Kings trading Evans for Vasquez/Lopez

Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem with the trade is that we suddenly wind up with no one on roster who can break down a defense in the back court. As much as everyone loves the "true" point guard, none ever seem to win. Teams that win have 2 stars and 3 role players. With Tyreke we have two stars (we've just never given him and DMC role players or a coach), without Tyreke we're just like any number of losing teams across the league with one start who's just biding their time to go sign with others. Losing Tyreke means we lose Cousins eventually unless we luck out in the lottery.

Also, I don't know if anyone has noticed, but it's not teams built on roleplayers that are winning in the NBA. It's Stars. It's not good basketball that is winning in the NBA, it's spacing and isoing stars. For the record I don't think it's fun to watch, but it's pretty easy to acknowledge. If you think Either Vasquez or Lopez can be stars you're fooling yourself. Tyreke may not be a star, but you have to be very jaded to say flat out he doesn't have that potential with a modicum of coaching.

At least we aren't letting him walk. Hearing people espouse letting him walk has been driving me insane. No one signs with the Kings... ever. To build a team we have to do it through the draft and good trades. Like him or don't it's tough to argue Tyreke is one of the two best players the Kings have ever drafted. You don't let that talent walk without getting something back if you're a small market Sacramento team. People who think we can let him walk and realistically use the cap space on anything other than something we wind up regretting is fooling themselves.
I think that is where The long rumored Monta Ellis to the kings may be revisited. On a Kevin Martin type contract it may seem like a good deal for the front office. Of course something would have to be done with Thornton, and possibly even Thomas if that we're to happen
 
With a John Salmons amnesty, that would free up over $20 MILLION in salary cap space.......WOW. Might not be a bad trade after all.
i don't understand the small market fan's obsession with cap space. what would the kings do with it, exactly? atlanta's a big market that struggles to attract free agents. their plan this offseason was to coax both chris paul and dwight howard via free agency. paul re-signed with the clips, and howard is more likely to sign with houston or re-sign with the lakers than pack his bags for the hometown hawks. they might not even be able to retain josh smith!!

so what are the kings, owners of seven straight losing seasons in an undesirable market, going to do with $20 million in cap space?! the best they could do is extend DMC to a max deal, and that doesn't actually require cap space to accomplish. after that, they'd probably be able to snag a buncha third tier talent, role players, and the like. if the kings are trying to make a play for, say, a guy like lebron james, or if they're hoping to pick up wiggins in the draft, then they're throwing away an opportunity to build a winner now in favor of a pipe dream...
 
Last edited:
Wonderful, look at all this capspace! Now we can go out and sign Chris Paul? Nope. Dwight Howard? Yeah right. Andrew Bynum? I think I just threw up. Andre Igoudala? Oh yeah, that didn't work out. Tyreke Evans? No, New Orleans snapped him up. How can anyone be excited about cap space coming off of 7 straight losing seasons? We should be spending cap space on quality players who are going to make us competitive again. Quality players like Tyreke Evans. I've made no secret of my preference for defense the entire time I've been posting on this board. Every year in the playoffs, teams built around defense have their way with the sorry pretenders who rack up sparkling regular season win totals but somehow, predictably and almost without fail, cannot repeat the same magic for 4 series in a row against the best competition in the league. So forgive me for overreacting when we had a chance to build this team in that direction and instead traded one of the most physically imposing guards in the league for a guy who probably can't guard me in a game of pickup ball. Yes Vasquez is a big talented guard who knows how to distribute the ball, but so is Tyreke. And Tyreke comes with the added bonus of also being a special man-to-man defender.

I don't think I'm a better GM than PDA or anyone else in the league. I'm not sitting here and calling them names like an internet Napoleon. I'm simply stating my disdain for our decision to sacrifice defense for passing and salary cap flexibility. It's a decision based on a basketball philosophy that I completely disagree with. I bit my tongue and gave these guys the benefit of the doubt when they said we need to get faster and we needed to find better distributors because it's soundbite stuff for the press. But we're looking at moves with domino consequences now. We were one of the worst teams in the league last year and yet we had no problem scoring the ball, even against elite teams. So the decision to get even worse defensively for a boost in offensive efficiency, maybe, has us headed in the wrong direction I think and I'm pissed about it because things started off so well with the Mike Malone hiring. I've been listening to one front office talk for years and years about improving the defense while all of their actions indicate the exact opposite and now the new regime looks like more of the same. I'm really glad the team is not moving, that doesn't mean I have to blindly accept every front office move from now until the end of time as above reproach.
a thousand times THIS.
 
