I'd happily do Evans for Vasquez, Bogut, and Barnes.
And I'd love a vegetarian sandwich made out of pure bacon.
Why exactly are the Warriors giving us Bogut and Barnes for free again?
I'd happily do Evans for Vasquez, Bogut, and Barnes.
The news just keeps getting worse and worse....
yeah we realize that. only problem is you mention 1 person. Its cuz team. BUT Lakers, heat, Thunder, boston, Spurs. all the elite team don't just have that 1 player with role players around them. they have 2-3 stars. without Tyreke baring a Maclemore explosion (which very well may happen) we have 1 star.
Been seeing a lot of goodbyes and we'll miss you guys sorta thing. Looks like there already moving on
do you mind posting up link for that. As i do not follow them
It's only July 4. And you have to start somewhere. If PDA's approach is to build around Cousins, then Vasquez actually makes sense. Those elite teams didn't come together in a big bang. They were built, just like our team back in the day. This ain't for the faint of heart. It's gonna be a helluva ride this summer. I'm gonna hold on and enjoy every second. At least we've got things to talk about, unlike prior years when draft day pretty much signaled the end of the Kings involvement in the off-season.
do you mind posting up link for that. As i do not follow them
Yes Tyreke Evans can get to the basket and yes he can put up some decent numbers (on bad teams) but guys like him are essentially a dime-a-dozen. They don't help you win.
Jason Quick @jwquick about 10 minutes agoAmick just Tweeted that He heard that Lopez may be going to Portland in the deal. He doesn't know who Portland would be giving up in the deal.
its the same news
You fit your roleplayers around your stars, but stars are too rare and unique to get too picky about.
Overreact much?This was bad when we were getting Lopez, it's downright ridiculous if we're giving up Reke for Vazquez. This is how losing franchises stay losers.
I'm not forgetting. Defense is another area where Tyreke is slightly overrated. Yes Tyreke is a good defender but he's not a great defender. Maybe in a great defensive system, Tyrekes defense continues to improve to the point of being great but at least the last few years he has not been a great game-changing type defender. How do I know that? Simple, the Kings defense has been pathetic the last few years and defenders that are true "difference makers" don't play on teams that are dead-last in defense.
Speaking of defense, this teams defense doesn't go anywhere as a unit until DeMarcus Cousins decides to start playing some defense.
It's not Reke for Vasquez... it's Reke for Vasquez plus about $9mil in cap space. That money will be spent... wait and see what it's spent on before deciding.This was bad when we were getting Lopez, it's downright ridiculous if we're giving up Reke for Vazquez. This is how losing franchises stay losers.
I think this might be a signal the FO wants to start completely fresh. Lose DMC in a season because he won't stay on a bad team, and start hoping for the lottery again so we can get a couple talents like Reke ad Counsins again...
Actually I already debunked this theory like 10 pages earlier [here]. If you do the math we either do have enough cap space to give Igoudala 4/52M and Tyreke 4/44M already simply by amnestying Salmons or we are 2 million short and all we'd have to do is trade Jimmer or Patterson for picks or trade Thornton/Hayes/Thompson in some kind of deal where we take back a little less salary. This is hardly world-moving stuff. You have to remember these deals have escalating raises. So the yearly average might be 13 million but the first year salary is closer to 11.5M for Igoudala and if Tyreke's deal is structured exactly like Steph Curry's 4/44M deal then he would make 9.88M in his first season not 11M. Yes New Orleans can structure the deal differently but Tyreke can also sign outright with us for the same money but a deal structured so that we can also sign Igoudala. Why wouldn't Tyreke want to come back for the same money as he gets in New Orleans only as a starting PG with Igoudala as his teammate and a better chance to win right away?
Overreact much?
Lopez is different in what makes this franchise a loser?
No, but trading Evans for Vazquez is essentially letting him walk for nothing. Vazquez is a dime a dozen roleplayer, we could have let Reke walked and signed the same guy. Losing franchises let potential stars go and replace with mid priced roleplayers. At least before we were getting a big back. I didn't like the trade then, but now we're just letting him wal and helping the Pelicans balance their roster in the same stroke. Similar to how we used to help teams avoid the lux tax by taking on their players at the end of the year for cash considerations.
I can agree with that to some degree, but the post I questioned was the one you called out the franchise as a future loser because we didnt get Lopez as well.No, but trading Evans for Vazquez is essentially letting him walk for nothing. Vazquez is a dime a dozen roleplayer, we could have let Reke walked and signed the same guy. Losing franchises let potential stars go and replace with mid priced roleplayers. At least before we were getting a big back. I didn't like the trade then, but now we're just letting him wal and helping the Pelicans balance their roster in the same stroke. Similar to how we used to help teams avoid the lux tax by taking on their players at the end of the year for cash considerations.
It's not Reke for Vasquez... it's Reke for Vasquez plus about $9mil in cap space. That money will be spent... wait and see what it's spent on before deciding.
Great we can sign...Um???My math is not that good but12.8 + 7.6 = 20.4
No, but trading Evans for Vazquez is essentially letting him walk for nothing. Vazquez is a dime a dozen roleplayer, we could have let Reke walked and signed the same guy. Losing franchises let potential stars go and replace with mid priced roleplayers. At least before we were getting a big back. I didn't like the trade then, but now we're just letting him wal and helping the Pelicans balance their roster in the same stroke. Similar to how we used to help teams avoid the lux tax by taking on their players at the end of the year for cash considerations.
I can agree with that to some degree, but the post I questioned was the one you called out the franchise as a future loser because we didnt get Lopez as well.