What are you talking about? Did you forget the game that Bagley played against Bam? It wasn't this zero inside presence we see in this game, that's for darned sure.
Bagley doesn’t even need to be brought into this argument to prove the awful minute allocation to Giles. It’s downright bizarre. They have to be thinking they’re being “smart” by “hiding” him from the league at this point.
Bagley doesn’t even need to be brought into this argument to prove the awful minute allocation to Giles. It’s downright bizarre. They have to be thinking they’re being “smart” by “hiding” him from the league at this point.
Remember that he fell on his shoulder during his stint and got up a bit tender. It's possible he's a bit injured. (And with this team...maybe a bit more than possible.)
Na. There’s no excuse not to play him when he’s playing well & with no foul trouble. I know I wear the Giles goggles harder than the Kings goggles at this point, but I’m not buying it that. There’s no reason he shouldn’t have been out there
Remember that he fell on his shoulder during his stint and got up a bit tender. It's possible he's a bit injured. (And with this team...maybe a bit more than possible.)
Na. There’s no excuse not to play him when he’s playing well & with no foul trouble. I know I wear the Giles goggles harder than the Kings goggles at this point, but I’m not buying it that. There’s no reason he shouldn’t have been out there