I think that is where The long rumored Monta Ellis to the kings may be revisited. On a Kevin Martin type contract it may seem like a good deal for the front office. Of course something would have to be done with Thornton, and possibly even Thomas if that we're to happen
I guess maybe our FO sees it that way, but man I would hate to add a no defense chucker to compensate for losing a well rounded team first guy who is extremely efficient. I'm still hoping AV lives up to my oppinion of her for being a complete idiot. She does jump the gun on rumors like this when she doesn't like the player in question, and she definitely dislikes Reke.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Pulling the offer to Iggy a smoke screen to get this sign and trade done with Reke? Maybe Iggy already agreed to the deal with us and we're in colusion with him. If there's no deal with Iggy then there's nothing stopping us from matching the Tyreke deal right? But if there is a deal with Iggy then your cap is used up and the Pelicans can proceed knowing we're not gonna match... hence no reason to give up Vasquez. Or am I overthinking this?
At this point I have no idea, although I think it would be a bit much to have Iggy posting startled tweets and the whole thing would at the least be considered dirty pool.
 
i don't understand the small market fan's obsession with cap space. what would the kings do with it, exactly? atlanta's a big market that struggles to attract free agents. their plan this offseason was to coax both chris paul and dwight howard via free agency. paul re-signed with the clips, and howard is more likely to sign with houston or re-sign with the lakers than pack his bags for the hometown hawks. they might not even be able to retain josh smith!!

so what are the kings, owners of seven straight losing seasons in an undesirable market, going to do with $20 million in cap space?! the best they could do is extend DMC to a max deal, and that doesn't actually require cap space to accomplish. after that, they'd probably be able to snag a buncha third tier talent, role players, and the like. if the kings are trying to make a play for, say, a guy like lebron james, or if they're hoping to pick up wiggins in the draft, then they're throwing away an opportunity to build a winner now in favor of a pipe dream...
Cap space also opens up the possibilities to be a player in the Dwight Howard sweepstakes...not to get him, but as a three way. Golden State badly needs to dump salary to get him, and the Kings could take on Bogut/Biedrins (both expiring) and get back picks and maybe even a guy like Barnes. Like others have said, it's not my money.

Houston could trade to the Kings Asik and/or Lin and they could go after Josh Smith and Dwight.

Not saying either of those are the ideal trade, but just saying there are other opportunities out there with the cap space.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
Well you may have noted a certain Carmichael resident made a pass through here a bit ago. He might not have actually been confirming things -- my ears were kind of ringing at the time, so it was hard to make out :p -- but he certainly seemed enthusiastic and has been tweeting various hints and whatnot all week. So not sure that's a confirmation, but it certainly wasn't an angry Ailene is stupid denial. Seemed to be a different target for the ire. :p
Easy not to have that demeanor here when you post once every 4 months. but here everyday for 10+ years going through all the fly by night members and lunacy that comes with that. You developed an edge and edge that is needed. class move to mock someones "e-cred" by boasting his own "cred". but hey thats just me.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
Pulling the offer to Iggy a smoke screen to get this sign and trade done with Reke? Maybe Iggy already agreed to the deal with us and we're in colusion with him. If there's no deal with Iggy then there's nothing stopping us from matching the Tyreke deal right? But if there is a deal with Iggy then your cap is used up and the Pelicans can proceed knowing we're not gonna match... hence no reason to give up Vasquez. Or am I overthinking this?
Actually I already debunked this theory like 10 pages earlier [here]. If you do the math we either do have enough cap space to give Igoudala 4/52M and Tyreke 4/44M already simply by amnestying Salmons or we are 2 million short and all we'd have to do is trade Jimmer or Patterson for picks or trade Thornton/Hayes/Thompson in some kind of deal where we take back a little less salary. This is hardly world-moving stuff. You have to remember these deals have escalating raises. So the yearly average might be 13 million but the first year salary is closer to 11.5M for Igoudala and if Tyreke's deal is structured exactly like Steph Curry's 4/44M deal then he would make 9.88M in his first season not 11M. Yes New Orleans can structure the deal differently but Tyreke can also sign outright with us for the same money but a deal structured so that we can also sign Igoudala. Why wouldn't Tyreke want to come back for the same money as he gets in New Orleans only as a starting PG with Igoudala as his teammate and a better chance to win right away?
 
