Twix
Starter
Right when it hit the 6pm mark Cali time.Variant said:this game was winnable except that we didn't start playing until the last 8 minutes or so.


Right when it hit the 6pm mark Cali time.Variant said:this game was winnable except that we didn't start playing until the last 8 minutes or so.
VF21 said:Clog up what? They weren't going inside; they were shooting from the perimeter all night.
What killed us was absymal shooting by Webber and Pedja and totally unacceptable shooting from the stripe.
Well Webb was obviously not equipped to gaurd Bosh! Tag at least would've fouled him hard.VF21 said:Are you kidding?
You think Ostertag could have guarded Bosh? Did you watch the game????
Bosh is young, agile and VERY fast. Tag wouldn't have been any more effective against him than anyone else was - and that's not speculation.
HndsmCelt said:Hind sight is 20/20 I honestly can't fault Adelman here. Second guess him sure but doing what he did when he did it good calls. I doubt any coach in the NBA would have played Tag tonight.
Entity said:Believe me with the way Phoenix is playing and we are playing we will not lose home court by just one game. I am thinking 4th or 5th spot.
HndsmCelt said:Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves. So lets give credit where ctedit was due FYI Webber in the post game said his legs felt good, that it was just a bad shooting night.
SacTownKid said:How many points did our bench score tonight!? 16 combined.
Who got us back into the game!? Stats don't mean crap. Scoring wasn't what got us back into it.
Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.SacTownKid said:Well Tag is playing career lows in min. Apparently Sloan didn't follow this idea.
Not sure what your trying to prove with that shot chart.We outscored them by 10... 34-24 in the paint. Tag resides in the paint, he aint chasing those kids on mid-range jumpers either.BigWaxer said:While I hate to disagree with you VF.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=250105028
they only made 7-24 from 3 point land thats only 21 points. Most of there points were in the area a center would/could be covering. I know Tag doesn't like to go outside of the paint but not to give him any min's at all. Not to mention long shots equal rebounds.
Would it have changed the game? Well I doubt it. The King's didnt want it tonight I guess. Just another game were they thought they could walk in against a sub par team and win. Definately mentality of a championship team.
HndsmCelt said:Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves. So lets give credit where ctedit was due FYI Webber in the post game said his legs felt good, that it was just a bad shooting night.
Well there may be a little more to qualify as a really good team than jsut loosing in Toronto, but yeah I think the Kings are a really good team... who just had a bad night. And Toronto is a decent team, that palys well at home and seems to have the ablity to step up for big games.Bballkingsrock said:I guess all the good teams lost to them. Then the Kings are considered a good team right? LOL
Celt do you really have to bring logic and facts into this?HndsmCelt said:Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.
HndsmCelt said:Give Tronto prop here folks the WERE hitting open shots,moving the ball well, and remember this team has also beatten SA, Phoenix and the T Wolves.
HndsmCelt said:Tag was a starter in Utha with really margianal players behind him like Greg Foster. Of course Sloan played him, he had to.
given the distance form the rim the majority of those shots came form thats not so bad, but yes if you are looking for a deciding factor in the game the look at the FT discrpency Kings 21-33 and Toronto 17-22 and Turn overs Kings 15 Toronto 11. But you still have to credit the Raps with a good game based on ball movement and running the floor.piksi said:Toronto shot 39% from the floor.
piksi said:Toronto shot 39% from the floor.
Ooops my bad. I though they beat the Suns, but you are right, however they did beat Miami and Detroit... so my point is they do beat top teams...Twix said:Thanks for pointing that out. I checked Raptors schedule, they beated Spurs by 5 and Twolves by 6 at home. They're now 10-4 at home (almost as good as the Kings home). They did lose to Suns though... but that was at Phoenix.
VF21 said:BigWaxer - The perimeter is outside the paint..
We're an elite team, we should be making people match up with US, not the other way around.
Look I have been a Tag supporter from DAY one. When only a few posters were not screaming that loosing Vlade and siginng Tag would be the undoing of the team. Do I think he sould paly more... yes. Do I think that he should paly every game, Im not sure. I do understand the litis of his game in as much as we ahve seen of him, but if I were coaching I might want to experiment to SEE those limits in action with this squad, tonight might have been a good time to try just such an experiment, but bear in mind it would be an experiment. Truth be told Tag like most big heavy cneters has historicly NOT palyed well defensivly against lighter athletic centers who shoot out side the paint. Tag is not know for his passing and has never really been part of a team offense before. So how well h will do for long minuets in Sac is unknown, but so far I would say he has earned the right to try in a game where the starters are strugleing against a team that is not paly off bound., or during a huge lead.. tonight would have been a good time, perhaps the game in Atalanta will provide a better lab if the starters can get a nice 15 point lead in the 3rd.SacTownKid said:Well on the other hand I believe he was a starter b/c he was capable of being a starter not because Sloan had no choice.
Should he start on this team? No.
Should he have games where he doesn't play at all? No.
Should he avg. 10 min a game? No.
Don't get me wrong I see your point, Tag should at least get on the court. But you can't just ignore facts, We did outscore them in the paint, we did outrebound them. We couldn't score for long stretches... not exactly a situation screaming for Tag. But Hey, he should have at least gotten a shot, He's earned it.BigWaxer said:Thats exactly what I said in my post. Believe it or not tag does have to step outside of the paint sometimes.
He had 10 rebounds last night. I hate Tag, he is not the Kings savior, He sucks as a player and I have always thought that. I still think that and think it was a bad pickup for the Kings. Now u get were I am comming from. I cannot stand him as a player... But I support him as a King.
But my thoughts on this game and topics.
It's kinda a double edge sword considering Brad was playing so well. Do we pull Brad and put tag in just to do it? No that wouldn't make sense. I would say maybe pull Webb and try Tag for a bit and put Miller as the PF. Who knows.
The starters except for 2 didn't want to play. It may have made a difference if tag was in. Would of been nice to see. Even 2 to 5 min of time just to see how the Raps would match up. Either way I think we would have lost.
I really like and agree with this quote by Donne
Tonight our bench really got out played to. Look at the raps bench they had 35 pts ours had 16.
I may have been blinded the past week with the good play from our bench crew.
It's only one game lets see how the rest of this month unfolds. Gonna be a tough road after our next few games.
Well said.KP said:Don't get me wrong I see your point, Tag should at least get on the court. But you can't just ignore facts, We did outscore them in the paint, we did outrebound them. We couldn't score for long stretches... not exactly a situation screaming for Tag. But Hey, he should have at least gotten a shot, He's earned it.