kentucky in particular is one of the last programs I’d associate with winning. It’s where blue chip lotto bound guys hang out for a year waiting for their name to be called while getting bounced early in the tourney
Kentucky in particular is one of the last programs I’d associate with winning. It’s where blue chip lotto bound guys hang out for a year waiting for their name to be called while getting bounced early in the tourney
Kentucky made it to the elite 8 and lost to eventual champs UNC (led by winner at every level Justin Jackson) Fox's year though.
But only four assists! #NotaPointGuard #NotaWinner #TradeFoxForASecondRoundPick31 points in 28 minutes for Fox. Seems like there's always some random conversation or distraction to take away from his good games
good win kangz. Grizzlies game will be an interesting one, kangz typically fall apart against tough squads
But only four assists! #NotaPointGuard #NotaWinner #TradeFoxForASecondRoundPick
Don't change the argument, now. Fox had never played on a team with a losing record, until getting to Sacramento. Therefore, he's not a loser. If you want to create new vocabulary to describe an athlete who's not a loser, but didn't win a championship, that's your burden. But shifting the argument from "not factually accurate" to factually accurate but "not relevant" is transparent.If every Nba player has been on mostly winning teams prior to their NBA careers, what relevance does that have? None.
Last time I checked, I am also "someone."When someone says he’s won at every level, it always applies to someone like Davion, who has won championships at every level.
What Davion brings to the court is valuable to any basketball team - defense, hustle, toughness, and smarts. He is impactful as a rookie and will only get better.
He should pattern his offensive game like Fred Van Vleet. That’s his offensive ceiling. Add that with his defense and the Kings got a top PG on their hands.
Don't change the argument, now. Fox had never played on a team with a losing record, until getting to Sacramento. Therefore, he's not a loser. If you want to create new vocabulary to describe an athlete who's not a loser, but didn't win a championship, that's your burden. But shifting the argument from "not factually accurate" to factually accurate but "not relevant" is transparent.
And, incidentally, winning an SEC championship, and SEC Tournament MVP award is not irrelevant.
Last time I checked, I am also "someone."