Cap space also opens up the possibilities to be a player in the Dwight Howard sweepstakes...not to get him, but as a three way. Golden State badly needs to dump salary to get him, and the Kings could take on Bogut/Biedrins (both expiring) and get back picks and maybe even a guy like Barnes. Like others have said, it's not my money.

Houston could trade to the Kings Asik and/or Lin and they could go after Josh Smith and Dwight.

Not saying either of those are the ideal trade, but just saying there are other opportunities out there with the cap space.
Also could open up other trade options for guys like Deng, Granger, and Gay without sending back much salary. Lots of opens out there for sure...Hopefully we will find out soon what these other possibilities are that Amick mentioned the Kings are considering. Hopefully Gay or Monta won't be seriously considered.
 
Trading Evans for Vasquez essentially straight-up would be a brilliant move for the Kings. To me it's not proof of incompetence, but rather proof that the new regime is actually thinking down the road and not willing to settle for just being "kinda good" or a borderline playoff team.

With this move you not only save money (that can be used now or later) but you also get a player that is a better fit for this team. Vasquez is a true point-guard that actually makes other players better and if any team needed a player that makes other players better it's this one.

Ask yourself this..... does Tyreke Evans make Cousins better? Will Tyreke Evans make Ben McLemore better? Does Tyreke Evans make Thornton better? The answer to all of these questions is no and in the case of McLemore, a guy like Evans might actually get in his way and hinder his development.

Bottom line is that many Kings fans seriously overrate Tyreke Evans. What has the team done with him the last few years? Has he really gotten that much better since his rookie year? The numbers certainly don't indicate it and I don't want to hear excuses either. Excuses only go so far and at the end of the day you are what your stats say you are.

Yes Tyreke Evans can get to the basket and yes he can put up some decent numbers (on bad teams) but guys like him are essentially a dime-a-dozen. They don't help you win. It may look like they do but wins and losses are what matters and when you keep losing games the losses speak for themselves. Some of that blame has to fall on the supposed "best players" and the guys that always have the ball in their hands.

Tyreke Evans is a good player and would probably have some real value as say the 3rd best player on a well organized team like the Spurs with a solid structure and less selfish players but on a team like the Kings he's not going to help you get to your end goal if he's one of your two best players. Yes he's better than Vasquez in terms of sheer talent but this league isn't always about sheer talent, it's about making your teammates better and Vasquez may be just the type of catalyst that the Kings need to make Cousins and McLemore better.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Iggy is virtually the ONLY high priced free agent that makes sense as a target. But god, after Tuesday would he still talk to us?

On that front maybe Dave has more inside knowledge of what actually happened than we do. And Iggy/Vasquez combo package, albeit at $16mil is certainly a lot better recompense than a Lopez/Vasquez package.
Amick just Tweeted that He heard that Lopez may be going to Portland in the deal. He doesn't know who Portland would be giving up in the deal.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
I may have missed this in all the posts, but has anyone realized that this pretty much makes this DMC's team? Am I the only one viewing this as an indication they're going to be building around Cousins as the cornerstone of their franchise?

I loved Evans and have fond memories despite some horrible seasons. The more I think about this move, if it comes to fruition, is that the front office is setting up to be able to pay Cousins the max and still have some players left to take the court with him...
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
Trading Evans for Vasquez essentially straight-up would be a brilliant move for the Kings. To me it's not proof of incompetence, but rather proof that the new regime is actually thinking down the road and not willing to settle for just being "kinda good" or a borderline playoff team.

With this move you not only save money (that can be used now or later) but you also get a player that is a better fit for this team. Vasquez is a true point-guard that actually makes other players better and if any team needed a player that makes other players better it's this one.

Ask yourself this..... does Tyreke Evans make Cousins better? Will Tyreke Evans make Ben McLemore better? Does Tyreke Evans make Thornton better? The answer to all of these questions is no and in the case of McLemore, a guy like Evans might actually get in his way and hinder his development.

Bottom line is that many Kings fans seriously overrate Tyreke Evans. What has the team done with him the last few years? Has he really gotten that much better since his rookie year? The numbers certainly don't indicate it and I don't want to hear excuses either. Excuses only go so far and at the end of the day you are what your stats say you are.

Yes Tyreke Evans can get to the basket and yes he can put up some decent numbers (on bad teams) but guys like him are essentially a dime-a-dozen. They don't help you win. It may look like they do but wins and losses are what matters and when you keep losing games the losses speak for themselves. Some of that blame has to fall on the supposed "best players" and the guys that always have the ball in their hands.

Tyreke Evans is a good player and would probably have some real value as say the 3rd best player on a well organized team like the Spurs with a solid structure and less selfish players but on a team like the Kings he's not going to help you get to your end goal if he's one of your two best players. Yes he's better than Vasquez in terms of sheer talent but this league isn't always about sheer talent, it's about making your teammates better and Vasquez may be just the type of catalyst that the Kings need to make Cousins and McLemore better.
You're forgetting that offense is only half of the game.
 
I have a lot of the same thoughts about Tyreke, sergmatt. My only reservation is I thought Tyreke + MLM was an interesting combo, with Tyreke being an attack guard. But that ship is sailing, sailing away...
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Amick just Tweeted that He heard that Lopez may be going to Portland in the deal. He doesn't know who Portland would be giving up in the deal.
If that was the theory, we actually wouldn't WANT anything from Portland. If the idea was to open capspace and then try to once again sign Iggy or whatever, then at most we'd want a pick from Portland.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
I may have missed this in all the posts, but has anyone realized that this pretty much makes this DMC's team? Am I the only one viewing this as an indication they're going to be building around Cousins as the cornerstone of their franchise?

I loved Evans and have fond memories despite some horrible seasons. The more I think about this move, if it comes to fruition, is that the front office is setting up to be able to pay Cousins the max and still have some players left to take the court with him...
yeah we realize that. only problem is you mention 1 person. Its cuz team. BUT Lakers, heat, Thunder, boston, Spurs. all the elite team don't just have that 1 player with role players around them. they have 2-3 stars. without Tyreke baring a Maclemore explosion (which very well may happen) we have 1 star.
 

Entity

Hall of Famer
From Blazer source

Jason Quick @jwquick 1 minute ago

If 3-team deal reported by @Ailene Voisin and @Sam Amick goes down, Blazers would absorb contract of C Robin Lopez and give up nothing

Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz2Y6AXWMD1

Looks like we'd get nothing from Portland.
again all this coming from same source (voison) just retweets of her original tweet. no other comfrimation than that. I'm not saying it isn't true just want another outlet. would really like to some tweets from Evans or Brother.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
You're forgetting that offense is only half of the game.
Amongst other things. Miami's Big Three hardly make each other better -- in fact hey are always struggling with this guy or that being forgotten. People have long questioned if Westbrook helps or hinders Durant. But you win with talent in the NBA. You fit your roleplayers around your stars, but stars are too rare and unique to get too picky about.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
I hate waking up to this news as Tyreke was one of the only watchable things and signs of hope for the Kings in recent years. It is sad that the Maloofs and their crappy coaches basically killed all the potential he showed in his first season by constantly shuffling him around to fit other mediocre players onto the floor. I do think if Reke had been trusted at point for the past 4 years he would have developed into a competent PG by modern NBA standards.

It sounds like this move could make us a little more competitive, but again that is at a high price in if we had properly developed Reke we could be a lot competitive.

I'm just going to wait and see. But I'm definitely sad to lose Reke. And I guess I will hope that it isn't true until it is.
 
A comparison, an unfortunate one, suggested itself to me, and I looked it up, and sure enough:

Career Per36 numbers of two largish, slowfooted, shooting impaired 26yr old PGs:

Player 1: 16.3pts (.441 .324 .798) 4.3reb 6.7ast 1.1stl 0.1blk 2.7TO
Player 2: 13.2pts (.429 .325 .806) 4.0reb 8.3ast 1.0stl 0.1blk 3.2TO

Player 1 is Ramon Sessions. Players 2 is Grevis Vasquez.

And hence why despite the nice statline last season I have questions about how much is solid and how much illusion with Vasquez. Only added to when New Orleans summarily replaced him as their first offseason move. I obviously like him more than Sessions, but do I trust him? Is he legit or just big numbers on a bad team.
Because Tyreke Evans was putting up his numbers on a playoff team right? haha what a hypocrite.
 
You're forgetting that offense is only half of the game.
I'm not forgetting. Defense is another area where Tyreke is slightly overrated. Yes Tyreke is a good defender but he's not a great defender. Maybe in a great defensive system, Tyrekes defense continues to improve to the point of being great but at least the last few years he has not been a great game-changing type defender. How do I know that? Simple, the Kings defense has been pathetic the last few years and defenders that are true "difference makers" don't play on teams that are dead-last in defense.

Speaking of defense, this teams defense doesn't go anywhere as a unit until DeMarcus Cousins decides to start playing some defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.